Alina Chan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Filled in 10 bare reference(s) with reFill 2
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 16: Line 16:


Chan was one of 18 scientists who signed a letter in [[Science Magazine]] calling again for further investigation into the origins of the virus.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1|title=Investigate the origins of COVID-19|first1=Jesse D.|last1=Bloom|first2=Yujia Alina|last2=Chan|first3=Ralph S.|last3=Baric|first4=Pamela J.|last4=Bjorkman|first5=Sarah|last5=Cobey|first6=Benjamin E.|last6=Deverman|first7=David N.|last7=Fisman|first8=Ravindra|last8=Gupta|first9=Akiko|last9=Iwasaki|first10=Marc|last10=Lipsitch|first11=Ruslan|last11=Medzhitov|first12=Richard A.|last12=Neher|first13=Rasmus|last13=Nielsen|first14=Nick|last14=Patterson|first15=Tim|last15=Stearns|first16=Erik van|last16=Nimwegen|first17=Michael|last17=Worobey|first18=David A.|last18=Relman|date=May 14, 2021|journal=Science|volume=372|issue=6543|pages=694–694|via=science.sciencemag.org|doi=10.1126/science.abj0016|pmid=33986172}}</ref> The letter called for a "proper investigation" into the "viable hypothesis (of) laboratory spillover" and was widely covered in the press and brought the debate on the possible lab origins of the virus into the mainstream.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/could-a-lab-leak-really-be-to-blame-for-covid19/news-story/c0e9f8e4272b3f9845a2f6409d266db8|archiveurl=http://archive.today/20210618035659/https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/could-a-lab-leak-really-be-to-blame-for-covid19/news-story/c0e9f8e4272b3f9845a2f6409d266db8|deadurl=y|title=Could a lab leak really be to blame for Covid-19?|date=May 27, 2021|website=www.theaustralian.com.au}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://slate.com/technology/2021/05/covid-lab-leak-theory-opinions-everywhere.html|title=Just Because We’re Talking About the Lab Leak Theory Doesn’t Mean It’s Come True|first=Shannon|last=Palus|date=May 29, 2021|website=Slate Magazine}}</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/05/28/1001319014/many-scientists-still-think-the-coronavirus-came-from-nature</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/lab-leak-theory-science-scientists-rcna1191|title=The science around the lab leak theory hasn't changed. But here's why some scientists have.|website=NBC News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/559050-harvard-scientist-says-trump-hatred-motivated|title=Harvard scientist says Trump hatred motivated experts who denied Wuhan lab leak theory|first=Adam|last=Barnes|date=June 17, 2021|website=TheHill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/episodes/on-the-media-how-it-started-how-its-going|title=How It Started, How It's Going &#124; On the Media|website=WNYC Studios}}</ref>
Chan was one of 18 scientists who signed a letter in [[Science Magazine]] calling again for further investigation into the origins of the virus.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1|title=Investigate the origins of COVID-19|first1=Jesse D.|last1=Bloom|first2=Yujia Alina|last2=Chan|first3=Ralph S.|last3=Baric|first4=Pamela J.|last4=Bjorkman|first5=Sarah|last5=Cobey|first6=Benjamin E.|last6=Deverman|first7=David N.|last7=Fisman|first8=Ravindra|last8=Gupta|first9=Akiko|last9=Iwasaki|first10=Marc|last10=Lipsitch|first11=Ruslan|last11=Medzhitov|first12=Richard A.|last12=Neher|first13=Rasmus|last13=Nielsen|first14=Nick|last14=Patterson|first15=Tim|last15=Stearns|first16=Erik van|last16=Nimwegen|first17=Michael|last17=Worobey|first18=David A.|last18=Relman|date=May 14, 2021|journal=Science|volume=372|issue=6543|pages=694–694|via=science.sciencemag.org|doi=10.1126/science.abj0016|pmid=33986172}}</ref> The letter called for a "proper investigation" into the "viable hypothesis (of) laboratory spillover" and was widely covered in the press and brought the debate on the possible lab origins of the virus into the mainstream.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/could-a-lab-leak-really-be-to-blame-for-covid19/news-story/c0e9f8e4272b3f9845a2f6409d266db8|archiveurl=http://archive.today/20210618035659/https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/could-a-lab-leak-really-be-to-blame-for-covid19/news-story/c0e9f8e4272b3f9845a2f6409d266db8|deadurl=y|title=Could a lab leak really be to blame for Covid-19?|date=May 27, 2021|website=www.theaustralian.com.au}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://slate.com/technology/2021/05/covid-lab-leak-theory-opinions-everywhere.html|title=Just Because We’re Talking About the Lab Leak Theory Doesn’t Mean It’s Come True|first=Shannon|last=Palus|date=May 29, 2021|website=Slate Magazine}}</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/05/28/1001319014/many-scientists-still-think-the-coronavirus-came-from-nature</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/lab-leak-theory-science-scientists-rcna1191|title=The science around the lab leak theory hasn't changed. But here's why some scientists have.|website=NBC News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/559050-harvard-scientist-says-trump-hatred-motivated|title=Harvard scientist says Trump hatred motivated experts who denied Wuhan lab leak theory|first=Adam|last=Barnes|date=June 17, 2021|website=TheHill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/episodes/on-the-media-how-it-started-how-its-going|title=How It Started, How It's Going &#124; On the Media|website=WNYC Studios}}</ref>

