User talk:Threeblur0: Difference between revisions
Threeblur0 (talk | contribs) |
Threeblur0 (talk | contribs) →Improper edit?: discussion not needed for page |
||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
<references/> |
<references/> |
||
== Improper edit |
== Improper edit == |
||
::The use of unproper is and was meant to be equal to the wording you used John, i was raised to refer to the person you are talkng to out of respect.--[[User:Threeblur0|Threeblur0]] ([[User talk:Threeblur0#top|talk]]) 23:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Akron%2C_Ohio&action=historysubmit&diff=335508694&oldid=335507871 This edit] is NOT an "improper" edit. An improper edit would be vandalism or adding a bunch of trivial and/or unsourced info in an article. Remember to avoid mentioning other editors' names in the edit summaries and refrain from making this personal. I don't do that to you. --[[User:JonRidinger|JonRidinger]] ([[User talk:JonRidinger|talk]]) 21:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Johnathon refrain from screaming. The way you left the sentence is improper (unproper was used to emphasize the error). I only mention names of editors who mention mine Johnathon, i dont make it personal, i make it clear, and you are an editors who mentions my name Johnathon. --[[User:Threeblur0|Threeblur0]] ([[User talk:Threeblur0#top|talk]]) 22:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Using all caps in one word is a form of emphasis, not screaming. "Unproper" is not a word, so the only thing it emphasizes is lack of understanding of spelling and grammar, but no my edit of the sentence was not only ''not'' improper, but more correct given the supporting sentences and sources in the paragraph immediately following. And yes, as soon as you mention someone by name in an edit summary, you are making it personal, the same as when you refer to me as "Jonathan" or in this case "Johnathon". It isn't needed and I don't do that to you; all that is needed is a simple edit summary of what you are doing (rewording). I only mention your name on talk pages when I have a point directly to you that could be mistaken for someone else or a general comment; not in edit summaries to point out your mistakes. --[[User:JonRidinger|JonRidinger]] ([[User talk:JonRidinger|talk]]) 23:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:39, 2 January 2010
| Please leave a . |
| This is Threeblur0's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
I am from mars...
SPID: 7841
BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
hQQOAzWmQkC5j9heEBAAlzl5JrEQfM4O/RkumseiSVeI97uBaFMrjlpajc+hPb7c azgnUvhWTqKgoF4vV9Ylv4RXkqY9XLHvlydYwP0DDlH2BcB6AEeup/cLrPTBp77m BNE3fTI/yi9+caZ9hp7jjSh6wmFCTaIYGzTxD6H0G6xHDmzlgBpCKROpqh2Kridg OSGSjfW44CgcbkpmA+Akot/u5OkoDlxjlRiu/8nBDC4AnlwwihLEvHTM6knxPK79 gBT+zP1XOvSRM49rf4nyeg1iTrV5303DoeFGaigxaqjyXc1gw58Bs7d2OH4UAdZS Poi7BWPkSThCjjufcBVIOo3txzSYUr2oTfSHOVhmcowf0vMPU+wupFNK5cV9TM2j mbbze+5iSlzyrMSWE0fBR0NNgag1uYPDH6Yc+mOw3oOTCBMOD+cTrR/3v58F2DpS rgsI+RQK86JqEDi9hmyeaPCgghCQs2dm9AaGan6eYg8IK0IvGW/kmcE7kVVBfIei t/TbhwQST5p5En0mbwKa1OxOA1rt/8Gpzyz8WKV8u76fLXLGahc+3ZmXqz/Fm7wH 7JocW1VocKBc0ygAlCBcYHFgSvpNpV9PHaHtZ8hBWsh/qqS2U01A4yuBBhRNmUaR /tqUsHBSRix+4xE9J2ezLxzS2qz92tVO+R6rxKIMHsdgyFUpUivBo0c45/cRPsQQ AJPmveGUyY+NOsThDpMaifG7cQhl+k/bYoj97QWbQbjA8g3BWz/C9bp/hv6EyJYA qHbcp2rar/39PtNGcy4LPQ3gGXkgkB6vIY3W3QSSZ/Ng6/LVxSX3Of5j4rp7ebYW MH7ZWi0A3z9PTWUKT4emzQYUpM7n5cW0N0oRGf5rT0ZkJlgXTkBV8jCG5v6mHzA0 xkRpP/qMS5fiURUOCivnQPwL9gReNsJLwpoZZ7TFvydzxs4uwanLsFsuzrVmtDnq 3MetmwUAs/fgejojXiP4qAW9aVtvk/3lVWVvC5jrExIgYjxo+gl2pN6LGbvBrIcF i8mAjBpfphYmcBHohBZ/dpXzeCm65POlLYNRyqKaV9qe1j8Uv5sHRvMYz/yaO7f+ YE7sKaiW7A5KQBVYyOD4NAboXCns4fQvslrkm9vak5I5Uh3gscp6FBmQMALGykuH jqnFNKEwG/wzxENUCvR/pPeCBnlV+V1rurTPR014vJg2bsHnn2/7srACqTJJVkcV ZVYfBcxOS4SfgXX0VgR7/6XTGY4bAoyIi9SQ5Dv1/Zcz25FciV1uejIUeeXWTJth OtR+JMkN4AhXQXdOgubb8O/U8AZ89FHvMM+JvPqNB9GJrGQpAzDD2cSejeKqIG/Z iZHt0clLa1UvyJjvyGmo3yJer8mNn2D/p84q0g2Uoe6k0pkBvynw4d/9To4vfeHi tfBm29Jy6FUE9Txv+CZv2vjw2eBvL4sY95hgYfOsBH7wIdm02vXelEquhH29bJhQ Fw1VS/oAt2sCG916ieQ8yvFC3svq4KRZube26h6MrMXQ8YOISPzUylm+glpAskTZ N6hreju6Q7UB/3cLhasFAy0IAETun2/YLaJWispmaC70bC/fMuc2nK3DPUg= =y6MD
END PGP MESSAGE-----
 | Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page. |
Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 23:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Assume good faith again
