User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 → Archive 5

  • Please note that this archive is not chronologically correct, as I switched to manual archiving after attempts to bot archive were either unsuccessful or the bots doing the archiving were discontinued.



Image:Liza-weil-gg100.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Liza-weil-gg100.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Nooby_god | Talk 23:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

No objection to deletion - redundant image - Mrschimpf 01:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Please fix the logos on the page so they display properly. Would you make a section on the bottom of the page just for the logos and their associated discussion? thx Royalbroil 05:38, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Of course, I'm just updating them with color copies, I'll modify the main page once finished with a logo section. Nate

I completed the update with the new gallery, apologies for the problems with the page while I edited in the color logos :) Nate 06:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Great job on the logos! I caught you in the middle of your edits. Thanks Royalbroil 06:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

WGBA logo history

Wow. I can't say I remembered WLRE-26's 'The Great Entertainer' slogan until seeing the early logo you found and uploaded.

Any chance you'd be able to supplement WACY-TV with any of its logo incarnations as well?

Thanks for the memories... Skybunny 05:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to try to go through old videotapes, but I'm not sure I could go as deep as the Super 32 days, but I'll try. Nate 05:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


WWAC and the CW

I do not know what search paramaters you are using, but apparently you are not getting the same results as I have. I am a media professional in the New York/New Jersey area and I have interviewed with the station. It is real, I have been to their offices and studios. Please stop your vandalism! UncleFloyd 04:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the Googling and Yahooing I did showed no proof that this station exists, and if it did it would be within the Philly/Atlantic City template. I used the call letters and it led immediately to digital only WMCN, which has only one channel and no subchannels. Looking up the parent company (outside of the cited website) didn't lead me anywhere except to Yellow Page listings involving burglar alarm companies, and a whois search of the company leaves me unsure. However the biggest factor is a lack of the station appearing in B&C, TVWeek, Community Business Journals, and CW PR at all. That's what I go on by adds, not some random name leaving an affiliation on an article.
I'm not going to argue about this anymore and let other people take care of it, because there's also the factor that all the articles pertaining to WWAC and Jersey Shore were created tonight and the WWAC 'logo' being a copy of Fox's new MyFox logo which I don't doubt is copyrighted by FTSG. There's just too much fishy about all of this to believe it real.
Also, I'm a male, the name is MrSchimpf. Thank you. Nate 05:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Careful with "vandalism"

I noticed that you removed the superfluous phrase "in connecticut" from Gilmore Girls with the edit summary "rv vandalism". Please be careful with the term "vandalism". As discussed at Wikipedia:Vandalism, it should only be used when the material is inarguably intended to sabotage an article. It should never be used to address content disputes or trivial problems. Thank you for your cooperation. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I should've been more clear with my edit, I meant the other line about Bob Dylan that I edited out (Rory never said that and it wouldn't make sense in the general tone of the article, even if true), not the first instance, which I would've edited out without comment. My apologies. Nate 05:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Re U.S. Bank Center

No problem. If you think the sentence may be confusing to others, feel free to reword it. Feel free also to add what you noted about the retail branch names, because I think it helps explain why the building changed names when it did. HollyAm 02:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

WBAY-TV

Changing the telethon hosts to generic was done because...you don't think that should be noted?

WBAY-TV has never done the "Sunday Mass" from St. Nubby's AFAIK.

Quit trying to be an expert in something you're not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Unit (talk • contribs)

I don't think it should be noted because the sentence says it itself, national telethons have gone by the wayside except for Jerry Lewis and MDA on Labor Day, and it is clear that now that if there's a telethon, without exception it's usually a local effort. I'm not going to add local personalities and celebrities to the article because they'd all be permanent red-linkers and no one beyond Brown County knows them.
And they have done it from the Abbey, a Google search confirms that and even if I'm wrong, they have always aired a Sunday Mass period.
If you feel I'm wrong, correct the information and make the changes yourself. Don't get annoyed and snippy at me on my talk page and attack me for information I think right, I try to be correct 100% of the time, and if I'm wrong, I'm sorry. This is a collabarative encyclopedia and I haven't done anything wrong to you. Also, please sign your contributions with four tildes. Nate 19:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps you should get out more.David Unit 23:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh yea, I checked...a zillion years ago when WBAY-AM was king. I'm a great-great nephew of a Norbertine Father, I know how it operated................I've forgotten more about television in the last week than you'll ever know in your lifetime.David Unit 23:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to be snippy on my talk page then...I'm not going to change it...I've discovered in the short time that I've been here that if there's a choice between "being correct" or "saving face for vanity sake", "vanity" wins..... Feel free to put incorrect information out so that you can feel like you "won".......David Unit 23:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Liza Weil Ojai Playwrights Conference.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Liza Weil Ojai Playwrights Conference.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

That's fine that you changed the logo that I added. I just put it on there until a screencap could be added.

