User talk:Robmicklethwaite

Welcome!

Hello, Robmicklethwaite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Back In The Day (Christina Aguilera (song)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Back In The Day (Christina Aguilera (song). Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Extraordinary Machine 20:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced material

Hello. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Christina Aguilera and Back to Basics re-release (Christina Aguilera album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ward3001 20:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This source fails verifiability because it has no information about Christina Aguilera or the album. Ward3001 20:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Basics re-release (Christina Aguilera album)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Back to Basics re-release (Christina Aguilera album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ward3001 21:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Down Baby

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Slow Down Baby. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 16:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Christina Aguilera discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast 17:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of honorific titles in popular music, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 16:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]