Jump to content

User talk:Moriori: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Talk page warnings: Very odd. Moriori's comment didn't appear on my screen. No idea how it was removed. Fixed. Sorry.
Something's up with my tablet. Last edit and I'll go away. Wasn't trying to legislate, only to comment with my vast experience.
Line 51: Line 51:
Hi there! Just a quick note re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dsills41&diff=prev&oldid=648978306 this edit]: users, even disruptive ones, are allowed to remove warnings from their talk page. Yes, it does require a brainy editor to check a disruptive user's edit history, but them's the breaks. A completely blank talk page (i.e., one that doesn't have a "Create new page here" notice) is a sign that there has been some talk page activity, and an experienced editor typically thinks to check. On the other hand, when a user blanks his talk page, it is considered proof that he has read the content, and thus that he knows not to be disruptive again. Anyhow, enough of my chatter. [[WP:TPG]] for more info. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! Just a quick note re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dsills41&diff=prev&oldid=648978306 this edit]: users, even disruptive ones, are allowed to remove warnings from their talk page. Yes, it does require a brainy editor to check a disruptive user's edit history, but them's the breaks. A completely blank talk page (i.e., one that doesn't have a "Create new page here" notice) is a sign that there has been some talk page activity, and an experienced editor typically thinks to check. On the other hand, when a user blanks his talk page, it is considered proof that he has read the content, and thus that he knows not to be disruptive again. Anyhow, enough of my chatter. [[WP:TPG]] for more info. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 19:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
:* I'm butting in here; this talk page is on my watch list (I don't remember why). Yes, {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} is correct, users can remove warnings from their talk page. However, other users can also reinstate those warnings, and should, if there is an obvious reason. Replacing warnings in this case was appropriate; this editor was blocked indefinitely [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dsills41&action=history 13 minutes later]. See [[WP:IAR]] and especially [[WP:COMMON]]. --[[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]) 21:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
:* I'm butting in here; this talk page is on my watch list (I don't remember why). Yes, {{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} is correct, users can remove warnings from their talk page. However, other users can also reinstate those warnings, and should, if there is an obvious reason. Replacing warnings in this case was appropriate; this editor was blocked indefinitely [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dsills41&action=history 13 minutes later]. See [[WP:IAR]] and especially [[WP:COMMON]]. --[[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]) 21:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
::*You got it in one Gaff. I reinstated the '''complete''' history so that in the event of further disruption an admin would have a complete record of goings on on his talk page, without having to search around. Geronimo. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 22:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
:::Respectfully disagree. This is likely to [[WP:DNFTT|fan the flames]] and cause the reverter to get in a 3RR situation, for which they could be sanctioned. Restoring talk page warnings is not exempted. A more prudent approach is to watch the editor and let our normal processes work their magic. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 22:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
:::Respectfully disagree. This is likely to [[WP:DNFTT|fan the flames]] and cause the reverter to get in a 3RR situation, for which they could be sanctioned. Restoring talk page warnings is not exempted. A more prudent approach is to watch the editor and let our normal processes work their magic. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 22:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
::*You got it in one Gaff. I reinstated the '''complete''' history so that in the event of further disruption an admin would have a complete record of goings on on his talk page, without having to search around. Geronimo. [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 22:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)::::{{u|Cyphoidbomb}} Huh? I guess you are replying to Gaff. But [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moriori&diff=next&oldid=649001749 you removed my earlier reply] to his comment which I agreed with. Care to restore my comment and reformat the page? [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 23:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
::::{{u|Cyphoidbomb}} Huh? I guess you are replying to Gaff. But [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moriori&diff=next&oldid=649001749 you removed my earlier reply] to his comment which I agreed with. Care to restore my comment and reformat the page? [[User:Moriori|Moriori]] ([[User talk:Moriori#top|talk]]) 23:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:22, 26 February 2015

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to Archive 3. Sections without timestamps may be manually archived.