Jump to content

Kyndra Rotunda: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fixing page range dashes using AWB (7861)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 116: Line 116:
</ref> About the book, he wrote, "For readers hoping for an even-handed assessment, the initial appearance is not promising." Fisher quotes Shepard's statement that the U.S. erred in "imposing rules that made it difficult for prosecutors to respond to defense counsel claims...", and states that "The book never explains what constraints existed...". Of Rotunda's statement that the U.S. erred by "giving detainees more rights than the Geneva Conventions require", Fisher states "They needed them. Unlike prisoners of war, who are released after a war and do not face trial, the detainees were subject to prosecution and possibly the death sentence".<ref name=Fisher/>
</ref> About the book, he wrote, "For readers hoping for an even-handed assessment, the initial appearance is not promising." Fisher quotes Shepard's statement that the U.S. erred in "imposing rules that made it difficult for prosecutors to respond to defense counsel claims...", and states that "The book never explains what constraints existed...". Of Rotunda's statement that the U.S. erred by "giving detainees more rights than the Geneva Conventions require", Fisher states "They needed them. Unlike prisoners of war, who are released after a war and do not face trial, the detainees were subject to prosecution and possibly the death sentence".<ref name=Fisher/>


''[[Toronto Star]]'' reporter [[Michelle Shephard]], author of ''[[Guantanamo's Child: The Untold Story of Omar Khadr]]'', in a review of five other books on Guantanamo, described ''Honor Bound'' as: "...a poorly written personal account of an Army JAG that glosses over critical events in Guantanamo's history with offhand dismissals." Shephard continued, "There is some interesting legal stuff to ponder – such as how and why has the U.S. administration exceeded or sidestepped the protections of the international Geneva Conventions ...".<ref name=TorStar2008-11-23>{{cite news
''[[Toronto Star]]'' reporter [[Michelle Shephard]], author of ''[[Guantanamo's Child: The Untold Story of Omar Khadr]]'' when promoting her own book, , criticized others, incluging Rotunda's ''Honor Bound'' which she called "...a poorly written personal account of an Army JAG that glosses over critical events in Guantanamo's history with offhand dismissals." Shephard continued, "There is some interesting legal stuff to ponder – such as how and why has the U.S. administration exceeded or sidestepped the protections of the international Geneva Conventions ...". She offered no specific examples. <ref name=TorStar2008-11-23>{{cite news
| url=http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/books/article/541216
| url=http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/books/article/541216
| title=Guantanamo: A place that will live in infamy
| title=Guantanamo: A place that will live in infamy
Line 128: Line 128:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Rotunda's publishers found favorable reactions from recognized legal experts. Former United States [[Solicitor General of the United States|Solicitor General]] [[Theodore B. Olson]] endorsed the book, saying "No American should miss the opportunity -- and responsibility -- to read it. Bravo!"<ref name=CarolinaAcademicPressRotundaPositiveReviews/>
Honor Bound has received favorable reactions from recognized legal experts, including former Attorney General Meese, New York Times Bestselling author James Swanson and Harvard Law Professir Alan Dershowitz. Former United States [[Solicitor General of the United States|Solicitor General]] [[Theodore B. Olson]] endorsed the book, saying "No American should miss the opportunity -- and responsibility -- to read it. Bravo!"<ref name=CarolinaAcademicPressRotundaPositiveReviews/>


[[Harvard Law]] professor [[Alan Dershowitz]] called the book an "eye-opening inside account [that] must be read by everyone who cares about balancing national security and human dignity."<ref name=CarolinaAcademicPressRotundaPositiveReviews>
[[Harvard Law]] professor [[Alan Dershowitz]] called the book an "eye-opening inside account [that] must be read by everyone who cares about balancing national security and human dignity."<ref name=CarolinaAcademicPressRotundaPositiveReviews>
Line 154: Line 154:
==Comments on the Supreme Court's Boumedienne ruling==
==Comments on the Supreme Court's Boumedienne ruling==


