User talk:Mollythefarmgirl

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Mollythefarmgirl/sandbox (June 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 20:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Fairfax (soldier) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1655, pp. 151, 324</ref> He was the father of General Thomas Fairfax 1633-1712, William 1630-73 (whose son was [[Robert Fairfax (rear-admiral)]], Catherine b1634 and Isabella Fairfax 1635-91 who

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mollythefarmgirl. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips on references[edit]

Hello! I've noticed that in some of your articles, some of the references are ambiguous, incomplete, or otherwise unclear, which hinders verification by others. For instance, Nathaniel Bladen contains ambiguous references like "Dictionary of National Biography" (missing year, author, publisher, edition, page number, etc.) and "C BRS/7/53 Hull History Centre". Similarly, William Bladen (Alderman) contains vague references like "Records of the Stationers Company". References like the last two should contain information on where the records are located, what pages consulted, what "C BRS/7/53" refers to, and other bibliographic information (including urls/websites if appropriate). You also cite a lot of primary sources, which should be done sparingly and with caution to prevent Original research or novel synthesis (i.e. statements or conclusions which do not already exist in reliable sources). Per policy, articles should be based largely on secondary sources, and to a lesser extent primary and tertiary sources. Furthermore, primary sources alone (marriage records, membership archives, documents written by a subject, etc.) cannot establish notability: we need evidence that secondary sources besides yourself have considered a subject worthy of note and given it significant coverage. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Referencing for beginners for more thorough details on referencing, and strive to provide enough bibliographic information on sources to allow another user to accurately identify and locate the exact source of information. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Theodosia Ivie, from its old location at User:Mollythefarmgirl/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theodosia Ivie has been accepted[edit]

Theodosia Ivie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]