What do you think of the new logo? Also, do you know if WJMN changed theirs?

Nwa757 04:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

They definitely did, but since I can't get WJMN I put a message on the talk page asking anyone with a tuner card and access to WJMN to screencap their logo. The only way I could see it otherwise is if WFRV put up a 'please stand by' card or I tuned in during an EAS test, that's how I've seen and capped the WJMN logo in the past.
I think the logo change is OK, though I'm more annoyed with them putting a constant bug on the screen during their shows. Nate 03:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

WKTC

I can't verify the calls. I'll get Stefanie Rein to help me out. -TrackerTV 00:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

WBLU

Hey there, I've noticed and a few other people have that someone keeps putting programming on WBLU's page... Once again the person has done it again, which is the 4th time I think, but I cleared off. Any way to stop that person?

I don't know, probably an IP block might do it, they must be editing via dial-up because each time they have a new address. I'll check with WP:TVS. Nate 21:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks... So far the tvguide hasn't came back :) JTB_KY

You can bet your a-- it WILL be back —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.253.113.230 (talk • contribs) .

No the Herald-Leader did not list us, and yes we had MUCH local programming. In fact all of it was "local" from the time CBS stole our UPN affiliation until Equity took over all programming and production. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.163.224.200 (talk • contribs) .

A network affiliation does not equal "local programming", nor does showing public domain films, I'm sorry. I'm sure you produce some local stuff, but definitely not 24/7 because the station's budget would be gone by day one. I'm not arguing with you about this; keep the TV listings off the page, they aren't needed. Also, please use WP:NPOV as a guidepoint. Thank you. Nate 00:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Leo's G4 Opinion.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Leo's G4 Opinion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

WNYS TV

Why did you revert my edits? WB43 became My43 on September 5, 2006 and I was recognizing this in the article. The station is no longer affiliated with the WB since the WB no longer exists. Darry2385 13:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing it up! No hard feelings. Darry2385 19:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Gsnguy

Thanks for letting me know, some of his fake slogans are downright stupid...

--CFIF ☎ ⋐ 23:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

All of those gave me some good laughs, because only a station on crack would use them, they're all pretty bad. I still can't believe on his talk page he said he added them in order to get adminship faster. I'd be very afraid if he was considered for that...Nate 09:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

That wasn't nice.

Regarding this. I am not a "troublesome user."--B&W Anime Fan 15:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Judging from your user talk page, problems with keeping your temper in check and conflicts with others, you need to learn how to cooperate more with other editors. Nate 04:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WCGV TV Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WCGV TV Logo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 00:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 09:40, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Cake

Thanks for adding a little information to the Cake (TV series) article. Quasyboy 25:57 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WQCW CW Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WQCW CW Logo.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Went ahead and speedied this (didn't know that the image was changed), thanks! Nate 15:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Sheboygan South High School

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Sheboygan South High School on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the Sandbox. Asher Heimermann 02:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I made the WHBL-AM article. Feel free to add to the article. Asher Heimermann 03:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I'll be subtracting from the article, because once again you took content directly from a source without attribution, this time from the station's website (in the second paragraph). Learn how to write an article in NPOV form before you start another article, and spend time doing your research before you post. Nate 03:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

WHBL-AM

Hey, quick question, where did you find this on the web site?

WHBL is known for it's WHBL Rewards Club where members of the club listen for keywords each day and enter them online. WHBL also provides News, Weather, Sports, Road reports, specials reports like; football and baseball.

I agree with removing it, but I don't see that exact text on http://www.whbl.com. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

It sounded to me that he just took a look at the website and wrote a paragraph listing the various pages on the site. I don't know if it's considered a copyvio, but I thought it was poorly-worded. Nate 03:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Nope, copyvio is cutting and pasting text from the web site. What Asher did was legitimate research. The first sentence you removed was kind of promotional-sounding and the second sentence is unremarkable (it's what most radio stations do), but it doesn't appear to be a copyvio. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll keep that in mind next time this happens, it was in a grey area I couldn't really see one way or another. I appreciate your judgement call on this Jim, it always helps :). Nate 03:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Here are some guidelines that can help: Wikipedia:Spotting possible copyright violations. But the simple thing to do is if you suspect something is a copyvio, past sentences from it into google and see what pops up. In the case of the above text, I was pretty sure it wasn't a copyvio because of the grammatical errors ("it's" instead of "its"; inappropriate capitalization, and a misplaced ";"). Pasting chunks of it into google found nothing, and I didn't see text that looked much like it in a manual review of the web site.