In June 2008 the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] overturned portions of the [[Detainee Treatment Act of 2005]] and the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]] which had attempted to strip access to [[habeas corpus]] from captives held at Guantanamo.<ref name=NationalReview2008-06-22>
In June 2008 the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] overturned portions of the [[Detainee Treatment Act of 2005]] and the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]]. <ref name=NationalReview2008-06-22>
{{cite news
{{cite news
| url = http://tank.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGEzYWNhZWM0NTA3ZjIzZGRlZGUyNjBmODkyMWZjYTA
| url = http://tank.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGEzYWNhZWM0NTA3ZjIzZGRlZGUyNjBmODkyMWZjYTA
Line 197: Line 197:
[http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sandiego.edu%2Flaw%2Fnews%2Fcalendar_of_events%2Fevent_archives%2F2008%2F2008_1111_Guantanamo.php&date=2011-10-28 mirror]
[http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sandiego.edu%2Flaw%2Fnews%2Fcalendar_of_events%2Fevent_archives%2F2008%2F2008_1111_Guantanamo.php&date=2011-10-28 mirror]
</ref>
</ref>
In her testimony Rotunda cited incidents where U.S. prison guards were attacked by detainees and where U.S. officials, contrary to U.S. and International Law, made some areas "off limits" to U.S. guards maintaining detemtion camps. She discussed one incident in Camp Bucca, Iraq, which led detainees to attack from the inside out and resulted in a bloody four day stand off. Rotunda supported religious freedoms for detainees, but opined making prison areas and detainee personal items "off limits" to searches by U.S. prison guards has led to violence and has put guards at risk.
In her testimony Rotunda asserted that the protection of the Guantanamo captives' religious freedoms put the guards at risk.
{{quotation|''"According to one military police officer who served in Guantanamo Bay, detainees brandish their home-made shanks to threaten U.S. troops, and then quickly shove them back into the Qu'ran, where they know are "off limits" to guards. Even in this situation, the guard may not touch the Qu'ran to confiscate the weapon."''}}
{{quotation|''"According to one military police officer who served in Guantanamo Bay, detainees brandish their home-made shanks to threaten U.S. troops, and then quickly shove them back into the Qu'ran, where they know are "off limits" to guards. Even in this situation, the guard may not touch the Qu'ran to confiscate the weapon."''}}



Revision as of 07:45, 16 December 2011

Kyndra Rotunda
Bornc. 1974 (age 49–50)
NationalityUnited States
Alma materUniversity of Wyoming (B.A. '96)
UW College of Law (J.D. '99)
Occupation(s)law professor, lawyer, US Army officer, author
SpouseRonald D. Rotunda
Websitewww.kyndrarotunda.com

Kyndra Kaye Rotunda[1] (née Miller, born c. 1974) is an American lawyer, author, and officer in the U.S. Army JAG Corps Individual Ready Reserve.[2] She is a law professor at the Chapman University School of Law.[3]

Education

She attended the University of Wyoming from 1992 to 1999, receiving a B.A. (1996) in history and a J.D. (1999) from the University of Wyoming College of Law.[4][5]

Career

From 2000 through 2003, Rotunda served as an officer in the US Army JAG Corps and she is currently a Major in the Army Individual Ready Reserve.[5] She is notable for her military service related to Guantanamo Bay, first as a Legal Advisor to the Guantanamo Detention Camp Commander, later as a legal advisor to the Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Task Force, then as a Prosecutor for the Guantanamo Military Commissions. In 2008, she published a book about her experience, titled Honor Bound: Inside the Guantanamo Trials.[6]

From 2003 to 2005, she was the Wyoming State Planning Coordinator and served as an advisor to then-Governor Dave Freudenthal.[5]

In 2006, she became a law professor at the George Mason University School of Law, where she was the Director of a pro bono law clinic for military personnel and veterans.[7]

In 2008, Rotunda and her husband Ronald Rotunda joined a list of former faculty of George Mason University who took positions at the Chapman University School of Law. She developed and heads the Chapman pro bono law clinic for military personnel and veterans. She was recently named as a Lecturer at University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall), to assist in starting a similar clinic there.[8]

Professor Rotunda advocates for military troops. Her op-eds have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the Christian Science Monitor, The New York Sun, The Chicago Tribune, The Washington Times, The Orange County Register, and others. She has appeared on national and international television news programs including Al Jazeera, Hannity's America, and The Brit Hume Report.[4]

In September, 2008, Professor Rotunda testified before Congress about restoring the rule of law in Guantanamo Bay and various legal issues impacting the troops.[9]

