User talk:Hodja Nasreddin

Welcome!

Hello, Hodja Nasreddin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 00:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Vladimir Putin, Quotations

Hello, Biophys. I've removed one of your contribs and moved other (see history). But it's mostly technical, i.e. your work is appreciated. I've noticed some of your interest to Quotations -- let's work together to improve them. The thing is, the majority of the section was contributed once by me, and there was no one pro or contra voice. I would give B for the section, but not more. It still needs a large work of adding, removing, and refining. And, again, your work is valued. Remember one of basic principles of Wikipedia, be bold! Thank you. ellol 13:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

You might be interested...

I noticed your interests that you stated on your user page, and I just thought that you might be interested in the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject. If you like, drop by. I think that you may find it interesting. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 20:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• Welcome. :) – ClockworkSoul 07:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Non-postulated relativity

Hi Biophys, I don't have the impression that his approach is really original. You may see that as a negative remark, but for Wikipedia it can actually work out positive, as such an approach (which I would call "Lorentzian") that was shared by a number of notable, even "authoritive" physicists is certainly more notable (= encyclopedic) than that of one physicist who is unknown in the west.

Thus it may be worth writing a slightly more general article about it, if a respected journal article or book can be found that already discusses the subject (in order to avoid WP:OR). Possibly either "Lorentzian relativity" or "Physical relativity" could be sufficiently general as well as notable topics to which that book belongs. But probably you'd need help from other editors to make such a new article live up to its scope... Harald88 21:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Regards, Harald88 21:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

If it's simply a new way of teaching SR, then there are two ways it could be included in Wikipedia:

1. It was a notable minority viewpoint among teachers of SR.
2. Our editors thought the pedagogical approach would be useful for our readers, and found it not to have any major philisophical differences from ordinary SR teaching.

Is either of these things true? -- SCZenz 17:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I can answer for Biophys (Biophys where are you?).

Point 1: Yes, that is verified to be factual (Lorentz, Poincare, Langevin and several other teachers as well as a number of notable experimantal physicists such as Ives)

Point 2: Not clear what you mean. People such as Bell and of course the above Russian author, if I understand well, emphasized the pedagogical usefulness of the physical interpretation that we inherited from the stationary ether model, even if we don't explicitly use it.

Regards, Harald88 23:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

This month's winner is proteasome!

– ClockworkSoul 22:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Albumin

I was wondering if I might pick your brain? Yesterday you wrote in peripheral membrane protein that albumin can associate with lipid bilayers under certain experimental conditions in vitro. May I ask what conditions those might be, and what your source is? I ask because this behavior may be interfering with a set of experiments that I'm trying to perform. Many thanks! – ClockworkSoul 17:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! – ClockworkSoul 03:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Peripheral membrane protein

Did you notice that this article has been nominated for the MCB Collaboration of the Month? I see you've been putting alot of work into it, so you might want to add your vote to the stack: it's currently one of the front runners to be next month's collaboration. – ClockworkSoul 18:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Nikolay Khokhlov

Hi, Biophys: You left a note on the talk page of the defector Kokhlov and it is entirely possible that someone is pulling your chain. :::Parapsychology::: is the pseudo-science of the supernatural, especially ghosts and demons. Its possible that the U.S. government does study that sort of thing, but it isn't likely that a Soviet defector would be employed in such a potentially sensitive and embarrassing project. It is, however, quite likely that his wife and children may have spent time in gulag. V. Joe 15:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Russian history

Hi, i am historian, tell me more, what you specialize in, i love your edit on beria, i think we need to improve on some other bios too, can i send you suggestions? Nov 20

Yuri Shchekochikhin and Sergei Yushenkov

Hi, thank you for your hard work in developing Yuri Shchekochikhin and Sergei Yushenkov. If we can get them to a really good condition within five days, I am thinking of nominating one or both of these to appear on the Wikipedia front page in the "Did you know?" column of newest articles. [1] Let me know if you have any suggestions for a good "Did you know" phrase for the page. Best wishes, Dryman 21:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Biophys, thanks for your further edits. I have nominated the articles, I think they are in good shape and should have a good chance at being on the front page this week! If you think of any other important facts feel free to add them. It might also help to make a short stub article for Liberal Russia with anything you know about it. I have read that Yushenkov was assassinated just hours after registering Liberal Russia in the 2003 Duma elections [2], if this is true I think it's a very striking coincidence. Dryman 19:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

