Jump to content

Talk:Intel 8086: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 15:4615:46, 10 June 2024 RastaKins talk contribs 69,112 bytes +322‎ →compact encoding inspired by 8-bit processors: Reply undo Tag: Reply

curprev 22:5722:57, 3 February 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 67,103 bytes +26‎ Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

curprev 17:0417:04, 24 November 2023 Bretleduc talk contribs 67,077 bytes +182‎ →CVV: new section undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic

curprev 08:0408:04, 15 May 2023 Dettorer talk contribs 66,895 bytes +1,154‎ →Instructions for nested functions: new section undo Tag: New topic

curprev 18:0018:00, 6 March 2022 GreenC bot talk contribs 65,741 bytes +18‎ Add 1 {{reflist-talk}} (via reftalk bot) undo

curprev 15:5215:52, 28 December 2021 RastaKins talk contribs 65,723 bytes +657‎ →Sample code undo

curprev 18:1118:11, 25 December 2021 RastaKins talk contribs 65,066 bytes +310‎ →BX as index register. undo

curprev 17:5617:56, 26 November 2021 RastaKins talk contribs 64,756 bytes +89‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address undo

curprev 15:2115:21, 24 November 2021 RastaKins talk contribs 64,667 bytes +283‎ Added info on NOP. undo
curprev 03:1403:14, 24 November 2021 Gah4 talk contribs 64,384 bytes +185‎ →Processor Prices: Altair 8800 price undo

curprev 21:2021:20, 23 November 2021 RastaKins talk contribs 64,199 bytes +786‎ The 8086 has a prefetch buffer. undo

curprev 17:3417:34, 2 September 2021 185.5.68.141 talk 63,413 bytes +186‎ →Sample code undo
curprev 17:2617:26, 2 September 2021 185.5.68.141 talk 63,227 bytes +360‎ →Sample code undo

curprev 19:2719:27, 5 August 2021 Wtshymanski talk contribs 62,867 bytes −132‎ rv word salad; not a forum Undid revision 1037114950 by 86.114.245.106 (talk) undo Tag: Undo

curprev 16:1116:11, 4 August 2021 86.114.245.106 talk 62,999 bytes +132‎ →Operating system support: new section undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 06:1406:14, 28 March 2021 Sladen talk contribs 62,867 bytes +810‎ →Not a bug?: Think there are/were three(?) interrupt-related bugs: … undo

curprev 23:2223:22, 7 December 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 62,057 bytes +730‎ →compact encoding inspired by 8-bit processors: new section undo
curprev 23:1223:12, 7 December 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 61,327 bytes +384‎ →Soviet clones: 16% undo
curprev 23:0523:05, 7 December 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 60,943 bytes +226‎ →Small detail: 1/3 undo

curprev 19:0219:02, 26 August 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 60,717 bytes +644‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address: memory write access undo
curprev 18:5818:58, 26 August 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 60,073 bytes +1,307‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address: I have that book! undo
curprev 13:5113:51, 26 August 2020 81.157.153.155 talk 58,766 bytes +145‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address undo
curprev 13:4913:49, 26 August 2020 81.157.153.155 talk 58,621 bytes +1,377‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address undo

curprev 23:2823:28, 25 March 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 50,598 bytes +939‎ →If the 8086 is to retain 8-bit object codes and hence the efficient memory use of the 8080, then it cannot guarantee that (16-bit) opcodes and data will lie on an even-odd byte address: new section undo
curprev 23:2223:22, 25 March 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 49,659 bytes +90‎ →Memory organisation: no undo
curprev 23:1623:16, 25 March 2020 Gah4 talk contribs 49,569 bytes +231‎ →Please clarify: byte addressable 16 bit memory undo

curprev 09:1009:10, 24 January 2020 Moonythedwarf talk contribs 49,338 bytes +40‎ computer hardware tagging spree time undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

curprev 11:1211:12, 25 August 2019 SineBot talk contribs m 49,298 bytes +287‎ Signing comment by 217.103.36.185 - "" undo
curprev 11:1111:11, 25 August 2019 217.103.36.185 talk 49,011 bytes +1,526‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 00:3500:35, 15 March 2019 Jethro 82 talk contribs 47,485 bytes +330‎ →BX as index register.: new section undo

curprev 03:2803:28, 11 July 2018 Gah4 talk contribs 47,155 bytes +341‎ →Truely useful: maybe the 8080 undo
curprev 03:2603:26, 11 July 2018 Gah4 talk contribs 46,814 bytes +421‎ →7.16 MHz: new section undo

curprev 15:0415:04, 22 March 2018 Nwbeeson talk contribs 46,393 bytes +619‎ →Truely useful: new section undo

curprev 01:2601:26, 30 May 2017 Andy Dingley talk contribs 45,774 bytes +135‎ →Please clarify undo
curprev 01:0901:09, 30 May 2017 Family Guy Guy talk contribs 45,639 bytes +221‎ →Please clarify: same text is in the 8088 article undo

curprev 09:3909:39, 15 November 2016 ToaneeM talk contribs 45,418 bytes +643‎ →Variable MN/MX: Added comment. undo

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Intel_8086"