User talk:TrangaBellam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:31, 20 February 2023

TrangaBellam is avoiding contemporary S. Asian politics (or similar minefields) for the next few months and choosing to work in quieter areas — mostly, modern history of Turkmenistan and Catalan number. She may not respond to talk page threads concerning any contentious topic. Thank you.

Archives

Talk,

2021, 2022,

list

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Pr.

Ruhnama - Low priority.
Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia - Low priority.
The Story of Civilization - High priority.
R. C. Majumdar - Medium priority.
Satish Chandra Mittal - Low priority.

To Read

THE EVOLUTION OF ANTLER AND BONE CHEEKPIECES FROM THE BALKAN-CARPATHIAN REGION TO CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN: CHRONOLOGY OF “CHARIOT” CULTURES AND MYCENAEAN GREECE
Politics, gender, and the Islamic past: The Legacy of ʻAʼisha bint Abi Bakr

The Kashmir Files

[[The Kashmir File#Review by Shubhra Gupta Please adhere to the topic where consensus was built. if you want to change, before changing again make sure to discuss. Dsnb07 (talk)

Reassess GA

TrangaBellam (talk) 07:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aryacakravarti dynasty

Gal Vihara

Portuguese conquest of the Jaffna Kingdom - Imp.

Munneswaram temple - Imp. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nezak Huns

The article Nezak Huns you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nezak Huns and Talk:Nezak Huns/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My GA nomination of Yoga and cultural appropriation

Hi TrangaBellam, time is flying past and I don't wish to hassle you – you are under no obligation. It's quite all right if you don't feel like doing this GAN review – your suggestion to use Andrea Jain was already very helpful, thank you. Just let me know if you'd like me to pop it back into the queue. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not get the point of time schedules in a GAR - it takes time to read a topic and make an informed review. For some examples, see Talk:Tuqaq/GA2, Talk:Ormon Khan/GA1, Talk:Battle of Vijithapura/GA2, Talk:Anuradhapura Kingdom/GA2 etc. Obviously, I understand that I am in a minority and most reviewers review everything from Cambrian geology to statistical functions to pop culture without caring to assess the NPOV nature of the content and acucracy. I took to reviewing the article, because I have my own interests in the area.

Anyway, if you feel constrained by my delays, please feel free to remove my name and throw the review open. If left to me, I will get to the review in this weekend. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for telling me your timescale, the weekend will be fine. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly request to WP:REFACTOR

First, thanks for creating a number of articles relevant to our recent discussions. Second, would you kindly revisit your talk page comments at Talk:Glaukopis and consider refactoring them for WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND? TIA. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:25, 20 February 2023 edit GizzyCatBella (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 17,604 edits →‎Friendly request to WP:REFACTOR: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:31, 20 February 2023 edit undo TrangaBellam (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 21,415 edits Restored revision 1140561723 by TrangaBellam (talk): Rv trolling Tags: Twinkle Undo Next edit →
Line 56:		Line 56:

	:No. [[User:TrangaBellam\|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam#top\|talk]]) 17:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)		:No. [[User:TrangaBellam\|TrangaBellam]] ([[User talk:TrangaBellam#top\|talk]]) 17:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
	::Please <u>'''refactor'''</u> [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGlaukopis&diff=prev&oldid=1140321569&diffmode=source this] or display the evidence of me stonewalling that conversation. Thank you. - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella\|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella\|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 17:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)