What part of assume good faith don't you understand? I split Government and crime in the Akron article into two sections because they really didn't go together. I made a judgment call on Plusquellic's citizen's group and put it in the crime section because it relates to crime. Then I see that you moved it back to politics and called what I did a mistake. I don't really care which section it is in, but crime is certainly a reasonable location and calling it a mistake is completely wrong and insulting. --Beirne (talk) 02:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I chcecked all other pages and they dont have data like that in the crime section, plus it's the formation of a group like the city council to help the community, by those reasons i called it a mistake--Threeblur0 (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Then just say say you think it belongs in government because it was a city initiative. Don't make it personal in your comments. I don't say "Removed another one of threeblur's factual errors". --Beirne (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, you're in an endless battle. He's the reason I dropped off wiki after my surgeries. §hepTalk 09:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Culture of Akron, Ohio
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Culture of Akron, Ohio. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture of Akron, Ohio. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Akron, Ohio. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thats what ive been doing, other editors came along and just removed info without using the talkpage for discussion which is how the war started.--Threeblur0 (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I seriously doubt that you agree with me on everything — I largely agree with the other two editors, especially with Jon Ridinger's removal of unsourced information. Nyttend (talk) 03:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that we all needed a break from editing that page, i also agreed with Jon about removing unsourced info so i moved the some i saw out before i knew others got involved and stated that i did in the talkpage. I dont know if you noticed but i was writing you on the talkpage to, the sports part you asked about.--Threeblur0 (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- You must be confused somehow — other than the minor grammar fix, I've not edited this article since August of 2008. Nyttend (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, you asked a question in the edit summary while doing it and i replied to it since no one else seemed to.--Threeblur0 (talk) 19:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that we all needed a break from editing that page, i also agreed with Jon about removing unsourced info so i moved the some i saw out before i knew others got involved and stated that i did in the talkpage. I dont know if you noticed but i was writing you on the talkpage to, the sports part you asked about.--Threeblur0 (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
|
<font=3> Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and all the best in 2010! Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC) | 
|
|---|
Leads
Glad to see some trimming going on with the Akron lead section. Have a look at WP:LEAD as there are lots of essays and other helpful tips and guidelines that can help. Using the NYC article is a good start, but make sure it's not your only standard. Simply being a featured article does not mean the Akron article has to duplicate it, even in length. As WP:LEAD says, the length of the lead is dependent on the length of the article. In essence, the lead should summarize the most important parts of the article and really shouldn't contain any unique information (because of that, the lead doesn't need to be heavily sourced if the info it mentions is sourced in the body of the article). Another move would be to move the origin of the name Akron to the history section. It doesn't need to be first, but should be there rather than the lead (see Chicago for an example). --JonRidinger (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was also thinking that when i was making the edit, but decided to atleast wait to see if my removing of it from the opener would cause conflict with other editors.--Threeblur0 (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well I would support a move like that. The key is putting info in appropriate places and making the lead an intro to the entire article. As I've said several times, the lead is too long, plus it has a lot of unique (but still valid) info that should be elsewhere. --JonRidinger (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
A
References
Improper edit
- The use of unproper is and was meant to be equal to the wording you used John, i was raised to refer to the person you are talkng to out of respect.--Threeblur0 (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)