Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rm, trolling not worth responding to
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 176: Line 176:


:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paulmcanders&diff=460725600&oldid=460404407 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 04:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paulmcanders&diff=460725600&oldid=460404407 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 04:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


Godo

The particular difference with this site is that is it has practice this type of pornography much longer that other sites in this type of [[Sexual fetishism|fetish]]. In the review :

http://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovethebeach/

"They affirm they are one of the oldest site of topless beach erotic, since 1997! And they are right - their collection of photos and videos, more than 10000 photos and more than 1000 video clips!"

This is why it stands out and the reason I am trying to get it noticed. This type of candid pornography invades people's privacy's who go to these beaches to not know that they are being filmed and posted for the whole world to see.

As for the newspaper articles you have to remember that many newspapers are there to sell and if something does not seem to attractive for them they will not publish it maybe that is why these guys have been out of so many years and nobody has heard from them.I will keep looking for articles but you have to see that so far theses reviews are the best I have to work with along the other sites I sent you.

As for the references in the other articles [[XVideos]] this page has only one refernce not from a newspaper article but from a statistics website just like the ones I sent to you so many times before and was never deleted. Maybe this proves that it does not have to be so rigid following the rules that do not ensure correct information or that not all the pages are well checked.

I will make the edits to the page you ask me to do. You do not want it to give only estatistcs but be an encyclopedic page. I will delete everything but the first page and rewrite it to fit your standards.

But I will just like to make sure if I sent it to the main page after making the changes will you try to defend the article making sure noone will delete it or will you like to delete it yourself?

[[User:Paulmcanders|Paulmcanders]] ([[User talk:Paulmcanders|talk]]) 03:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
== A barnstar for you! ==

Revision as of 03:05, 17 November 2011

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

Reinstatement of "Shane Cross" article

Hi Gogo Dodo

I was wondering if I could please have the article on the Australian skateboarder Shane Cross, reinstated? The original page was at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shane_Cross

I'm happy to do some research & provide citations and links to support the notability of him.

As an initial basis, I've found a state-based newspaper (The Age, Melbourne, Australia) article online, here at:

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/skaters-lost-without-cross/2007/03/08/1173166868943.html

I found his earlier page via the following listing at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sportspeople_who_died_during_their_careers

Best regards,

Jbro68 (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gogo dodo, will take your advice, much appreciated! Jbro68 (talk) 05:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor South Pacific

Your summaries are great. I hope you don't mind my "tweeking" them a bit. BTW, the article would be a mess without your diligence. Buster Seven Talk 14:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this OR?

Last night on Survivor, Jeff Probst said "the two people who have votes are immune and everyone else draws rocks" during TC when he was warning people about revote ties. This implies that Ozzy and Dawn would not be immune to the rocks (which thus reverts the rock odds to 50:50 Upolu:Savaii). This very much could be why Cochran defected, so I was wondering should this be put into the page?

A disclaimer though, the one time the purple rock actually came out, immunity meant no rock [1] Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give up my gun article.

Hi, I was still updating the page when you deleted what i wrote. the update was to fix an error and give proper credit to the originator of the slogan. My Father created the slogan in 1971 and is reconized by the NRA as the creator.

How can we change it back? or do I have to re-write it?

Thanks, Rob Lupo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert.lupo (talkcontribs) 17:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edit

Hi thanks for the message,its a great site with everything I could need to know and so much more my family and I can learn, Les ( UK ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Les coote (talkcontribs) 17:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hello Gogo Dodo,

You recently deleted my article "Carlos E. Norris". When I most certianly explained myself in the article. Considering that it was a small article with little information; it had nothing to do with my personal life or anyone elses, it was there stating that Chuck Norris's real name is Carlos E. Norris. I simply created a link to the wikipedia article about Chuck Norris for reference. Nothing more. Uncertianperson (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was redirected to the article on Chuck Norris. Uncertianperson (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that makes more sense. Thank you. I am slightly inexperienced. Thank you for showing me my mistake and I will try no to do it agian. I must also thank you for helping me learn more about how to edit with wikipedia. Uncertianperson (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, those jokes are pointless and should not be stated in Wikipedia unless needed for explanation. Uncertianperson (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of Misty Medley, a CSD A9 you closed in 2009

Just a heads-up, in case you've an interest.

The new article is Misty Medley. I've made a feedback request here, specifically addressing notability concerns.

message re: previous deletion:

  • 05:58, 20 October 2009 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Misty Medley" ‎ (A9: Non-notable music by artist with no Wikipedia article)

--Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weird inline advertising tags and User:Emptyexistence

I see you warned this person here User talk:Emptyexistence recently. It's still going on, e.g. here. Do you know what it means or if it should be reported somewhere? I don't think it's software, because this time it took two edits to put it in.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
got it, thanks. I watchlisted the village pump discussion.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 06:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ilovethebeach.com

Godo Dodo I have finished the article please tell me if it fits wikipedia's requirments so I may be able to move it the main page.Thank you.Paulmcanders (talk) 17:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Godo Dodo

I will like to say at first thank you for all you help so far. i am suffering from a major problem now because this project was not supposed to take so long and I have tried to look for articles from important newspapers and magazines but I could not find any. I typed in at google news and nothing came up as for the Victoria Beckham i have the video here but no website or jornalistic organization have made comments on the subject. The reason I wanted to start this article was to try and get some reconsition because it has been invaded peolpe's privacy for over a decade now. It looks like some people really do not care about this subject. When it comes to pages like Youporn and Redtube there are very little refences to be seen and Xhamster and Xvideos which are a poplular websites just like them do not have a pages on wikipedia. I am now asking for your help. I do not want to give up on this. If you really need a famous newspaper to write a story about this? Do you have enough influence as an administrator on wikipedia to make this happen? Or if you like we can make the necessary changes together with the material we have at hand.

