User talk:Sulpicius

Welcome!

Hello, Sulpicius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay 08:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there...[edit]

I've noticed your edits recently. You have been here for a little while now. Ever thought of making a user page? Just curious. See you around. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 02:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Ezulezians...

Hi, me and my team of guys are the ones constantly erasing your contributions about Euzealian society. The reason why we keep on deleting it is that although the organization is chartered by name it is dead by de facto. Having known many who are "technically part of the Euzealian society", they self-admit that it is more or less inactive. Including a description of Euzealian in the current context would therefore be pointless, possibly even an effort to defame the University. Therefore it would be irrelevant to any description of Wake Forest. That is why we constantly take it off. Please take into consideration our concept.--Charhally 06:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Edwards: legal academic[edit]

If you check out the page for the category you removed, you'll see that it says at the top: "This category is for individuals who have taught at law schools in the United States." John Edwards qualifies under those standards. I don't think it's a big deal, but I see no reason why it should be removed. Maximusveritas 22:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me just explain myself: I removed the category because it is my understanding that Senator Edwards does not actually teach a course at the law school or anywhere else. (One cannot, it seems, take Course X with "Professor Edwards.") Rather he runs an institute associated with the law school. My search of the UNC Law website appears to confirm this -- i.e., that he does not teach a course and thus does not qualify for this category, as it is currently defined. I still think he does not properly belong in this category, but it's not one of those things that really bothers me. Thanks.

Thanks for your explanation. The reason I thought he taught there was because I saw this article which called it a "teaching position" and this one which said he would be doing some "guest teaching". Now that I've looked again, I do see some articles describing it as more of an executive or administrative position and I could not find an article saying that he had actually taught a class yet. So, I guess I was wrong. Sorry about that and thanks for clearing it up for me. Maximusveritas 01:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Sulpicius! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 872 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Harold G. Maier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]