User talk:Lemonsquares

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Lemonsquares! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fullobeans (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Derogatory Category[edit]

Lemonsquares, please refrain from adding the derogatory category "Statutory rapists" to politicians who had sex with 16 or 17 year old people (i.e Gerry Studds, Buz Lukens, and Dan Crane). In none of these cases was the subject charged with, let alone convicted of, statutory rape. In all three cases, the people it is alleged the subject had sex with were OVER the age of consent. With Lukens and Crane, this violates WP:BLP, wikipedia's policy about biographies of living people. Studds is dead, but his reputation deserves no less care because of it. Thanks. David in DC (talk) 03:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In a very nice bit of jiu-jitsu, I've wound up hurting Gerry Studds's memory and helping Dan Crane and Buz Lukens' reputations. For now. Well-played. David in DC (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on adding information of politicians in the United States, I award you this barnstar as a matter of thanks. Chris (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. The more people we have fighting the nut jobs like Reid and Pelosi, the better. Chris (talk) 14:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I did anything wrong.[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lemonsquares (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Lemonsquares (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Not provided

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 07:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lemonsquares (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't believe I've done anything wrong. I've been a productive user of Wikipedia. I editing using Wikipedia. I follow the rules. I see no reason why I should be blocked.

Decline reason:

See Will Beback below. — Sandstein 09:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin: You were found by checkuser to be a sock of banned user RWReagan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you would like to edit please get that account unblocked first. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Jolene Unsoeld.jpg[edit]

File:Jolene Unsoeld.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jolene Unsoeld.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jolene Unsoeld.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bennett M Stewart.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bennett M Stewart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Craig Washington.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Craig Washington.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. —innotata 09:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Elizabeth B Andrews.jpg[edit]

The file File:Elizabeth B Andrews.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Julian C Dixon.jpg[edit]

The file File:Julian C Dixon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Louise Goff Reece.jpg[edit]

The file File:Louise Goff Reece.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lucien E Blackwell.jpg[edit]

The file File:Lucien E Blackwell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]