User talk:Shaktisviolin

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Shaktisviolin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stuttering Hexagon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stuttering Hexagon[edit]

The article Stuttering Hexagon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Paid, promotional article lacks third-party sources or evidence of notability per WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you tell me what you mean by "paid, promotional article lacks third-party sources or evidence of notability". I don't know what "paid, promotional article" means. This is my first article and I didn't realize that I needed mostly third-party sources, but since that time, I am adding more notable verification. I am now working to improve the links of the articles I want to present. The British Stammering Assn. is redoing its website and many of my links don't work, so I am having trouble with that. I tried to find Logical Cowboy's page and I guess I don't know how to find it because it didn't seem to be working. Would you please give me a chance to improve this, since it is my first article? I'm working really hard at it. The Stuttering Community has been using this theory for a long time...more than 30 years ....and others have been helped with their stuttering as I have. There are no scientific cures for stuttering to date but this point of view changed my speech. (Shaktisviolin (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of Stuttering Hexagon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuttering Hexagon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuttering Hexagon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Stuttering Hexagon has many academic sources.  Will add sources and correct listed sources if allowed during this discussion. (Shaktisviolin (talk) 13:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

COI[edit]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 23:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]