User talk:StAnselm/2020

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     2020   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  19 -  20 -  21 -  22 -  23 -  24 -  ... (up to 100)


Orphaned non-free image File:Emmanuel Christian School logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuel Christian School logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic vs Roman Catholic, Justification Page

Hello!

I was the one who had attempted to make the "Roman Catholic" to "Catholic" change. The argument has effectively already been made in the following page...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_(term)

The Holy See itself refers to the Church, as it historically had in the early centuries, as the Catholic Church.

If there is further consensus that needs to be gained, how may I go about doing so? (I'm new to the entire Wikipedia arena)

Thanks! Patriotic524 (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If necessary, I can also provide evidence that even in the Early Church, other Christian groups differentiated themselves in name from the Catholic Church. Patriotic524 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would also point out this article as well. Please see the "Churches" tab.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_particular_churches_and_liturgical_rites#Latin_(Western)_rites Patriotic524 (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The point regarding the Justification (theology) article is that Lutheran and Reformed Christians regard themselves as "catholic" too, so in an article comparing different views they need to be properly distinguished. StAnselm (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Eg the Anglican Communion. I find the title of Portal:Catholic Church NPOV. And see Catholic Church (disambiguation) which clearly uses the term to refer to other denominations. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vanessa Kensington.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vanessa Kensington.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vocus Group logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vocus Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"America (Song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect America (Song). Since you had some involvement with the America (Song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 21:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
You dis-ambiguate like a Ninja. And every article you seem to touch ends up more finely balanced than before. We all salute you. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 00:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Belgrave Heights Christian School logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Belgrave Heights Christian School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Klaas Schilder.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Klaas Schilder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aria Montgomery.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aria Montgomery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"DJH" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DJH. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 14#DJH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ragetti and Pintel.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ragetti and Pintel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

What an amazing account you have. You've contributed so much Christian knowledge to the online world. I'm blown away! Cbowsie (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! StAnselm (talk) 12:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Question From a Journalist

I'm doing a story for Gizmodo on how editors monitor pronoun changes on Wikipedia. I've noticed you've contributed to a few pages by contributing the correct pronouns for folks who transitioned later in life/were known by their dead names during their professional lives. I'd love to set up a chat if you're interested in speaking. My email is henry.giardina@gmail.com. Please feel free to reach out, and keep up the great work!

-H — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgiardina (talk • contribs) 18:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Following up on this-- would you be willing to do a brief interview with me? Let me know, and best,

Henry Giardina

@Hgiardina: I appreciate the invite, but no thanks. StAnselm (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melbourne College of Divinity logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melbourne College of Divinity logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A heads-up

You recently applied a {{db-repost}} to Derek Chauvin. This speedy tag is only supposed to be used for repostings, not brand new versions of previously deleted articles.

If you aren't sure this is not a brand new or substantially changed version of the older article I suggest you withdraw your speedy. If you really think this new version also merits deletion would you please consider initiating your concerns in a new AFD? Geo Swan (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have now simply reverted back to the redirect. Of course, not being an admin, I have no way of knowing how similar the new version is to the deleted version. But the consensus was clear that there should not be an article about this person. StAnselm (talk) 23:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not to put too fine a point on it, but you are tacitly acknowledging that your speedy tag was a lapse from policy. Please never do this again. Geo Swan (talk) 23:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The end result certainly needs to be a redirect to the main article. The only question is whether the revision history needs to be deleted. StAnselm (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused, though - are you suggesting the article should be kept? StAnselm (talk) 23:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • BLP1E is routinely misinterpreted. It doesn't say that every single individual who is known primarily for their involvement in a single event should have our coverage of them shoehorned into an article on that event. Yet people routinely act as if this is what it says. BLP1E explicitly says when the individual's role is central to the event a standalone article may be justified. Killing of George Floyd is already too large. I made a bunch of edits to it today, and kept bumping up against edit conflicts, as other people worked on different aspects of the article.
There is information we should cover that would be off topic for Killing of George Floyd. Kellie Chauvin filed divorce papers against Derek. She was getting death threats. Does that really belong in KoGF?
Do the 17 previous disciplinary events in Chauvin's police dossier really belong in KoGF?
No, they do not. In my opinion all four officers may merit stand alone articles. In my opinion George Floyd merits a stand alone article as well. Geo Swan (talk) 23:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your courtesy blanking of Derek Chauvin

