Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Thread comment, no reply
→‎Goldgenie: Remove copy of proposed article (not appropriate for my talk page), {{unsigned}}
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 94: Line 94:


[[User:Korien63|Korien63]] ([[User talk:Korien63|talk]]) 17:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Korien63|Korien63]] ([[User talk:Korien63|talk]]) 17:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

== Goldgenie ==

Hi there,

I am writing an article on Goldgenie (a UK-based company). I noticed that it had been deleted previously for G11. I propose submitting the following. Could you have a look and let me know whether this passes G11. I have been 100 per cent objective. {{unsigned|Tompey}}

Revision as of 01:12, 8 February 2011

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

Deletion of Short Bus TV

Why was Short Bus TV's entry deleted? I guess the largest independent performing arts philanthropic endeavor in North Carolina isn't notable in any form? AmericasComedy.com wrote an article about it, but I guess that doesn't count for anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.172.71.190 (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it did not establish why the show is notable enough for inclusion. There was no mention of any independent reviews of the show in the article when it was deleted, only self-references and press releases. You are welcome to create an account and then recreate the article with the necessary references. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Hennessy (with a comma)

Thanks for your prompt action deleting the implausible "Peter Hennessy," redirect. Actually I just popped in to say that but - while I'm here - gosh, doesn't your Talk page ever get you depressed? So many complaints and hardly anyone discussing spelling, flowers, the history and music of the Baroque trumpet (before 1721), peanut butter or whatever. I do hope you enjoy this branch of Wikipedia work: it certainly needs doing, and I'm very grateful for your dedication in doing it, but it certainly wouldn't suit me! Good luck, and thanks again; all good wishes DBaK (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the nice message. The detachment and the ice cream both sound like very good ideas! Cheers DBaK (talk) 07:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Ok so cold lake ice is complete can you give me a review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyson&Thunder (talkcontribs) 04:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

looks good

thanx for everything looks good any other any ideas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyson&Thunder (talkcontribs) 00:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of spam dubstep musicians

Hey Gogo! -just wondering if there's an additional protection in the works for this, or are you willing to see how things play out? Kaini (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, i can totally understand that. considering the rise and rise of popularity with regards to the genre, i unfortunately don't see the onslaught ending any time soon either :( Kaini (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

Your common reasons for deletion includes a mistake:

All articles about companies must notability guideline for organizations

perhaps, must MEET THE???

Anyway, thanks for deleting my article. I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azguard98 (talkcontribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning....me

Top of the day to you and thanks; ...and you won't believe it, I almost forgot I had an article about me once or twice. :)) Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Tapdancernewyorkcity

with regard to my additions to the tap dance page .. you said i need notoriety ? i'm a well respected member of the tap dancing community. feel free to visit my website at http://xanderweinman.com.

best,

xander weinman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapdancernewyorkcity (talkcontribs) 23:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Warren Lemmon article

I have been looking for more information on Warren Lemmon (born 1986) and was hoping that you could bring the article back up. I have a citation that should work: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/360_Paper.pdf

I am willing to do more research to bring the article more up to date.


Korien63 (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you copy and paste the information that was deleted so that I can work off of that?

Thank you.

Korien63 (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for all of your help.

Best,

Korien63 (talk) 17:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goldgenie

Hi there,

I am writing an article on Goldgenie (a UK-based company). I noticed that it had been deleted previously for G11. I propose submitting the following. Could you have a look and let me know whether this passes G11. I have been 100 per cent objective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tompey (talkcontribs)