User talk:Sokac121

Please don't revert editor requests on articles until they have been discussed and resolved. Doing so is considered vandalism. Thanks, kwami (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Again with reverting the 'citation needed' tags. If you keep it up, I'll ask to have you blocked. — kwami (talk) 06:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

VOTE

I just wanted to tell you that you, as it seams, didn't understand well. Kosovo will not be just redirect, Kosovo sill be still main page, with history, culture, demographics, geography, economy and society etc. something like China article. All except politics. Please, correct your vote with few other sentences, in order to make this vote better and more useful. :) If you want any help regarding this, you may ask me. I will try to help you. --Tadija^speaks 08:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Notice of WP:ARBMAC

Please note that the article Croatian language and other articles relating to the Balkans fall under the ruling of WP:ARBMAC. Note in particular Wikipedia:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions, which states

"Any uninvolved administrator may, on their own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if that editor fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, the expected standards of behavior, or the normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; restrictions on reverts; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision."

Repeated blanket reversions, repeatedly and knowingly restoring material with large amounts of poor English and grammatical errors, and repeated introduction of material rejected by consensus all fall below the expected standards of behaviour at this project. Knepflerle (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Croatian language. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Keristrasza (talk) 11:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for further, pursuant to the authority of the Macedonia decision, you are hereby banned from the Croatian language article.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. Courcelles 12:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."