Could you please go to Talk:Derek Chauvin and explain the basis of your courtesy blanking? Geo Swan (talk) 23:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is much more detailed and contains real content instead of a pure BLP violation like the Derek Chauvin (police officer) article. Both WP:1E ("If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." and WP:CRIME ("The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event") allows such articles. We're talking about a monumental incident that has sparked mass protests, rioting and political unrest nationwide and worldwide. It's obvious that Derek Chauvin, whose actions are behind all of it, is worthy of an article of his own. Se James Holmes (mass murderer) and Dylann Roof as examples of BLPs allowed for perpetrators of high-profile crimes.Kebabpizza (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Weread logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weread logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, StAnselm! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

  • Easy to use - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times.
  • Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks.
  • Making life easier on the battlefield - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted.
  • Rollback previews - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left.
  • Always the latest revision - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors.
  • Fast - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template.
  • Built on your feedback - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say!
  • and many more features ...but I don't want to fill your userpage.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 50 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 14:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabor College Australia logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tabor College Australia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Question From a Journalist

Hi!

I'm doing a story for Gizmodo on how editors monitor pronoun changes on Wikipedia. I've noticed you've contributed to a few pages by contributing the correct pronouns for folks who transitioned later in life/were known by their dead names during their professional lives. I'd love to set up a chat if you're interested in speaking. My email is henry.giardina@gmail.com. Please feel free to reach out, and keep up the great work!

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Stuart University logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mainland exceptionalism

is much more complicated than appears in the being left off the map article - please note that 2014+ is but a pin prick on the big arse of australian history - careful examination of the record even might find some more gems... JarrahTree 02:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Galaxy Resources logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy Resources logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dale Martin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prisencolin (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Orphaned non-free image File:Asian Seminary of Christian Ministries logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asian Seminary of Christian Ministries logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandemic game.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandemic game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Galaxy Resources logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy Resources logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:7 wonders board game cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:7 wonders board game cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"National Church"

You reverted my edit of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina, arguing that there was no evidence that the tension between the diocese was with the (international) Episcopal Church. I think this is based on a misunderstanding. While the term "national church" is common, it is also misleading. See Province 9 of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America and Province 2 of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America -- you will find that Haiti and Europe, Ecuador and Venezuela, are every bit as much a part of the Episcopal Church with which South Carolina had tensions as the Central Gulf Coast or Chicago. Do you have a specific problem with the term "larger Episcopal Church as a whole"? Is there a reason to emphasize the national (i.e. specifically U.S.) character of the tensions, and to imply that the tensions were not with the Episcopal Church in the British Virgin Islands, but only with that part of the Episcopal Diocese of the Virgin Islands located in formerly Danish colonies (purchased by the US in 1917)?--Bhuck (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. I think "national" was there to indicate that it wasn't a tension with the wider Anglican Communion. StAnselm (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did not intend to imply that the tension was with the wider Anglican Communion, though of course there were plenty of tensions within the Anglican Communion as well, but those are the subjects of other articles. I have deleted other references to the "national church" now, and replaced them with phrases more specific to the Episcopal Church within and outside US borders. In one place there was a reference to disagreements with "national developments" which could have implied secular politics as well, though of course those were not meant. I don't think the controversy is about nationalism or patriotism at all. I did, however, leave the reference to a national church in the article about the history before 2012, where it refers to the founding of the Episcopal Church as a national church, because at that time, in the late 18th century, the issue was one of "dissolving the bands which have connected" one people to another, and there were no Episcopal Churches in Ecuador, Taiwan or Italy at the time, as there are today.--Bhuck (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StAnselm/2020&oldid=1114266690"