What should I do?

From Paulmcanders (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Does this site count as a reference?

http://www.sitetrail.com/ilovethebeach.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmcanders (talkcontribs) 07:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Godo Dodo

I have already sent my request on Wikipedia:Requests for feedback and I am hoping to get a result soon also I found these new links please tell me if they fit the criteria your looking for.

http://contaya.com/merchants/summary/22992/articles/1/all

http://www.porninspector.com/reviews/review/i-love-the-beach/

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a7b_1225270715

From PaulMCANDERS

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ok Godo do I have permission then to move it to the main page? Also there has still not been a single feedback towards the Wikipedia:Requests for feedback so this may be as good as it gets. Have you ever seen that movie? As Good as It Gets.

From User:PaulMcAnders

P.S. How do I replie so I do not have to go directly to your talk page to leave you a message?

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok I have a a reliable source from this proninspector site what other changes do you think I should make for it to have less chances of being deleted then. What other edits?

Alos I am an administrator of a wikia do you know how I can close down the whole site? User: PaulMcAnder

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:43, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will edit the page then send it to you but I have seen the other site and voyer web has come by with only two site references so maybe if I look harder maybe I can find another reference but if not I would like to know how many administrator are there on wikipedia and which ones do you think might delete my page besides you being the fisrt one?

Paulmcanders (talk) 02:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Godo here are new links I found to give the page more reliability :

http://www.rabbitsreviews.com/s5197/I-Love-The-Beach.html

http://www.thebestporn.com/review/ilovethebeach/

http://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovethebeach/

http://www.talkreviews.com/ilovethebeach.com

http://www.deviantclip.com/sponsor/i-love-the-beach-hvh?sort=editorchoice

http://reviews.freeones.com/I_Love_The_Beach.shtml

See what you think of them and then i will send you the edited version of the page.

Paulmcanders (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Godo

The particular difference with this site is that is it has practice this type of pornography much longer that other sites in this type of fetish. In the review :

http://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovethebeach/

"They affirm they are one of the oldest site of topless beach erotic, since 1997! And they are right - their collection of photos and videos, more than 10000 photos and more than 1000 video clips!"

This is why it stands out and the reason I am trying to get it noticed. This type of candid pornography invades people's privacy's who go to these beaches to not know that they are being filmed and posted for the whole world to see.

As for the newspaper articles you have to remember that many newspapers are there to sell and if something does not seem to attractive for them they will not publish it maybe that is why these guys have been out of so many years and nobody has heard from them.I will keep looking for articles but you have to see that so far theses reviews are the best I have to work with along the other sites I sent you.

As for the references in the other articles XVideos this page has only one refernce not from a newspaper article but from a statistics website just like the ones I sent to you so many times before and was never deleted. Maybe this proves that it does not have to be so rigid following the rules that do not ensure correct information or that not all the pages are well checked.

I will make the edits to the page you ask me to do. You do not want it to give only estatistcs but be an encyclopedic page. I will delete everything but the first page and rewrite it to fit your standards.

But I will just like to make sure if I sent it to the main page after making the changes will you try to defend the article making sure noone will delete it or will you like to delete it yourself?

Paulmcanders (talk) 03:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I just hit up WP:RFPP and noticed you already semi'd and blocked. Outstanding work, my good sir. Stay classy. Ishdarian 04:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the barnstar. It is an honor to receive one from you. I spoiled the little 4chan attack. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry for creating this account but everything seemed fine? Puffin Let's talk! 17:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I properly cite this so IPs or users don't revert

[2] I think we will agree, whatever Jeff Probst says is considered a WP:RS just like any promotional material that CBS can put out (remember a couple seasons ago when CBS leaked the exact configuration of the tribal swap in a preview). Anyways to my point, Probst confirmed on his Tout page (it is like a video version of twitter) that this week is a double elimination also. For that reason, I put this information onto the page, I cited his Tout and I put notes < ! - - - (without the spaces) notes in pointing that out. Is this sufficient? Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tout seems pretty cool, the only problem is that when the show is on I am often juggling updating the article, eating dinner, and watching the episode (and sometimes I try to get school work done at the same time). Trying to tweet Probst and watch his Tout updates at the same time seems like way too much multitasking. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my name is Ethan and I was wondering if you can undelete my article because it contained true facts it had a link to prove so it was neutral to all audiences and it was a well written article, so if you could undelete it for me that would be great — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.65.63 (talk) 04:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because you did not establish why your group is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the guidelines for organizations or web content. You may recreate the article if you can establish your notability per one of those guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Goot article: deleted?

Hej, it's LHefferman, I've been a supporter of Alex Goot for a long time, and, while checking through various Fan Sites, people wondered why his article was removed. I, also, while explaining him online, have tried to reference his article, and failed. It is referenced in numerous other articles, and he does fit most of the Notability Guidelines. Therefore, instead of me attempting to rebuild his article, I am asking you to reinstate it for the betterment of many supporters, as well as others connected with YouTube artists, like Sam Tsui, who still has a Wikipedia page, or Christina Grimmie, who, although still unsigned, has a page. Thank you, and please consider re-adding this page! LHefferman - NerdWithTheHat (talk) 20:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about userspace pages, and I'd very much appreciate it if you could transfer that page there. Thank you again! LHefferman - NerdWithTheHat (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]