User talk:Tim Bosnia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tim Bosnia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Murder of Tim Bosma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! David.moreno72 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Murder of Tim Bosma"[edit]

Murder of Tim Bosma, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a recreation of content previously deleted following a deletion discussion.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Tim Bosnia", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the name of a notable deceased person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. z331dot (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not threaten to kill me. I do not know of any famous deceased person named Mr. Bosnia. If there is, it is unintentional. Tim Bosnia (talk) 03:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who is threatening to kill you(certainly not me) but I apologize for my error. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the clarification. I didn't want to be killed in order to make your statement true, that my name was a deceased person's name. Tim Bosnia (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tim Bosma. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 13:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See user:Softlavender. He taught me this. I am copying him.

You should not fight perceived edit warring with edit warring; there are proper processes to deal with edit warring(though I would beware of the boomerang effect. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tim Bosma. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD is closed but some people are reopening it. They should be banned.

You have been asked multiple times to stop reverting the discussion, and to discuss it on the AFD's talk page. This is disruptive, and will not result in the issue being resolved; it will only prolong it. Thank you for understanding. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was closed after four days with an unclear consensus at best. Most AFDs run at least a month. 331dot (talk) 13:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 13:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Widr, I am sorry but loom at Softlavender, an edit warrior.