User talk:Penguinparty01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Penguinparty01, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Penguinparty01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fast ForWord has been reverted.
Your edit here to Fast ForWord was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/archive2?journalId=733&paperId=2683) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Fast ForWord shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hi Penguinparty01. You posted a COI edit request at Talk:Fast ForWord in this diff.

Would you please disclose the relationship with Fast ForWord ‎that is generating the conflict of interest? Please also disclose if you are being paid, or expect to be paid, for editing Wikipedia. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]