On November 29, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yuri Shchekochikhin, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On November 29, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sergei Yushenkov, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Well done Biophys. Top work, a double strike. Dryman was the kind nominator. Feel free to self-nominate, as the vast majority of entries are such. Thanks again, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Alexander Litvinenko

Okay. You want to take a look at it and cleanup and stuff? Maybe it will be more effective that way? I'm not too familiar with the whole apartment bombing thing. Nishkid64 02:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Galina Starovoitova

Ok, I'll try to take a look at it today. Dryman 18:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

RE:Communism and Nazism

One interesting point I found there is that Soviet occupiers in East Europe were actually worse than Nazi occupiers. - Indeed, the Baltic States suffered considerably more from Communist repressions than under Nazi rule (Estonia/Latvia lost about 1/4 of population during the WW2 - mostly due to Communism). Hence the alleged pro-Nazi tendencies (?!) there. The number of victims of Communism of course exceeds that of Nazism [3], since Nazism was obvious evil and was quickly defeated, but commies managed to hold power for 70 yrs. Constanz - Talk 08:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Suvorov on Berlin wall

Hi, I added Suvorov's citation on the wall & communism [4] here. If you happen to take interest in it, you might improve the translation. The original text is here [5].Constanz - Talk 11:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:83.236.12.38

I think it was a good faith effort, but I reverted the user's massive changes. I'm leaving a note on his/her talk page about their edit. Nishkid64 20:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Question

I'm hoping that with your experitise in membrane proteins you might be able to help me with this one. My lab is working with a peripheral protein that we believe binds to the external side of the cell membrane by adhesion to mannan, and in order to investigate the possibility I would like to enzymatically digest the extracellular mannan from immobilized cells, but I can't seem to find an enzyme that preferentially digests mannan in literature or the Sigma catalogue. Would you happen to know anything offhand that I might be able to use? Many thanks in advance. – ClockworkSoul 17:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

C2 domain

Hello! A bot caught your creation of C2 domain as a possible copyvio from here. Usually, we delete them under a general speedy criteria (G12), but in this case it is not entirely clear. In the terms of use the site claims the database is public for any purpose. Can you confirm this is right, and information copied from such database is not copyvio? You can either reply at my talk page or at Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations, as I will leave the entry listed there until this is confirmed. Thanks in advance. -- ReyBrujo 04:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Glad to hear it was a false positive. As User:Wherebot is likely to catch new additions if they are copied, could you please add a note in their talk pages either pointing to the WikiProject discussion, or to the C2 domain precedent? It will make things easier for us to remove them from the copyvio list as soon as they appear. Thanks again! -- ReyBrujo 05:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Allow me

I, abakharev, award this "Exceptional newcomer" butterfly, in recognition of your excellent contributions to the articles on modern Russian history. We need more of them. Alex Bakharev 12:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: C2 domain, Pfam/Interpro summaries, and copyright

Sorry for the long response time (I was on wikibreak).

As Wikipedia is under the GFDL, and not the GPL, I am not sure if we can use their summaries. What do you think of the matter?

-- Where 00:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Novartis/GNF has contacted us to talk about collaboration and importing data. This could fit well with your use of Pfam. The talk page is here. Thanks. TimVickers 19:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

You're right. If they gave permission, then it is fine. I was under the impression from the letter posted on the talk page that they only gave permission provided derivative works were distributed under the GPL though? I'm not sure. If you think you have permission, I will add the links to Wherebot's ignore list. -- Where 15:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Putin-chan's poem

Sorry about the usage of "Putin-chan," as it is a joke between me and a friend--kind of a slip of the mind. I am not really sure if a satirical poem on Putin is appropriate. I would have to say it isn't that absurd when it comes to how Putin is perceived in Russian media, but I don't believe it is acceptable for the article. My suggestion is to remove it, and ask in the talk page what other people's thoughts are. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 03:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits

Your edits in Active Measures and disinformation are of polar quality. While the fist one is based on solid sources, the edits of the second one are your quite dubious interpretations and shaky sources. While you have some points there, I will come to it later. Meanwhile you please find sources for your two changes in disinformation in the intro and about propaganda. Why would you want to compare it with "propaganda" anyway? `'mikka 02:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

See disinformation talk page. I used another Encyclopedia as source. It has been compared already with "propaganda" prior to my edit.Biophys

