Talk:.380 ACP: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:09, 15 December 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .380 ACP article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 61 days

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WP1.0

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Firearms B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Change pic?

Suggest we change the pic from the Hi-Point to one of the actual cartridge. Anyone have one?

I removed the Yugoslavian 9mm short cartridge pic b/c there must be an issue in what they consider such versus what non-Former Warsaw Pact nations describe as such; the pics were 9x18mm Makarov rounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.124.242 (talk) 06:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love the Chart

yup. love it. those are details that i have not found on any other ammo page. if whoever created it did more i would love checkin them out. kudosPrimergrey (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.22 Fat? Never heard that as a name for .380 ACP, and there's no source.

Can anyone verify that as a name? Even in a Google search, the ONLY reference that came up was for the Wikipedia page for .380 ACP. This leads me to believe that this is an unverifiable- and therefore unofficial- name for .380 ACP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.153.241.154 (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US Bias

There is a very heavy US bias in the popular weapons section, mentioning concealed carry without mentioning the US is pretty poor form. I know it is linked to the concealed carry page but is the US the only place in the world with concealed carry? Also listing US specific weapon availability but no mention of other countries. C'mon editors this isn't US Wikipedia it's English language Wikipedia, end the bias.49.197.169.55 (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:00, 14 December 2014 edit 49.197.169.55 (talk) →‎US Bias: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:09, 15 December 2014 edit undo 139.218.177.138 (talk) →‎US Bias Next edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:
	== US Bias ==		== US Bias ==

	There is a very heavy US bias in the popular weapons section, mentioning concealed carry ~~links~~ without mentioning the US is pretty poor form. I know it is linked to the concealed carry page but is the US the only place in the world with concealed carry? Also listing US specific weapon availability but no mention of other countries. C'mon editors this isn't US Wikipedia it's English language Wikipedia, end the bias.[[Special:Contributions/49.197.169.55\|49.197.169.55]] ([[User talk:49.197.169.55\|talk]]) 20:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)		There is a very heavy US bias in the popular weapons section, mentioning concealed carry without mentioning the US is pretty poor form. I know it is linked to the concealed carry page but is the US the only place in the world with concealed carry? Also listing US specific weapon availability but no mention of other countries. C'mon editors this isn't US Wikipedia it's English language Wikipedia, end the bias.[[Special:Contributions/49.197.169.55\|49.197.169.55]] ([[User talk:49.197.169.55\|talk]]) 20:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)