User talk:Nok32uk

Linking to people[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for your article about The Grimleys. Just a quick note that if you're linking to people, please don't italicis their names - just putting double square brackets around the name is enough. --Whouk (talk) 15:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fully Booked[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Fully Booked, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Whouk (talk) 15:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stephen_Merchant.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen_Merchant.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.

Julia Roberts (QVC Presenter)[edit]

I have placed a tag on the article Julia Roberts (QVC Presenter), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Julia Roberts (QVC Presenter) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Julia Roberts (QVC Presenter). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not just remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- Powers 02:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daz Simpson article[edit]

Please respond to my comments on Talk:Daz Sampson. ThomasHarte 17:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing talk page comments[edit]

Hi, Nok32uk. Please don't remove other users' comments from talk pages -- even this one. It's considered vandalism. Thanks! Powers 13:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Bowen[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jim Bowen on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mr. Lefty 23:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ricky_gervais1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ricky_gervais1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as above, Image:Rickyjane.jpg does not contain information about its source and copyright holder. It may soon be deleted if this info can not be discovered. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. ×Meegs 08:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Rickyjane1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rickyjane1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Itvfromhell.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Itvfromhell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Itvfromhell.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Itvfromhell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Roberts (QVC presenter)[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Julia Roberts (QVC presenter), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sissy and Ada[edit]

I have nominated Sissy and Ada, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sissy and Ada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Nok32uk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Andrea Green - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Patdue1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Patdue1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bulldog Nation[edit]

The article Bulldog Nation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]