Jump to content

SEIU 32BJ: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 November 2024

5 November 2024

26 October 2023

9 February 2023

29 September 2022

7 April 2022

5 April 2022

29 March 2022

  • curprev 21:0721:07, 29 March 2022 Avatar317 talk contribs 5,780 bytes −8,372 Undid revision 1079960684 by JECE (talk)Wikipedia is not built by people who claim to be experts. That's why we have WP:V, so that ANY editor can verify that statements are true or not. I removed UNSOURCED and poorly sourced statements; and per WP:ONUS "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." If you feel that these statements belong, then SOURCE THEM. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 15:3115:31, 29 March 2022 JECE talk contribs 14,152 bytes +8,372 Undid revision 1079881245 by Avatar317 (talk) You are clearly not an expert on the subject if you think that this article is full of "alternative facts." As for Wikipedia policy, see WP:NOR: "By 'exists', the community means that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no source is currently named in the article. . . ." undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 04:0604:06, 29 March 2022 Avatar317 talk contribs 5,780 bytes −8,372 Reverting large addition of UNSOURCED content. Please see WP:V. "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." Wikipedia is not the place to create alternative facts. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

25 March 2022

  • curprev 21:3921:39, 25 March 2022 Sumanuil talk contribs 14,152 bytes −32 Merged unions undo Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 21:1121:11, 25 March 2022 JECE talk contribs 14,184 bytes +8,404 Restoring mass deletions of material that could easily be sourced, and some of which actually were sourced. Wikipedia does not require that every statement be sourced. It merely requires that every assertion can be backed up with reliable sources. Case in point, see the reversion of Shortride's edit, which simply mentioned that the NFCO is part of 32BJ. How could that reasonably be described as original research? A simple internet search would back up that claim. undo Tag: Reverted

20 March 2022

13 September 2021

11 September 2021

7 September 2021

24 June 2021

16 June 2021

11 June 2021

9 June 2021

23 May 2021

9 December 2020

29 October 2020

30 March 2020

25 March 2020

24 March 2020

20 February 2020

14 February 2020

24 December 2019

8 October 2019

28 September 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)