Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Sword of Shannara/1

The Sword of Shannara[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept, no consensus for delisting Hardcore Metallica Fan (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting that a GA reassessment be done on Sword of Shannara. Rationale: there has been a lot of water under the bridge since it became GA in 2008, many subsequent edits, and Wikipedia standards for sources and general notability have changed considerably since 2008. Cheers. N2e (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to point out the unreliable sources present in the article? I mean, now that the unreliable sources you added and one other are now removed. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 16:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up that text following the Merge! I certainly had no intentionality in adding any unreliable sources; I merely completed a Merge that had been the consensus of a recent AfD (and that source article seems to have had a number of non-WP:RS sources) in it). I have removed that part of my comment above. I have no particular problem with any particular sources that are currently in the article now.

I continue to think that the article should have a GA reassessment six years on, for the other reasons I've stated above. I'll also add one more: it appears that the Plot summary is rather excessively long, per WP:Plot summary. I won't tag the article with {{plot}} however, and will just leave it to other GA reviewers to evaluate the article against all current GA criteria. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demote due to prose issues. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per bad-faith nomination. Even if the plot summary is a a bit lengthy, that's not a large enough problem to warrant demotion. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]