== Publications ==
===Molecular Biology===
{{expand section}}
===COVID-19===
Chan and Matt Ridley are writing a book titled "VIRAL: THE SEARCH FOR THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19", to be published by HarperCollins in November 2021.<ref>http://www.georginacapel.com/alina-chan-and-matt-ridley-to-publish-book-about-the-origins-of-covid-19/</ref><ref>https://www.harpercollins.com/blogs/authors/alina-chan</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 13:24, 19 June 2021

Yujia Alina Chan (DoB unknown) is a Canadian molecular biologist specializing in gene therapy and cell engineering at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, where she is a Postdoctoral Fellow.

Education

Chan graduated from The University of British Columbia with B.Sc. and Ph.D in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in 2009 and 2014, respectively.

Career and research

Molecular biology

COVID-19

Chan became known during the COVID-19 pandemic for suggesting the possible lab origins of the virus in a preprint that failed to pass peer review, as reported by Rowan Jacobsen for the Boston Magazine[1] Chan become increasingly known when her work was covered in an article written by Nicholson Baker in New York Magazine, sparking a public debate on the origins of the virus.[2] Chan coauthored an OpEds on the subject with Matt Ridley the Wall Street Journal[3] and The Daily Telegraph[4]. Chan later signed open letters together with other scientists published in the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times on the possible lab origins of the virus, calling for full and unrestricted international forensic investigations into all possible origins of the virus.[5][6]

Chan was one of 18 scientists who signed a letter in Science Magazine calling again for further investigation into the origins of the virus.[7] The letter called for a "proper investigation" into the "viable hypothesis (of) laboratory spillover" and was widely covered in the press and brought the debate on the possible lab origins of the virus into the mainstream.[8][9][10][11][12][13]

Publications

Molecular Biology

COVID-19

Chan and Matt Ridley are writing a book titled "VIRAL: THE SEARCH FOR THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19", to be published by HarperCollins in November 2021.[14][15]

References

  1. ^ "Could Coronavirus Have Escaped from a Lab? | bostonmagazine.com".
  2. ^ Baker, Nicholson (January 4, 2021). "The Lab-Leak Hypothesis". Intelligencer.
  3. ^ Ridley, Alina Chan and Matt (January 15, 2021). "The World Needs a Real Investigation Into the Origins of Covid-19" – via www.wsj.com.
  4. ^ Ridley, Matt; Chan, Alina (February 6, 2021). "Did the Covid-19 virus really escape from a Wuhan lab?" – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  5. ^ https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/COVID%20OPEN%20LETTER%20FINAL%20030421%20(1).pdf
  6. ^ https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/virus-inquiries-pandemic-origins/d7a097a4c758a65a/full.pdf
  7. ^ Bloom, Jesse D.; Chan, Yujia Alina; Baric, Ralph S.; Bjorkman, Pamela J.; Cobey, Sarah; Deverman, Benjamin E.; Fisman, David N.; Gupta, Ravindra; Iwasaki, Akiko; Lipsitch, Marc; Medzhitov, Ruslan; Neher, Richard A.; Nielsen, Rasmus; Patterson, Nick; Stearns, Tim; Nimwegen, Erik van; Worobey, Michael; Relman, David A. (May 14, 2021). "Investigate the origins of COVID-19". Science. 372 (6543): 694–694. doi:10.1126/science.abj0016. PMID 33986172 – via science.sciencemag.org.
  8. ^ "Could a lab leak really be to blame for Covid-19?". www.theaustralian.com.au. May 27, 2021. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Palus, Shannon (May 29, 2021). "Just Because We're Talking About the Lab Leak Theory Doesn't Mean It's Come True". Slate Magazine.
  10. ^ https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/05/28/1001319014/many-scientists-still-think-the-coronavirus-came-from-nature
  11. ^ "The science around the lab leak theory hasn't changed. But here's why some scientists have". NBC News.
  12. ^ Barnes, Adam (June 17, 2021). "Harvard scientist says Trump hatred motivated experts who denied Wuhan lab leak theory". TheHill.
  13. ^ "How It Started, How It's Going | On the Media". WNYC Studios.
  14. ^ http://www.georginacapel.com/alina-chan-and-matt-ridley-to-publish-book-about-the-origins-of-covid-19/
  15. ^ https://www.harpercollins.com/blogs/authors/alina-chan

Category:Living people Category:Molecular biologists Category:Canadian scientists

See also