Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/The X-Files (season 6)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The X-Files (season 6)[edit]

Contributor(s): Gen. Quon, Trust Is All You Need

I believe this topic meets the requirements as it is a listing of all the episodes that aired during the television series' sixth season, which limits it to a well-defined scope. The articles follow a solid formation and bear close structural resemblance to each other. In addition, the individual episode pages read as clearly related articles meant to be viewed in a series, but also stand on their own and present their information without expecting the reader to understand the topic as a whole.--Gen. Quon (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I reviewed a good few of these articles at GA, and they're all of a high standard. I'm happy to support this as a topic. GRAPPLE X 19:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I found a couple of dead links in these and tagged them. Additionally Triangle (The X-Files), has several links to password-protected files ([lib.ku.edu]). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry about the dead links, those were in articles that had already been GA'd before I started. I believe I've fixed them. Also, are links that require subscriptions bad? All the ones that are password-protected are from Databases of newspaper archives, so I can remove the url if need be.--Gen. Quon (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Can't remember if I helped with any of those, but impressive indeed. Grapple X will also be proud. igordebraga 17:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Reviewed a couple of these myself; impressive. Glimmer721 talk 21:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Question, though: Why are the articles bulleted? Usually : is used instead of *. Glimmer721 talk 01:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support complete and meets the criteria. Arsenikk (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I went through and made sure all the references had correct publishers, and I tidied the info boxes and made minor fixes to every article.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 11:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closed with consensus to promote. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]