Honor Bound

Specialist in Constitutional Law at the Library of Congress Louis Fisher wrote that as a JAG officer, Rotunda had "a good opportunity to understand the military commissions underway at “Gitmo” and correct misconceptions about the procedures."[10] About the book, he wrote, "For readers hoping for an even-handed assessment, the initial appearance is not promising." Fisher quotes Shepard's statement that the U.S. erred in "imposing rules that made it difficult for prosecutors to respond to defense counsel claims...", and states that "The book never explains what constraints existed...". Of Rotunda's statement that the U.S. erred by "giving detainees more rights than the Geneva Conventions require", Fisher states "They needed them. Unlike prisoners of war, who are released after a war and do not face trial, the detainees were subject to prosecution and possibly the death sentence".[10]

Toronto Star reporter Michelle Shephard, author of Guantanamo's Child: The Untold Story of Omar Khadr when promoting her own book, , criticized others, incluging Rotunda's Honor Bound which she called "...a poorly written personal account of an Army JAG that glosses over critical events in Guantanamo's history with offhand dismissals." Shephard continued, "There is some interesting legal stuff to ponder – such as how and why has the U.S. administration exceeded or sidestepped the protections of the international Geneva Conventions ...". She offered no specific examples. [11]

Honor Bound has received favorable reactions from recognized legal experts, including former Attorney General Meese, New York Times Bestselling author James Swanson and Harvard Law Professir Alan Dershowitz. Former United States Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson endorsed the book, saying "No American should miss the opportunity -- and responsibility -- to read it. Bravo!"[12]

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz called the book an "eye-opening inside account [that] must be read by everyone who cares about balancing national security and human dignity."[12] Dershowitz maintains that the law regarding torture should permit it in the "ticking time bomb" scenario, but Rotunda rejects that view. She opposes torture and called Dershowitz's "ticking time bomb" hypothetical, and "inherently imperfect because it assumes what we cannot know."[13]

Comments on the Supreme Court's Boumedienne ruling

In June 2008 the Supreme Court overturned portions of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 and the Military Commissions Act of 2006. [14] Rotunda responded with an op-ed in the Chicago Tribune entitled "Supreme Court Ruling Puts Soldiers at Great Risk", that was highly critical of the Supreme Court's ruling. In the years since the ruling Rotunda has appeared on academic panels and published papers criticizing the decision.[15]

In the National Review, Peter Pham stated that Rotunda had more years of military service than all the nine Supreme Court Justices put together.[14] According to Pham, Rotunda's position was that:

"... military commanders must justify battlefield captures and prove to a U.S. judge that decisions they made on the ground—in a faraway land during a battle—were justified ... [the decision] puts American troops at risk and will lead to more U.S. deaths on the battlefield because it makes it more difficult for soldiers to detain the enemy."[14]

2008 Testimony before a Senate Judicial subcommittee

In September 2008 Rotunda testified before a subcommittee of the United States Senate's Judicial Committee.[16] In her testimony Rotunda cited incidents where U.S. prison guards were attacked by detainees and where U.S. officials, contrary to U.S. and International Law, made some areas "off limits" to U.S. guards maintaining detemtion camps. She discussed one incident in Camp Bucca, Iraq, which led detainees to attack from the inside out and resulted in a bloody four day stand off. Rotunda supported religious freedoms for detainees, but opined making prison areas and detainee personal items "off limits" to searches by U.S. prison guards has led to violence and has put guards at risk.

"According to one military police officer who served in Guantanamo Bay, detainees brandish their home-made shanks to threaten U.S. troops, and then quickly shove them back into the Qu'ran, where they know are "off limits" to guards. Even in this situation, the guard may not touch the Qu'ran to confiscate the weapon."

2011 headscarf controversy

In March 2011 Rotunda weighed in on a controversy over whether their superiors should have encouraged female GIs in Afghanistan and Iraq to wear head-scarves to conform to local ideas of females dress,[17] stating that anyone familiar with military culture understood this suggestion was tantamount to an order, which inappropriately put female GIs at risk.

On April 8, 2011, in a Chicago Tribune op-ed about those risks, Rotunda triggered controversy.[18] Rotunda asserted that wearing headscarves prevented the wearing of helmets, and that the recommendation was inconsistent with an earlier policy that prohibited jewish GIs from wearing the yarmulke. Military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Michael Lawhorn disputed Rotunda's safety claims, stating that female GIs were not being encouraged to wear headscarves instead of their helmets, that their helmet could be worn over top of a headscarf.

