User talk:Rwboa22

Welcome!

Hello, Rwboa22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 03:52, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 4 Seasons (aka The Four Seasons)[edit]

It appears you made an edit on the Frankie Valli article regarding the section on associated acts. I don't know of any instance where the group called itself, on record or CD, "The Four Season featuring Frankie Valli", and, you deleted the reference to "The 4 Seasons", which was the original name of the group (check their albums out from the beginning through the 70s). If you'd like to explore the matter further or enlighten me to the correctness of your edit, I'm happy to hear about it. At this time, I removed your edit and replaced with the original info. Thank you. Bbrownlie (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)bbrownlie[reply]

WYSP[edit]

Thanks for catching the comments at the top...I didn't see them when I put in the format change. Johnska7 13:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orion 13[edit]

Thank you for improving and creating Orion mission articles. I have made some modifications to LSAM 3, LSAM 2 should do an Apollo 10 type mission around the Moon.Hektor 18:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Scouts (Boy Scouts of America) Local Links[edit]

Hi, RW: Please don't remove merger tag until there is some consensus, especially as I do not understand how this merits a seperate article compared to the existant Sea Scout article. Let the merge request stay until such time as a consensus is reached. Cheers V. Joe 17:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VNA[edit]

Howdy. Appears kind of obvious what is now happening with Televue dumping Vixen products, but was there an actual announcement or similar? Just wondering where you got the date October 1. 59.167.60.90 11:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superstreet example[edit]

Hello. I recently undid some edits referring to superstreet roadway geometry along US 301 in Maryland and I noticed that you had contributed to that portion of the article. Please see my post to the article's discussion page and feel free to add that information back in should you be able to provide any specific examples. Thanks! --Thisisbossi 03:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referenced information on astronomy articles[edit]

I see that you are making a lot of comments about your own personal observations on nearby galaxies with your 12" Dobsonian telescope. Regardless of whether your comments are more accurate than the Wikipedia articles, you will need referenced information if you want to change the articles. Otherwise you may run afoul of Wikipedia's "no original research" policy. If you change the amateur astronomy information in the articles, please find referenced information to support the changes. (I myself would like to talk about things like the extended dust emission in NGC 3031 that is visible in Spitzer Space Telescope images, but I need to publish a paper before I can add information to the Wikipedia article.) Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 22:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subpages[edit]

Per WP:StS I have changed your userbox to a subpage at: User:Rwboa22/Astrology and took your page out of template categories. -PatPeter 19:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Max Launch Abort System‎[edit]

Your new article is lacking your source and references. I suggest you add your source(s) in asap before another editor or 'auto-bot' marks your article for deletion. Also, you are lacking categories and internal links to other wiki-articles. You can't stop now. Best regards, LanceBarber (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly reminder[edit]

		Edit summary reminder
		Hello. I noticed that your edit to Skylab Rescue did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, -MBK₀₀₄ 21:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Interstate Highways in Pennsylvania[edit]

I was wondering if you could add some sources to the construction info you added, unless it is on the PA Highways website, but I couldn't find anything on 195 there. I'm also trying to get it to feature status and could use some help and advice if you know anything about it. Deigo (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of In-flight aborts and rescue options[edit]

I have nominated In-flight aborts and rescue options, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In-flight aborts and rescue options. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. G W… 10:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Philadelphia slang[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Philadelphia slang. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philadelphia slang. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lamokin Street (SEPTA station) info[edit]

Where did you get your data on the former Lamokin Street (SEPTA station)? It was recently tagged as being unreferenced, and I'd like to give the article less of a reason to have that tag. ----DanTD (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Philadelphia Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chartreuse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orion 3[edit]

The article Orion 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Since Constellation never came to fruition and hence its Orion 3 mission became an obscure footnote, the real satellite is a good candidate for primary topic, with the addition a hatnote for the list of cancelled Constellation missions. A full-blown disambiguation page is no longer required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. W. D. Graham 14:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swampoodle Connection[edit]

The article Swampoodle Connection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No proof that this was a real proposal

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mackensen (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rwboa22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rwboa22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rwboa22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Interstate 101" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Interstate 101 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 6#Interstate 101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Delaware Route 1A[edit]

The article Delaware Route 1A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Frankly untotable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. That guy who plays games (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]