User talk:Msh317

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Msh317, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Qrsdogg (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Viktor Petrik[edit]

Hi again,

Thanks for your comments about the article. I have no personal animosity towards Petrik, I'm just going off the articles that I've found about him. I can't read Russian, so I may have overlooked relevant articles in Russian language publications. Generally the Wall Street Journal is a Reliable Source, but all papers do make mistakes. It is important, however, to supply 3rd party media sources when challenging information in an article because Wikipedia policy does not allow the inclusion of Original Research in articles.

If you find my stance unreasonable, the best place to bring up your issues with the article have problems with the content of the article is the Biography Noticeboard so that other uninvolved editors can examine the issues with the article. Thanks, Qrsdogg (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yinager Dessie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Spock (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yinager Dessie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Spock (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

🛈 Please talk to Seraphimblade, the deleting administrator, if you disagree with the deletion. You can do so by clicking here.
Please note that, while Uncle Spock has requested the deletion, it wasn't Uncle Spock who actually deleted the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just to follow up. If your discussion with the deleting admin is not satisfactory, you can request a WP:deletion review by following these instructions. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration removed[edit]

Hello Msh317,

🛈 Please talk to Seraphimblade, the deleting administrator, if you disagree with the deletion. You can do so by clicking here.

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Grievances about the actions of an administrator (like their decision to block an editor, or protect or delete a page) should also be approached in the first instance on the administrator's talk page, but administrators are expected to be accountable and you can ask on the administrators' incidents noticeboard for the action to be reviewed. In the case of deletions by deletion discussion, you can also open a deletion review.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mark (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]