User talk:Ged UK

REFF-Burn - Reducing Emission from Fossil Fuel Burning

Hi Ged UK,

Thank you for your moderation on the REFF-Burn - Reducing Emission from Fossil Fuel Burning. Apologize if it's not very well standardized for the website, as I'm very much new in here. If time permits, can you please inform me on how to sort the copyright materials and to get the article to Wikipedia.

Regards and have a nice day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishardana (talk • contribs) 02:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Rishardana (talk) 02:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. When you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, let me know where I can find it.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on here.

Please make sure yuo include my name (Ged_UK) in the correspondance so that the people who receive the email will know who to notify. Once the confirmation has been recieved, I can restore the article.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Additionally, I make no promise that the article won't be deleted under the notability guidelines, so I'd advise you to check through and make sure that you can add independent reliable 3rd party sources that explain why the topic is notable.

Hope this helps, if you've any further queries, feel free to ask. GedUK  12:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Request to bring back a page Rohan Shravan

Hi Ged UK,

I know you've deleted the following page with the reason A7. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rohan_Shravan&action=edit&redlink=1

Please reconsider now to bring back that page. That person is the CEO of the industry which is producing upcoming tablets. Refer, http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/notion-ink-adam/

Consider this as my humble request.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babu som (talk • contribs) 07:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The tablet, and possibly the company, might be notable, but there's not enough in that link to show that he is. Additionally, it read like a resume and existed solely to advertise him. If you can find more sources that talk about him in some depth, rather than just mentioning his name in passing like that crunchgear one, let me know and I'll have another look at it. GedUK  11:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

• News and notes: More research on newbie editors; Baidu plagiarism; bin Laden coverage; brief news

• In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news

• WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games

• Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back

• Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?

• Technology report: MediaWiki 1.16.5, 1.17b1; 1.18 branched; UploadWizard the default; Berlin Hackathon; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Request to protect House of Anubis

Hi, I was wondering if you could protect the House of Anubis article again because people constantly keep updating uncited information about season two on it and also on is episodes' list article. Thanks for your time! --Avatarfanx2 (talk) 01:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  07:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Thanks! --Avatarfanx2 (talk) 17:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppet 94.64.35.23

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Plouton2/Archive. Note particularly the contribs of the last 3 blocked IPs - spurious (and semi-coherent) accusations of vandalism on User TPs relating to Greek-related pov seem to be a defining characteristic of this sockmaster. RashersTierney (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I've lowered it to a semi. Not sure there's quite enough to block the IP on DUCK grounds, but a checkuser might be helpful. GedUK  12:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)