User talk:Nosehillbranch

Patrick O'Luanaigh[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Patrick O'Luanaigh. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello Nosehillbranch, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Nosehillbranch, good luck, and have fun. --RashersTierney (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Patrick O'Luanaigh[edit]

I have nominated Patrick O'Luanaigh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick O'Luanaigh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Brianga (talk) 22:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prods[edit]

Note that there is no expectation that WP:BEFORE applies to prods or speedy deletions, only to AfD's. Removing prods from a variety of articles without improving the articles is not particularly helpful, as it merely forces another editor to do the AfD nomination. Jclemens (talk) 22:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Also, which part of WP:BEFORE are you alleging these prods violated? "No assertion of notability" is in fact a perfectly reasonable justification for a prod. Orderinchaos 20:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do editors get their kicks out of serially deprodding and generally disrupting? Drmies (talk) 03:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azviz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. DreamGuy (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]