Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Peterborough (2nd nomination)

List of bus routes in Peterborough

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Peterborough
• Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Peterborough (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Peterborough (3rd nomination)

List of bus routes in Peterborough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a plane/bus/trainspotting article. The content of the table itself is largely unreferenced and is not encyclopaedic content - it belongs Wikitravel and/or Wikia, not here. Simple Bob ^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 16:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Plane?! Trainspotting?! What are you on about? References can be sorted out, just need some time.  Adam mugliston  Talk  17:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - Article is in a kind of middle phase where the references are still being collected and the formatting sorted. Rcsprinter (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. "IDONTLIKEIT" is not a valid reason for deletion. The list is in better state than when it was last at AfD, with more sources. Although it's not completely referenced yet this is not a reason for deletion. If it were unreferenceable then that would be a reason for deletion, but as it's partly referenced then this is clearly not the case - anything that can't be sourced can be removed per normal editing, not deletion of the entire list. Formatting can also be improved, but that's not a reason to delete anything. Thryduulf (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. It is most unlikely that significant coverage in reliable secondary sources will ever be found for this material. The article fails General Notability Guideline, Notability of Standalone Lists guideline, Wikipedia is not a Directory, Wikipedia Stand Alone List Guideline Wikipedia is not a Travel Guide and Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information. If this sort of material is kept it is always liable to become outdated and a source of misinformation if editors concerned lose interest. Even if we have legal indemnity against any unfortunate consequences of providing wrong data we have a moral responsibility to avoid doing so, not to mention the potential damage to WP's reputation. It is not just a case of not liking it as there are sound reasons for not keeping it.--Charles (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

As I previously mentioned on a different AfD, I update the lists at regular intervals.  Adam mugliston  Talk  20:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

• Not everything is about you. You might get run over by one of your precious buses next week.(I hope not though).--Charles (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)