Re: Vandalism

I define spam as deliberately saturating Wikipedia entries with links from a particular source(s). You are clearly guilty of this. On the one hand, one may do this to a moderate degree if the intent is to provide sources for an article, but when it amounts to essentially "selling" a writer, a website, a book, etc., then it's spam. A good number of the books you listed in the Terrorism "Further Reading" section are irrelevant to the topic. Robert Spencer writes about terrorism, but that issue is not specific to all of his books. You simply decided to list a bibliography of books which share your view on the causes of terrorism, whether or not those books even relate to the issue. In the Emerson article, you shamelessly plugged in a FrontPageMag link. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum to propagate your views.

Also, don't "warn" me. You're not an administrator. Don't pretend to be some concerned neutral arbitrator. You are not.--Kitrus 08:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!

– ClockworkSoul 18:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Adding to Category:Integral membrane proteins

When you add article to this category make sure this category isn't a subcategory of another category the article belongs to - for an example some of the articles are already in the category Category:Proteins, so when you add the same article to Category:Integral membrane proteins, which is subcategory of Category:Proteins down the category tree, things get a little redundant. What you need to do is to remove the parent category. -- Boris 05:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! I will do it. Biophys 06:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: La Russophob

An editor has nominated the article La Russophob for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Russophob. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article La Russophob during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 13:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Hello! I'd just like to emphasize that you can add to the article during the deletion debate, especially if you think you can add independant sourcing. Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 17:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

MscL

Hello,

I saw your MscL article and i would like to ask you, please, write something about MscS too, and TREK, TRAAK etc! Please, please, please!!!

Shchekochikhin

As you seem interested in his biography, could you please take a look at Three Whales Corruption Scandal and edit it if necessary? I feel unable to deal with lengthy articles now. Colchicum 18:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

O'K, I will take a look. But you know this subject much better than me. Biophys

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Vlad fedorov

I have filed a request concerning Vlad Fedorov's conduct. You could take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Vlad fedorov. Colchicum 14:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I will wait a little and see what happens before making a comment.Ultramarine 17:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Hodja Nasreddin)

Hello, Hodja Nasreddin. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hodja Nasreddin, where you may want to participate. -- Vlad fedorov 19:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to notify you that my request for comment on your stalking and harrassing behaviour was signed by Ellol.Vlad fedorov 22:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I could not help but notice

that your Vladimir Putin =====> "national phallus" addition to the phallus article has been removed. This is the second time the same posting has been removed, both times by the same editor, User:Alex Bakharev. Carptrash 02:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Mediation Comment

Comments have been made on the mediation page between you and Vlad fedorov at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-10 Boris Stomakhin. Diez2 16:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

What was that all about?!

Seems like you are the creator of 'Category:Victims of Russian political repressions'.Ok,I have only one question.What were you looking at?Check that category.Firstly,the demise of Dudayev can not be considered a 'political repression' because he wasn't a dissident,he was a warlord and a self-proclaimed President.Oh,and he was blown up during a war(xasualties always happen during wars).You can also find Litvinenko,Yushenkov,Yandarbiyev (note:the Kremlin's involvment in their deaths has not been proven).I'm surprised I didn't see Politkovskaya in that category.Until the Kremlin's involvment gets proven they canot be considered "victims of Russian political repressions".Dimts 20:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:CIV

Please be cool and civil when the editorial conflict gets hot. Calling your opponents names never helped to anyone. This was over the top. Happy editing Alex Bakharev 05:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

First, how can you call this "personal attack" if I did not name any specific "person" in my message? Second, I think that wikistalking case is obvious and proven, as follows from these comments: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Vlad_fedorov#New_episodes_of_wikistalking_by_Vlad Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Vlad_fedorov#Statement_of_the_dispute. This is not the case of good faith editing when negotiations can help. This can only go to mediation and arbitration. Biophys 15:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Vlad

I did some looking around, and you have good points. The person who is locking the Russian pages is definitely working for the Russian government, as well as people like Vlad also editing, so I would suggest bringing this up with someone really high up, i.e. the most powerful person/mod on wiki. I'll do anything I can to bring this up, however, since I'm sort of new at this, there isn't much I can do. CPTGbr 03:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

As well, this guy seems to be locking all the Russian-related pages: User:Alex_Bakharev. Corruption anyone? CPTGbr 03:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)