User talk:Kotoito

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Kotoito, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few helpful links to start you off: Avoiding common mistakes, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style, Policies and guidelines, Help, Merging pages.

If you need help or are curious about something, feel free to ask on my talk page or the village pump. You can sign your name and a date stamp on comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Andre (talk) 20:02, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Please let me know if Darin Fidika (talk · contribs) continues to pass fictional material as fact, as I had previously warned him on this issue. I've warned him again, and I believe that another block may be necessary if he continues this pattern. Meanwhile, since I do not have sufficient knowledge of Japanese history to be able to tell, please do look those articles over and tag them with {{cleanup-fiction}} as necessary if you have the time to do it. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 15:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I will make an effort for survey his fictional parts in articles. And, he/she revealed in his note the sources were Samurai-Archives. I took a look through Samurai-Archives. This website is partly very well but partly fictional, because of, on the one hand using the good English historical survey, on the other hand using Japanese "fanzine" for Japanese History, for example "Rekishi-Gunzo" and "Rekishi-Tokuhon". And more, I seem Darin Fidika's articles and Samurai-Archives' articles[1] are very similar, not same in verbatim ac literatim. I don't know rules of English Wikipedia very-well, but I seem it is naerly copyvio. Please let me know those articles seem to be copyvio or not. --Kotoito 11:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting - Rekishi Gunzo isn't "fiction", and is generally accepted as historically accurate, although the articles are written more for the general reader rather than the historian. They are about on the level of a Stephen Turnbull book or an "Osprey" military series book - the sort of thing that is generally reliable but should be backed up with another source. --Kuuzo 22:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If it's not verbatim, it's in my opinion not copyright violation. You cannot copyright an idea, and if you're not actually copying, it's not copyright violation, as a result. Still, this user's inability to distinguish fact and fiction is troubling. Please do let me know if his pattern of conduct continues. --Nlu (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I unterstood. I will point out one example, where is the historical soruce that Shima Sakon "also weilded his famous two-handed falchion" ? when I have sufficient time.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]