User talk:Goodreg3

Nomination of Hey Dude (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hey Dude (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hey Dude (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Modussiccandi (talk) 21:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Scotland

added a link pointing to Free Church of Scotland

Stewarton

added a link pointing to Fenwick

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!

As I have noted in my own edit summaries, many of your edits would appear to be pointless foutering about, not helped by the fact that you rarely provide an edit summary to explain them. That's not to say that an edit summary would necessarily justify your change but at least it would give others a start in understanding your intended aim. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries (2)

What was the point of this unnecessarily aggressive edit summary? Fact is your previous edit was badly incorrect and you had to correct it rather than, as your edit summary misleadingly claims, you just ‘undid’ my revert. It’s perfectly reasonable to question whether 3 years is worth mentioning. Your response, with an inarticulate made up word (‘un-write’), isn’t an answer to the question I posed and is pretty lacking in WP:AGF. DeCausa (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Edinburgh

added a link pointing to Princess Street

Glasgow

added a link pointing to STV

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Stewarton Academy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stewarton Academy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, the only two sources are primary sources, and therefore do not go to notability. You need several sources which go in-depth about the school from independent sources to show it passes notability criteria. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Local Government and Communities Directorate moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Local Government and Communities Directorate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stewarton Academy has been accepted

Stewarton Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Ewen Cameron on The Late Show.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ewen Cameron on The Late Show.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 01:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rugby Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

File:East Ayrshire flag.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:East Ayrshire flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kindergarten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Care Inspectorate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 February 23 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Susan Boyle Rock Plaza.png
• File:Susan Boyle Commonwealth Games.png

Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 00:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hope (Susan Boyle album) into Susan Boyle. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)