User talk:Turian

Today is Monday, September 16, 2024, and the current time is 05:34  EST. There are currently 6,883,327 articles on Wikipedia.

Archives

2009
July • Aug • Sept • Oct • Nov • Dec

2010
Jan • Feb • Mar • Apr

Threads older than 10 days are
archived by MiszaBot III. +

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.

Ronn Torossian

Mosmof is engaged in another of his wars and I notice you battle with him. Can you assist ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babasalichai (talk • contribs) 20:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm not here to be recruiting into matters I don't care about. –Turian (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

List of WWE champions

Per MOS:BOLD "Use italics, not boldface, for emphasis in article text.", and I quote from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of TNA World Tag Team Champions for the Row being colored: per WP:COLORS, colored cells should have accompanying symbols (e.g. * ^ †) for accessibility reasons." by a FLRC Reviewer himself, and he lists List of New Jersey Nets head coaches as an example. Afro (Blah Blah Here) ^{- Afkatk} 22:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Article text ≠ text in tables. Also, I don't give a flying flip about the symbol, but the coloring looks awful. If it is what the norm is, it looks awful. So who do I go to in order to point the finger? –Turian (talk) 23:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

We're just following guidelines dude, so I have no idea who you point the finger to, you can always try to change the guidelines if you disagree, though I don't know where you go to do that. Afro (Blah Blah Here) ^{- Afkatk} 23:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Dwayne

This doesn't fit nicely into the thread on Dwayne's talk page now, so I thought I'd say it here. I apologise for implying you were not familiar with Dwayne's repeated requests. I was mistaken. That's all. :-) --Deskana (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I butted heads with him a little while back, and his page has been on my watchlist ever since. I don't get involved too often, but I just thought I would show it from my point of view. –Turian (talk) 23:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Blocked for 24 hrs for disruptive editing and edit warring

I have unfortunately come to the conclusion that you are not getting the point of how disruptive your actions were over the last 24 hrs, and that you intend to continue disrupting in the future. I am issuing a short block (24 hrs) on your editing.

Regardless of whether the section close was consensus or not, your behavior there and on ANI was atrocious. Lots of editors and administrators tried very hard and in good faith to explain that, and you rejected every reasonable request. It is somewhat confusing to me - you do not have a history of this type of behavior to my knowledge - but there it is. You can't do things like that. It disrupts and disrespects everyone else around you and interferes with everyone's ability to edit Wikipedia.

Please don't do it again.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hrs for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Turian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is absolute rubbish and a clear case of abuse of administrative privileges. This block has no valid basis on anything but the red herrings of an editor who bitched about not getting his way. Edit warring? I reverted two edits. Let's block all other members who have done that! That would leave you with about 100 editors. Also, I intend to continue to disrupt in the future? On what grounds would that be? If you haven't even noticed, I have been ignoring that area for a little bit now, focusing on American Idol. Blocks are meant to be preventative measure, not a punishment for something ("Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users" per WP:BLOCK). –Turian (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declined without review of history due to incivil request. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Explain yourself, Daniel. How else did you want me to say it? –Turian (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Turian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am asking an administrator to follow normal procedures and look at the situation, not what they want to try to label as "incivil" behavior. See my last request for my reasoning. –Turian (talk) 10:00 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Blaming everyone else will get your unblock request declined, simple as that. Please post a request that discusses your behavior and what you will do to avoid the situation that led to your block in the first place. TNXMan 03:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Turian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I never said I was innocent; however, I did state that I was blocked two hours after I had dropped every because I got over it. That is why I said I was punished rather than being prevented from editing. I plan on staying away from and leaving the project. I don't need to be in a project to be helpful (as can be seen by my 5,000+ edits). And I plan on staying away from those users. I still don't believe I should have been blocked, mainly because of what I just said I was going to do... I started two hours before the block even started; if I felt I should have been blocked, then I would not be here. –Turian (talk) 03:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you " plan on staying away from and leaving the project", why do we need to unblock you? Seems like that would help. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.