User talk:YaBoi27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dan D. Ric. An edit that you recently made to List of animal classes seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dan D. Ric (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of animal classes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan D. Ric (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YaBoi27, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi YaBoi27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to August 27 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Frankie Muniz. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not reference yourself with your own edits. Wikipedia should not be used as a source for itself. Kosack (talk) 06:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]