User talk:Piandme

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Piandme. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 17:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Piandme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am absolutely devastated by this result, and didnt expect it at all. I have alreday said I haven't done it, so I don't know what to say really. I will say that once I return I will no longer cease to edit Game of Thrones articles, as I feel I have been set up here. I will of course abide by the rules for them, but I did mention I was going to stop to prevet this srt of aggro. That is out of the question now, unfortinately. I realise I have offered no defence here, but that is only because I didn't do it, and I still don't uderstand how you can believe I did, but keep the ban if you want. I am gutted, but there is nothing I can do Piandme (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were using an alternate account; this is confirmed by a checkuser and by behavioral evidence. This is the second time you've been caught doing this. You say "there is nothing you can do"; that's not exactly true. You can simply stop using undisclosed alternate accounts to continue problematic behavior. Kuru (talk) 21:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A message from Piandme[edit]

Unfortunately, I have been blocked for an indefinte period, because of a troll who hijacked an issue I was having with an administrator. I have decided to lay low until the new year, but I will be back with a new account. I haven't created the account yet, but when I do I will post a message here, but I will only be able to answer via e-mail to prevent the account being blocked straight away. This is obviously not idea, but take a look at my history and feel free to continue the sort of edits I did. The edits here were not an issue, t was this troll. Piandme (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because of this edit, I have removed your ability to edit your talk page while blocked. You may appeal your block to the ban appeals committee or via UTRS. Tiptoety ^talk 05:56, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toby Sebastian (December 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toby Sebastian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Piandme, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narcos (January 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Philroc was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Narcos instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Narcos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phil roc^{My contribs} 21:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Toby Sebastian concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Toby Sebastian, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Toby Sebastian[edit]

Hello, Piandme. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Toby Sebastian".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Toby Sebastian}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:31, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Narcos[edit]

Hello, Piandme. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Narcos".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Narcos}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]