User talk:Roguana
Please feel free to leave a message to discuss Wiki-related stuff, but be warned that I do not suffer fools gladly. And yes...that means YOU!
Re: Gandhi[edit]
- nothing wrong with these details/sources as per admins' noticeboard discussion
Clearly, a false edit summary, as I explained what was wrong with them and you ignored the explanation. Viriditas (talk) 00:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely for the abuse of multiple accounts per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Particled. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Roguana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My account has been blocked indefinitely by an admin who claims that I have been using multiple accounts which is not true. No evidence has been presented to me, just my account being blocked completely out of the blue. I don't know if this is a mistake or not but I'd be grateful if another admin could look into this matter. Thank you.
Decline reason:
Not a mistake; you are making the same edits and at the same IP as the other account. The details are linked in the block message above. Kuru (talk) 23:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Roguana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There is no policy that states Wikipedia users cannot use a shared IP address or users of that address cannot edit the same articles. I do not have more than one account and I can see no evidence that proves otherwise. Shared or similar IP addresses are not uncommon for people in large households or small companies or people who use community web access points. I use all three of these. In my household alone there are seven people, at least four of which I know use Wikipedia (myself, my husband, and my two eldest children, plus all of our various guests). I never log in to read Wikipedia but whenever I edit, which is fairly rarely, I log into my account. In addition, none of the edits I have ever made are disruptive in any way so I would still like to know why my account has been blocked. Roguana (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
CheckUser data is, in this case, unambiguous. The three accounts are either being operated by the same person or under the direction of the same person. —DoRD (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Roguana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(Please read the above first) That is not the case, as I have already explained. People using a shared IP address does not necessarily mean they are one and the same person or being directed by one person, even if they edit the same article and share the same opinions. It may suggest that they know each other and may have discussed an issue on Wikipedia, but that is probably the case for thousands of editors who discuss Wikipedia articles in person, by e-mail, or some other method. Yes, I do know the other two editors (one of whom is my son), and after he asked me to read an article he had made an edit to we do share the same view about it, but that is not proof that one editor is unduly influencing the other. But by trying to assert this, you are thereby inventing a rule where people in the same house, office, school, or other shared IP spot are prohibited from editing the same articles - whether they know each other or not. If my intention was sock/meat puppetry then I would simply create another account instead of going to the trouble of having this block removed which was unfairly placed. I would also like to state again that none of the edits I have ever made have been disruptive in any way. If you want to look at meatpuppetry though, I suggest looking no further than the editors Morphh and Arzel (the latter of whom filed this report in the first place because he was edit-warring on the article Orson Scott Card). These two editors have a history of edit-warring, and dozens and dozens of intersecting article edits showing a clear right-wing bias and, on this article in particular, an obvious attempt at tag-teaming. Roguana (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Well, that's the thing. If you're on the same device, on the same IP address, editing the same article, with the same opinions, you basically are one person for Wikipedia editing purposes. We assume good faith on Wikipedia, and maybe you really are a house of people with the same opinions and the same editing habits, but when you are editing in the same place with the same objectives and the same checkuser information, you will need to behave - and you will be treated - as if you are one person, because you are entirely indistinguishable from being one person. It can be an inconvenience, but it's how things work here. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Roguana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(see above) I was unaware that users who use the same IP address have to declare it on their talk pages via a userbox, but I've openly declared it in the discussion above. I'm happy to use one of the userboxes, but when all the circumstances are taken into consideration I still don't think that my account needs to be blocked. Roguana (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have said nothing new, and your repeated unblock requests have become abusive. I am therefore revoking your talk page access. Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Well why don't you just eat my sh¡t then instead, since you're obviously already full of it.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.