Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Shakespearean characters/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AZPR (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:


Haha, which I happen to be. I guess we'll decide on it as more reviewers come. [[User:Wrad|Wrad]] 12:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Haha, which I happen to be. I guess we'll decide on it as more reviewers come. [[User:Wrad|Wrad]] 12:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

*Please see [[User:AndyZ/peerreviewer|automated]] peer review suggestions [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/May 2007#List of Shakespearean characters|here]]. Thanks, [[User:AZPR|APR]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:AndyZ|t]]</sub> 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:09, 8 May 2007

User:AndyJones has been working on this list since he created it on 2 November 2005. He is near to completion with only two plays left to cover. This is such a well researched and well structured and useful article that I feel it should be nominated for Featured List when finished. Advise on how the List could be improved or made more accessible for readers would be helpful.

I am wondering if the list should be in a form of a table.

Name of character / Play / Gender / Comment

Perhaps with colour coding for each play - or perhaps group of plays - The Comedies, The Problem Plays, The Histories, etc.


SilkTork 00:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may be wrong, but isn't color coding discouraged in Wikipedia? A table might be nice though. Wrad 14:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colour coding appears on Featured Lists, such as List of elements by name and Timeline of Apple Macintosh models. However, I can understand that some people may have difficulty following a colour code if the article depended on it and they were colour blind. SilkTork 09:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, which I happen to be. I guess we'll decide on it as more reviewers come. Wrad 12:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]