User talk:Poetfount

Comments at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SPOC (Small Private Online Course)[edit]

I've fixed some of your formatting for you, but the main thing I'd suggest now is that you take the several references you have which are not yet footnoted, and turn them into footnote citations. Either ones that add new cited facts, or reinforce facts already in the article.

I'd also make it clearer in the first sentence or two as to what year this concept began to emerge, and/or the term SPOC came into popular usage.

Overall you're pretty solid, though it wouldn't hurt to add a slightly wider body of news sources, but looking good so far. Just a little reinforcing on references and you should be golden. Nice work thus far, but for your next article keep in mind the formatting techniques you're learning and I've tweaked for you for future reference. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Small private online course was accepted[edit]

Small private online course, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shii (tock) 23:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Ronz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 20:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1] That is exactly what I'm concerned about. --Ronz (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. [2] --Ronz (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OER inquiry[edit]

Hi Poetfount, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]