User talk:MightyParty

Welcome!

Hello, Dhruvekhera, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ism schism (talk) 03:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Google Books

Here is a new essay on how to use Google Books as a reference. I hope this is useful. User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes --Diannaa ^(Talk) 15:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that User:Diannaa! its really going to help me with my citations :) Dhruvekhera (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

OK that's it. You admit to sock puppetry and you admit you made a personal almost racist attack. There are also competency issues here. You do not seem to be here to improve the encyclopedia but rather to push a particular point of view. Experienced users and three administrators have tried to give you advice on how to succeed here on Wikipedia to no avail. I am taking away your editing priviledges as I do not think you are getting it. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 17:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing; personal attacks; competency issues; POV edits. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa ^(Talk) 17:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MightyParty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not do it on purpose this is so unfair.....how was I supposed to know you have to be logged on everytime to make edits?? as I said I am new here.I have not made any personal attack on anyone..I said Dirty Jatt( he says hes a Jatt on his page) because the user is doing things in a dirty manner instead of providing more input n citations he blindly removes them or calls them Dubious.Again I have nothing to do with sockpupetry or anything as you can see I clearly admitted after the complaint and said it was a mistake ! I am not hiding anything!! but I do apologize for my language used towards User:Sikh-history in those two words.You should also take into account the editing history of Arora and see how User:Sikh-history contributed and my many requests for discussion"This is the last time I am going remove junk from here. After this I will get blocking" those were his exact words if you look at the editing history on Nov 16.Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on.

Decline reason:

Your request makes a stronger case for continuing the block than lifting it. You freely admit to making a personal attack and don't even seem to care that that might not be a good thing to do. Then, you start complaining about other people. Nope, you're not ready for prime time. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MightyParty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admitted to what I did wrong and I apologized and also said I won't do anything of that sort again.I don't see what else I can say. Dhruvekhera (talk) 20:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

When you say "apologized" do you mean the unblock request above? That's quite the back-handed apology. Quite simply, anyone who calls someone else a "dirty <ethnic group>" is not welcome to edit here.Chaser (talk) 21:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

you registered your account on March 6 this year. Eight months of usage does not qualify you to still call yourself a new user.And eight months is plenty of time for anyone who wants to be a serious contributor here to learn basic wikipedia rules and policy. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes that's true but if you look at my contributions I didn't have much activity until recently and I still have plenty to learn.Dhruvekhera (talk) 21:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Plenty to learn is correct! - You might also want to consider reading some of the policies - WP:OWN and WP:CIVIL would be good considering this diff  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I will look into those thanks but can you look at the user User:Sikh-history he has constantly been after me if you look at his contributions on the Arora page I was improving it with citations etc and he would remove them as he is doing right this moment here this diff because I am blocked(which is what he has been trying to do the past few days).He has removed valid citations just now.I don't want to get into a blame game here but the User:Sikh-history is starting to remove all my citated edits.Dhruvekhera (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

This comment is pure racism. The term "Bangla" is a derogatory term used to describe Bangladeshi people. The term "Dirty Jatt", is a racist term to describe someone to percieved of an inferior racial stock as well. I thought maybe the indefinite block was harsh, but now I think it is totally justified. We don't need racists on Wikipedia. Our job here is hard enough as it is. Thanks --Sikh-History 08:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MightyParty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologized twice "but I do apologize for my language used towards User:Sikh-history in those two words" and then I said "Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on" I called him dirty because he was making the pages messy not because of his ethnic group and the word Jatt is from his user page so I referred to him as that.We are both Indian's from punjab same ethnic stock I don't see how the previous person who denied me my unblock request made it an ethnic issue we are neither black or white.Either way I am very sorry for my language and will not use words like "Dirty" again while referring to others.I will follow all the wiki rules from now on.Dhruvekhera (talk) 21:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologized twice "but I do apologize for my language used towards [[User:Sikh-history]] in those two words" and then I said "Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on" I called him dirty because he was making the pages messy not because of his ethnic group and the word Jatt is from his user page so I referred to him as that.We are both Indian's from punjab same ethnic stock I don't see how the previous person who denied me my unblock request made it an ethnic issue we are neither black or white.Either way I am very sorry for my language and will not use words like "Dirty" again while referring to others.I will follow all the wiki rules from now on.[[User:Dhruvekhera|Dhruvekhera]] ([[User talk:Dhruvekhera#top|talk]]) 21:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologized twice "but I do apologize for my language used towards [[User:Sikh-history]] in those two words" and then I said "Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on" I called him dirty because he was making the pages messy not because of his ethnic group and the word Jatt is from his user page so I referred to him as that.We are both Indian's from punjab same ethnic stock I don't see how the previous person who denied me my unblock request made it an ethnic issue we are neither black or white.Either way I am very sorry for my language and will not use words like "Dirty" again while referring to others.I will follow all the wiki rules from now on.[[User:Dhruvekhera|Dhruvekhera]] ([[User talk:Dhruvekhera#top|talk]]) 21:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologized twice "but I do apologize for my language used towards [[User:Sikh-history]] in those two words" and then I said "Again I apologize for my wrongdoings and will adhere to the wiki rules from now on" I called him dirty because he was making the pages messy not because of his ethnic group and the word Jatt is from his user page so I referred to him as that.We are both Indian's from punjab same ethnic stock I don't see how the previous person who denied me my unblock request made it an ethnic issue we are neither black or white.Either way I am very sorry for my language and will not use words like "Dirty" again while referring to others.I will follow all the wiki rules from now on.[[User:Dhruvekhera|Dhruvekhera]] ([[User talk:Dhruvekhera#top|talk]]) 21:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}