Jump to content

BN-800 reactor: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 September 2024

8 September 2024

31 July 2024

30 July 2024

28 July 2024

17 July 2024

2 June 2024

24 January 2024

23 January 2024

16 December 2023

11 December 2023

22 November 2023

16 November 2023

21 September 2023

22 June 2023

  • curprev 17:5217:52, 22 June 2023 137.25.57.232 talk 11,220 bytes +150 Correct "essentially the same design as EBR-II." According to Dr. Yoon Il Chang, Chief Engineer of EBR-II, the similarity ends with both being of the sodium pool type. undo

31 May 2023

10 January 2023

24 December 2022

3 December 2022

  • curprev 20:2420:24, 3 December 2022 U.Balzani talk contribs m 11,018 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
  • curprev 20:1920:19, 3 December 2022 U.Balzani talk contribs 11,019 bytes +234 There you go, also stop it with your silly behaviour. I should say that "Science requires references" and I in fact did it this October. By reversing the burden of proof you just showed that you missed how science works: if you affirm it is IV-Gen you must prove it, if you can't justify your claim it must belong to a previous generation. Also, IV-Gen requires low financial risk; prototype NPPs cannot achieve this by definition: an experimental reactor has the associated risks of uncertainty. undo
  • curprev 12:1812:18, 3 December 2022 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 10,785 bytes +19 Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} undo
  • curprev 10:1710:17, 3 December 2022 79.25.138.228 talk 10,766 bytes +19 then, add a reference from GIF, IAEA or other world renowned nuclear associations where is clearly stated that the BN-800 is a gen III+ reactor. It's not enough to state that is a gen III+ merely on the basis that you don't agree with my references and therefore for you it's not a gen IV reactor. Science requires references, not "for me it's like this" undo

30 November 2022

  • curprev 07:3707:37, 30 November 2022 U.Balzani talk contribs 10,747 bytes −364 Undid revision 1124589376 by 95.252.255.162 (talk). From the provided links : gen-4.org-gif-tru2014.pdf says that BN-800 is built for R&D purposes (i.e. to study what IV Gen could be, not to be of IV Gen... it is unlogic to say that it is already what it should develop) and world-nuclear.org-generation-iv-nuclear-reactors.aspx only states that it is an operational SFR like there have been from decades... Not IV Gen. undo Tags: Undo references removed

29 November 2022

  • curprev 13:4713:47, 29 November 2022 95.252.255.162 talk 11,111 bytes +364 IT IS a gen IV as stated in GIF publications, and by the World Nuclear Association, and literally one of the six types recognized by GIF as gen IV (SFR reactor). BN-800 is a prototype gen IV, but IS STILL a gen IV (not available for commercial purposes, that will be the BN-1200). Stop spreading misinformation please Balzani. undo Tag: Reverted

28 November 2022

5 November 2022

23 October 2022

21 October 2022

16 October 2022

15 October 2022

14 October 2022

11 October 2022

6 October 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)