User talk:Lucid-dream

Welcome!

Hello, Lucid-dream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 19:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to State of Palestine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why my IP has been blocked, perhaps as a group IP block? I have no idea what a "messing with a vadal image" is and I certainly never have vandalized a page. Please unblock me.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lucid-dream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

74.131.28.122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

messing with a vadal image

Blocking administrator: John Reaves (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucid-dream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I have no idea why I have been blocked. I have no idea what a "messing with a vadal [sic] image" is and I certainly never have vandalized a page. I have not edited a page in weeks and have certainly never did an edit in bad faith. Can you give me evidence or details of what sort of vandalism I supposedly did? Otherwise please unblock me. Thank you. Lucid-dream 20:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

reason — you removed a db tag from an image being used to vandalise wikipedia. The image has been deleted taking your edit with it but admins can see deleted edits. The edit was 28 August. So, either your account has been compromised and should therefore be indef blocked or you are being less then honest ... well you probably get the message. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I can think of is I tried to remove a very bad pornographic image that a vandal put on the "Moon" page. Why would I get blocked for trying to remove vandalism? I don't even know what a db tag is. Again please unblock me. Thanks. Lucid-dream 18:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I have still not heard a reply to my unblock request so I must appeal again. As I stated, the only thing I beleive I did was try to remove a pornogrpahic image from the 'Moon' article a couple weeks back, but for some unknown reason my attempt to do so was seen as vandalism when I was just trying, in good faith, to remove vandalism. Please look into that edit and review my edit history, you will see I only do good faith edits so please consider my unblock request, thank you [[User:Lucid-dream|Lucid-dream]] 22:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC). }}

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I believe you acted in good faith and got caught in friendly fire. Sorry about the inconvenience caused. Request handled by: -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]