According to Rotunda, the objections from Lieutenant Colonel Martha McSally, a female fighter pilot stationed in Saudi Arabia, had influenced Congress to pass an "anti-abaya law".[18] But Rotunda said the 2003 law was specific to female GIs stationed in Saudi Arabia, and had expired.

References

  1. ^ "Kyndra Kaye Rotunda" (profile). Justia.com.[dubiousdiscuss]
  2. ^ "Author Information: Kyndra Rotunda". cap-press.com. Carolina Academic Press. Archived from the original on November 23, 2008. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
  3. ^ "Kyndra Rotunda, Esquire and Author: News and Events". self published. Archived from the original on November 23, 2008.
  4. ^ a b "Kyndra Rotunda bio". Chapman University School of Law. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  5. ^ a b c "Kyndra Rotunda (Miller) profile". LinkedIn. Retrieved April 25, 2011. [dubiousdiscuss]
  6. ^ Rotunda, Kyndra Miller (2008). Honor Bound: Inside the Guantanamo Trials. Carolina Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-59460-512-3. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  7. ^ Vieth, Peter (June 2, 2008). "Rotundas to leave GMU for California law school: Pair are latest to join faculty for Chapman". Virginia Lawyers Weekly. Archived from the original on November 23, 2008. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  8. ^ Jolly, Vik (October 27, 2008). "Pendleton Marines could get more access to legal help at Chapman University". Orange County Register. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  9. ^ "Restoring the Rule of Law: U.S. Senate Hearing transcript". United States Senate. September 16, 2008. Retrieved April 1, 2009.
  10. ^ a b Fisher, Louis (September 2008). "Honor Bound: Inside the Guantanamo Trials review". Law & Politics Book Review. American Political Science Association. pp. 830–833. mirror
  11. ^ Shephard, Michelle (November 23, 2008). "Guantanamo: A place that will live in infamy". thestar.com. Toronto Star. Archived from the original on November 23, 2008. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
  12. ^ a b "Promotional material appearing on Honor Bound book jacket". cap-press.com. Carolina Academic Press. 2008. Retrieved December 24, 2008.
  13. ^ Rotunda, Kyndra Miller (June 2008). Honor Bound: Inside the Guantanamo Trials. Carolina Academic Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-1-59460-512-3. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  14. ^ a b c J. Peter Pham (2008-06-22). "JAG: "Supreme Court Ruling Puts Soldiers at Great Risk"". National Review. Retrieved 2011-10-28. ...Kyndra Rotunda, a former legal advisor at Guantanamo and prosecutor with the Office of Military Commissions, argues that because of the latest Supreme Court ruling on the terrorist detainees, "military commanders must justify battlefield captures and prove to a U.S. judge that decisions they made on the ground—in a faraway land during a battle—were justified" and thus the decision "puts American troops at risk and will lead to more U.S. deaths on the battlefield because it makes it more difficult for soldiers to detain the enemy." mirror
  15. ^ "What Happens Now? Guantanamo Bay After Boumediene and Hamdan". University of San Diego. 2008-11-13. Retrieved 2011-10-28. mirror
  16. ^ Kyndra Rotunda (2008-09-16). "Testimony of Kyndra Rotunda". United States Senate. Retrieved 2011-10-28. mirror
  17. ^ Caroline May (2011-03-31). "Don't forget your hijab, soldier! American servicewomen encouraged to wear headscarves in Afghanistan". Fox News. Retrieved 2011-10-28. Major Kyndra Rotunda, executive director of the Military Law and Policy Institute and AMVETS Legal Clinic, told The Daily Caller that while the women are not being ordered to wear the head scarf, encouragement is tantamount to a demand. mirror
  18. ^ a b Kyndra Miller Rotunda (2011-04-11). "Stop encouraging deployed female soldiers to wear headscarves". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2011-10-28. The U.S. military is "encouraging" female soldiers deployed to Afghanistan to wear Muslim headscarves — even when on patrol. Not only is it dangerous to patrol without a helmet, it imposes a religion on our troops and violates the uniform policy. mirror

Template:Persondata