User talk:Prolancet

Welcome

Hello Prolancet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 18:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edits to Soy Protein

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 14:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I content dispute is not vandalism. I improved article by removing unreliable references and improved factual accurracy. --Prolancet 17:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

No you removed consensus content (a sourced Biological value table) without a valid explanation.[1]. That's vandalism. Yankees76 17:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I removed unreliable references. They are outdated. --Prolancet 17:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

We've already had this dicussion on the articles talk page. If you still feel you have something to add, go about it the right way - don't simply blank the material - or you willl be blocked like the rest of your sockpuppets. Yankees76 17:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not blank anything. I removed outdated material and replaced it with reliable material. The outdated references will be removed. --Prolancet 17:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Check the diffs, you blanked an entire table. "Outdated" is subjective,and you're editing based on your own POV. The "outdated" references you're removing are being used after a consensus was reached on the articles talk page. Removing them with a valid explanation is vandalism. Yankees76 18:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Removing them (outdated and dubious references) with a valid explanantion is good editing. --Prolancet 18:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Yankees76 18:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I have discussed my edits. I removed references that are outdated and replaced them with reliable references. --Prolancet 18:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)