User talk:The Banner: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:The Banner/Archives/2023/August. (BOT) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::I do not use the Android mobile app, though. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 17:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
::::I do not use the Android mobile app, though. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 17:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
:It appears to have been resolved now. [[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]] ([[User talk:Panamitsu|talk]]) 21:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
:It appears to have been resolved now. [[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]] ([[User talk:Panamitsu|talk]]) 21:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
== [[Battle of Britain]] - "bypass redirects" == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
Could you explain your reasoning for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Britain&diff=1172266851&oldid=1172258301 this reversion] at [[Battle of Britain]]? My edit follows the advice at [[MOS:NOPIPE]] and [[WP:NOPIPE]], for example, "avoid making links longer than necessary", "it is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects", "do not use a piped link where it is possible to use a redirected term that fits well within the scope of the text", etc. |
|||
Best wishes, [[User:Jean-de-Nivelle|Jean-de-Nivelle]] ([[User talk:Jean-de-Nivelle|talk]]) 09:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
PS Also [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bar_Association_%28Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine%29&diff=1172267428&oldid=1171993594 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Body_Parts_%28Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine%29&diff=1172267375&oldid=1172011047 here], and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zapp_(album)&diff=prev&oldid=1172267075 here]. [[User:Jean-de-Nivelle|Jean-de-Nivelle]] ([[User talk:Jean-de-Nivelle|talk]]) 09:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:27, 26 August 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Size_of_English_Wikipedia_broken_down_freaking.png/500px-Size_of_English_Wikipedia_broken_down_freaking.png)
![]() | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e4/Interior_view_of_Stockholm_Public_Library.jpg/238px-Interior_view_of_Stockholm_Public_Library.jpg)
Part 1: Old archives, organised per year.
Part 2: Current archives, organised per month
Archive 2011, Archive 2012, Archive 2013, Archive 2014, Archive 2015, Archive 2016, Archive 2017, Archive 2018, Archive 2019, Archive 2020, Archive 2021 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Need help with vandalism
I'm not sure where I am supposed to report this so I thought I'd try here. The article 0 has a strange problem which you can only see on the android mobile app. You can not see it on the web, and it is not in the source. Above the lede, it says "I like when my coom spreads into my daddys face", and has been like that for atleast an entire day. Panamitsu (talk) 12:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think the answer is both yes and no. No, I do not use the mobile version so I can not reproduce or solve the vandalism reported. But the answer is also yes, as I gave a shout for help at a trusted admin here. Hopefully he or one of his friends can help. Thanks for reporting it to me. The Banner talk 13:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Cullen328, you're on Android, right? I can't see anything on my iPhone. Banner, this is likely some fuckery in a template, and it may have been taken care of already, but like you I don't see anything either. Drmies (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, Drmies, I usually edit on an Android phone using desktop. I switched to mobile and do not see the vandalism. Since the article was last edited four days ago, that supports the theory that it was template vandalism, since reverted. Are you still seeing the problem, Panamitsu? Cullen328 (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I do not use the Android mobile app, though. Cullen328 (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, Drmies, I usually edit on an Android phone using desktop. I switched to mobile and do not see the vandalism. Since the article was last edited four days ago, that supports the theory that it was template vandalism, since reverted. Are you still seeing the problem, Panamitsu? Cullen328 (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Cullen328, you're on Android, right? I can't see anything on my iPhone. Banner, this is likely some fuckery in a template, and it may have been taken care of already, but like you I don't see anything either. Drmies (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It appears to have been resolved now. Panamitsu (talk) 21:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Battle of Britain - "bypass redirects"
Hi,
Could you explain your reasoning for this reversion at Battle of Britain? My edit follows the advice at MOS:NOPIPE and WP:NOPIPE, for example, "avoid making links longer than necessary", "it is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects", "do not use a piped link where it is possible to use a redirected term that fits well within the scope of the text", etc.
Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
PS Also here, here, and here. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)