User talk:Ohconfucius/archive15: Difference between revisions
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Thanks for your note. It was my mistake, my eyes were blurred. ;-) You will have noticed that the other similar links I changed to <nowiki>[[City, State]]</nowiki>. [[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 14:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC) |
*Thanks for your note. It was my mistake, my eyes were blurred. ;-) You will have noticed that the other similar links I changed to <nowiki>[[City, State]]</nowiki>. [[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 14:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Edna Parker and year links== |
|||
I thought you and the others agreed to leave the status quo as-is until the discussion was decided? |
|||
Further, your "final warning" is very flawed and reflective of you, not me. I did NOT revert edits three times in a 24-hour period, so that is a false charge. Further, it is a conflict of interest for you to be both involved in the matter as a point of discussion AND also as a point of enforcing "penalties." In short, it's like trying to win a chess game by knocking the pieces off the board. Cyber-bullying and threats to block are NOT productive and NOT good arguments, either. Far from a WIKI-LAWYERING accusation, it seemed an acceptable and reasonable compromise to link the sentence in the [[Jiroemon Kimura]] article directly to the year 1897, rather than his year-of-birth/year-of-death listing at the top. However, it seems to me that you are more interested in "winning" than being fair, more interested in bullying than being reasonable. As such, I will take this matter to higher authorities.[[User:Ryoung122|<span style="color:red">Ryoung</span><span style="color:blue">122</span>]] 22:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:24, 10 February 2010
![]() | This user is a native of Hong Kong. |
![]() | This user is a citizen of the United Kingdom. |
![]() | This user lives in France. |
![]() |
...
![]() Dashes in article titles
When naming an article, don't use a hyphen as a substitute for an en dash that properly belongs in the title, for example in Eye–hand span. To aid searching and linking, provide a redirect from the corresponding article title with hyphens in place of en dashes, as in Eye-hand span.
Add this to your user page by typing in {{Styletips}} |
![]() |
|
New intro in FG-verse
I know you said that you wanted to distance yourself from the subject for a while, but I have just comprehensively re-written a new intro on Falun Gong. If you have a bit of time please just have one quick look to copyedit and proofread to make sure I have everything right. Thanks! Colipon+(Talk) 23:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I feel I really need to stay away for a while longer, if you don't mind. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
DAB links
Please avoid converting direct links (such as Kent County, Rhode Island) into links to disambiguation pages (such as Kent County). Instead, consider piping the link (as [[Kent County, Rhode Island|Kent County]]) to achieve the desired result without rendering the link less useful. Oddly, you're the second experienced editor this week to make this specific edit to the WLKW article. - Dravecky (talk) 14:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. It was my mistake, my eyes were blurred. ;-) You will have noticed that the other similar links I changed to [[City, State]]. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 14:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Edna Parker and year links
I thought you and the others agreed to leave the status quo as-is until the discussion was decided?
Further, your "final warning" is very flawed and reflective of you, not me. I did NOT revert edits three times in a 24-hour period, so that is a false charge. Further, it is a conflict of interest for you to be both involved in the matter as a point of discussion AND also as a point of enforcing "penalties." In short, it's like trying to win a chess game by knocking the pieces off the board. Cyber-bullying and threats to block are NOT productive and NOT good arguments, either. Far from a WIKI-LAWYERING accusation, it seemed an acceptable and reasonable compromise to link the sentence in the Jiroemon Kimura article directly to the year 1897, rather than his year-of-birth/year-of-death listing at the top. However, it seems to me that you are more interested in "winning" than being fair, more interested in bullying than being reasonable. As such, I will take this matter to higher authorities.Ryoung122 22:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)