BTW, Liza Weil? Really? Alexis Bledel is totally hot! :-) -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

That really helps, thank you! I've found copyvios before but didn't take action unless I thought it was clearly taken from the site, and I thought that fell into it. I should've probably just still reverted, but cited it as poorly-written rather than copyvio (I was also taking in mind the actual marketing ads on the station too). Thanks again.
As for Liza over Alexis; I agree that Alexis is totally hot, but I find Liza more laid back, girl-next-door-like and cute, plus her voice is just sexy (along with her naturally curvaceous body). Each his own ;). Nate 04:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sheboygan Rotary Sign.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sheboygan Rotary Sign.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 00:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

FSN

thanks for filling out info on the Wisconsin side of the channel. I honestly would not have had any idea where to find it... Ehren 05:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NBC Flag Bug.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NBC Flag Bug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA Logo 2003-2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA Logo 2003-2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA-TV Logo 2000-2003.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA-TV Logo 2000-2003.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA Logo 1995-1999.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA Logo 1995-1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA Logo 1992-1995.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA Logo 1992-1995.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA Logo 1980-1986.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA Logo 1980-1986.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WGBA Logo 1995-1999.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:WGBA Logo 1995-1999.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Paris Geller.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paris Geller.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Caitlin Wachs

Please make a minimal effort at some research before you delete items from articles on a whim. If you had gone to the IMDb link [1] at the bottom of the page, it is then obvious that Caitlin Wachs is in the cast of Mary Worth. Ward3001 17:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Gah, sorry. I thought it was a fake from the fact I couldn't locate it at all (and it should have a WP page), plus the title and source of the work. My deepest apologies. Nate 19:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:American Broadcasting Company Logo.png

Greetings. I came by the image you uploaded, Image:American Broadcasting Company Logo.png, and noticed it claimed to be a vector image, but it was uploaded in PNG format. Anyway, I've converted it to SVG using Adobe Illustrator and uploaded the actual vector version, whilst nominating it for deletion since it's no longer used and under a false claim. Just keep that in mind in the future that vector images on Wikipedia must be in Scalable Vector Graphics at the time being, and even if they're converted from an Encapsulated PostScript file, if they're made into another format, they don't retain their scalability. Cheers. Alex43223 T | C | E 01:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MyTVtampabay.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MyTVtampabay.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:FNchicago.PNG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:FNchicago.PNG and also as Image:FNchicago.png. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 10:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Wisconsin Field House

Hello! I noticed that you once moved this page from Wisconsin Field House to University of Wisconsin Field House. Well, it found its way back to its original location at Wisconsin Field House. The "official" site (or as official as I can find) refers to the building as the "Wisconsin Field House", though I am not sure which location it should really be at. I will make a note of this on the talk page. If you have any opinion over the article location, please say. The new page move was done by a habitually disruptive editor (User:Miaers) most likely to make a POINT about the "University of Wisconsin" nomenclature. Your imput would be appreciated! Thanks! – Lordmontu (talk) • (contribs) 00:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm currently waiting for the speedy deletion of Wisconsin Field House to go through, so I can move The Wisconsin Field House to it. Thanks for your input! – Lordmontu (talk) • (contribs) 00:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Converting JPEG logos to PNG

I was looking at the discussion; it's not something I'm really up to speed on, but I've been trying to. I don't think I'm really getting true PNG images though. What tool do you recommend for conversion? dhett (talk • contribs) 03:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, the AmericaOne logo is a GIF. Kosher? dhett (talk • contribs) 03:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I usually convert using Irfanview, it's simple and easy to use. As for GIF's, they're usually discouraged because they can end up with jagged edges in images when shrunk down from their original size; PNGs do not do that. Nate 03:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


Dorothy Parker Drank Here Productions

I am with you. See the Discussion page on Dorothy Parker. --K72ndst 18:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Eye (Eve's Plum Single)

No offense, but your opinion on the movie shouldn't influence whether or not to delete it. It's notable because it was the only single from the soundtrack, which featured many notable artists. The movie was also a blockbuster hit. It's notable enough to have a wikipedia article. Also, Eve's Plum is notable enough to have wikipedia article and so should their most recognizable song, shouldn't it? I don't mean to argue or sound rude, but I'm trying to build so that should someone stumble upon this remarkable yet ridiculously forgotten band, that they can find as much information as they can seeing as how it's taken me awhile to get all the correct information myself. I'm asking you to please at least delete your input that the article be deleted if I can't change your mind. --LoveLaced 06:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

