Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghazala Gardens hotel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:37, 24 July 2005

Ghazala Gardens hotel

Unless they have played a significant role in human affairs, hotels are not inherently notable. Denni ☯ 02:37, 2005 July 23 (UTC)

Keep this hotel was a target of a major terrorist attack recently [1]. --malathion ^talk 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 02:49, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
- After reading the below, I think would like to think a redirect makes more sense now. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 20:41, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
~~Delete~~ Redirect, unless a significant amount of information about the hotel itself appears in the article before this VfD expires. Yes, it was the target of a terrorist attack, but so far, every notable piece of information about the hotel is already covered in that article. (Changed vote as per Ливай. 08:11, July 23, 2005 (UTC)) —HorsePunchKid→龜 02:52, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. --Tony Hecht 03:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The hotel itself is not notable, only the events that took place. This should be covered under the article specific to the event as per HorsePunchKid.Hamster Sandwich 03:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks. Later on, if somebody can write something encyclopedic about it not pertaining to those attacks, they can replace the redirect with something else, but for now there's nothing here that would not fit in better at July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks with its proper context. — Ливай | Ⓣ 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn hotel. JamesBurns 05:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Livajo's recommendation.--DNicholls 07:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as stated above. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 07:52, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect. GhePeU 08:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand Seems a major establishment. Possibly notable. We've had worse beginning stubs before. Circeus 11:21, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. The TWA Flight 800 and United Flight 93 articles started out as little more than stubs when they were first drafted. WP will add to it as more news develops from the recent attacks. LokiCT 12:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. per malathion--Edcolins 12:29, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect, as above. -R. fiend 15:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The hotel may have future history which will not be covered in the terrorism article. Calsicol 16:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is jest a stub this page mite get beter My Cat inn 19:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *<s>'''Keep''' and expand. [[User:Sasquatch|Sasquatch{{unicode|&#08242;}}]]{{unicode|&#08596;}}[[User_talk:Sasquatch|T]]{{unicode|&#08596;}}[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|C]] 02:49, July 23, 2005 (UTC)</s>
 **After reading the below, I think would like to think a '''redirect''' makes more sense now. [[User:Sasquatch|Sasquatch{{unicode|&#08242;}}]]{{unicode|&#08596;}}[[User_talk:Sasquatch|T]]{{unicode|&#08596;}}[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|C]] 20:41, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
-* <s>'''Delete'''</s> '''Redirect''', unless a significant amount of information about the hotel itself appears in the article before this VfD expires. Yes, it was the target of a terrorist attack, but ''so far'', every notable piece of information about the hotel is already covered in [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks|that article]]. ''(Changed vote as per [[User:Livajo|?????]]. 08:11, July 23, 2005 (UTC))'' &mdash;[[User:HorsePunchKid|<span style="font-family: monospace; font-variant: small-caps;">HorsePunchKid</span>]]&rarr;[[User talk:HorsePunchKid|<span style="color: #070;">&#x9F9C;</span>]] 02:52, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
+* <s>'''Delete'''</s> '''Redirect''', unless a significant amount of information about the hotel itself appears in the article before this VfD expires. Yes, it was the target of a terrorist attack, but ''so far'', every notable piece of information about the hotel is already covered in [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks|that article]]. ''(Changed vote as per [[User:Livajo|Ливай]]. 08:11, July 23, 2005 (UTC))'' &mdash;[[User:HorsePunchKid|<span style="font-family: monospace; font-variant: small-caps;">HorsePunchKid</span>]]&rarr;[[User talk:HorsePunchKid|<span style="color: #070;">&#x9F9C;</span>]] 02:52, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' and expand. --[[User:Tony619|Tony Hecht]] 03:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' The hotel itself is not notable, only the events that took place. This should be covered under the article specific to the event as per HorsePunchKid.[[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] 03:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Redirect''' to [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks]]. Later on, if somebody can write something encyclopedic about it not pertaining to those attacks, they can replace the redirect with something else, but for now there's nothing here that would not fit in better at [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks]] with its proper context. — [[User:Livajo|?????]] | [[User talk:Livajo|?]] 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Redirect''' to [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks]]. Later on, if somebody can write something encyclopedic about it not pertaining to those attacks, they can replace the redirect with something else, but for now there's nothing here that would not fit in better at [[July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks]] with its proper context. — [[User:Livajo|Ливай]] | [[User talk:Livajo|Ⓣ]] 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' nn hotel. [[User:JamesBurns|JamesBurns]] 05:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Redirect''' per Livajo's recommendation.--[[User:DNicholls|DNicholls]] 07:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)