Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMCR 95.3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:29, 11 February 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Articles at Wikipedia are not deleted because they are abandoned. We wait for others to come by and pick up editing them again. Dcoetzee 11:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TMCR 95.3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original author is no longer part of the project, as noted in the Talk page of the main item. Rather than leave old information standing, with no author to maintain the entry, it was felt better to delete the entire thing. TrustAM (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm sorry, but our policies are quite clear. Even if an editor (with a conflict of interest as admitted here) leaves their workplace and was the majority editor, others have edited the article besides the original author (a long-departed IP), and under the terms of Creative Commons and the GFDL which makes all contributions property of the Project, this article should remain as station has not left air and is publicly licensed. Others can easily help maintain the article in the future. Nate • (chatter) 06:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Extremely poor reason for deletion. Page can and will be updated by other Wikipedians in the Doncaster area or even outside of it. Please, also read WP:OWN. Request: Since this user is an admitted former employee of this station, I request this AfD be ended early per WP:COI. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 10:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. Articles at Wikipedia are not deleted because they are abandoned. We wait for others to come by and pick up editing them again. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 11:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 ===[[TMCR 95.3]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
 :{{la|TMCR 95.3}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TMCR 95.3|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 11#{{anchorencode:TMCR 95.3}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Keep''' I'm sorry, but our policies are quite clear. Even if an editor (with a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] as admitted here) leaves their workplace and was the majority editor, others have edited the article besides the original author (a long-departed IP), and under the terms of Creative Commons and the GFDL which makes all contributions property of the Project, this article should remain as station has not left air and is publicly licensed. Others can easily help maintain the article in the future. <font face="Myriad Web">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:royalblue4">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:dark blue">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:darkgoldenrod">chatter</span>]])''</small></font> 06:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''': Extremely poor reason for deletion.  Page can and will be updated by other Wikipedians in the [[Doncaster]] area or even outside of it.  Please, also read [[WP:OWN]].  '''Request''': Since this user is an admitted former employee of this station, I request this AfD be ended early per [[WP:COI]]. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;">Talk</span>]] • 10:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)</small>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>