It was one single off a movie soundtrack, which at least at that time wasn't really as regarded as a source for music as it is now. The article for Eve's Plum states that they didn't have much success. It's not a matter of how well-known the band is, but it was a single that obviously didn't recieve much attention except for a small audience.
Also, I will not retract my opinion because the fact that the movie was mentioned in the article itself was no big hit, shows that it wasn't well-known outside of its small audience (it was released in early January 1995; traditionally January films are looked at as not the best work of the film industry). The article is also not written in an encyclopedic style, and as it seems that you're trying to be a one-person fanclub for Eve's Plum, probably violates the guidlines for not being NPOV.
I do thank you for bringing up the article for the movie though, I have to edit out a racial slur in the narrative. Nate 06:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ABC_Studios.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ABC_Studios.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 13:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:USA Network 2002-2005 Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:USA Network 2002-2005 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:USA Network Logo 1980-1996.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:USA Network Logo 1980-1996.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:USA Network Logo 1996-1999.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:USA Network Logo 1996-1999.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:USA Network Logo 1999-2002.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:USA Network Logo 1999-2002.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:WVTV TV Logo.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WVTV TV Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:WISN_2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WISN_2006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 19:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WBUW 2002-2004 Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WBUW 2002-2004 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:WHPN 1999-2002 Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WHPN 1999-2002 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WOI5.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WOI5.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Somebody deleted my vote

Last night you sent me a message not to remove a persons vote. I didn't know i had done that, I thought i had undone an edit so my vote would be there. Somebody deleted my vote. (Woggy 08:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC))

Smile!

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 07:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the WikiLove :)! Nate 07:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

MyNetworkTV

Please stop removing wikilinks from this page. The proper form is being followed – and since this is a hypertext medium, your actions appear as bad faith. Please edit articles in the proper way and do not remove useful links. I assume you are already familiar with the 3RR rule. Thank you. Nz Opwfmbt 08:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WISN_12_News_Intro.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WISN_12_News_Intro.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wisconsin Public Television Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wisconsin Public Television Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:WFRV_CBS_5_Logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:WFRV_CBS_5_Logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 15:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Image talk:Picture 1.png

Your recent deletion of all the text on the Image talk:Picture 1.png discussion page has me confused. Your edit summary says you are reverting spam, yet it is text created by the person who uploaded the image. Assuming good faith, the text should go with the image. There may be a question as to whether the image itself should be on Wikipedia. If that is what you are trying to do, please review the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion guideline articles. I would be interesting in understanding the reason for your edits. Your comments are welcome. Thanks. Truthanado 20:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I understand your point. Why not tag the image as speedy delete (no evidence of notability) so that the image and the talk page disappear? I would support that. Truthanado 21:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Mmbabies 9/4 Vandalism

Can you see about protecting the redirects KRIV-TV and KFTH as part of the Houston semi-protect wall? He decided to use them last night to insert junk since he can't go into the articles themselves. Nate 10:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting it, Nate. I've semi-protected, as you suggested. I sure wish this guy would give up already. Firsfron of Ronchester 15:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Alternate WITI 2003 Logo.png

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Alternate WITI 2003 Logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Mario images

Hi. I don't think any of the mario images can be speedy-deleted as spam. Though I'll concede that they should probably be deleted as not conforming to the policy on non-free images. I have reverted all the db-spam tags. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 11:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Kids' WB

That's fine, just cite your source. Matty-chan 11:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

NBC Flag Bug

Do you still have the NBC Flag Bug? —68.88.226.136 21:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

WCKG

Your reasoning for making an edit on the WCKG article is incorrect. The station has never previously been known as WCFS, nor is it a Low-Power radio station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.67.94.238 (talk) 03:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Correct, to the effect that there are instances of an LPFM and a commercial, standard FM having the same calls. Incorrect, in that your statement in this article would lead a reader to believe that the WCFS calls have ALWAYS been on 105.9 in Chicago, hence my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.67.94.238 (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I added a brief explanation at the end of the paragraph regarding the pending new calls that clarifies the situation.

User:QU109999

If you are an admin, I think youshould block QU109999.First, he is only using the account for vandalism.second, he has vandalized his talk page 2 times.IslaamMaged126 (talk) 22:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks.I posted another message to him to advise him not to blank warnings off his talk page.Do you think thats ok?IslaamMaged126 (talk) 22:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive_1&oldid=1190253809"