User talk:84.87.138.105: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:25, 8 August 2007

This IP address resolved to ip54578a69.direct-adsl.nl as of 1 June 2007, 15:03 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to Bonnie Wright will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John Reaves (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Blowland

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Onorem Dil 09:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Murlock. Thank you. please dont restore user pages of sockpuppets its considered disruptive Gnan garra 07:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly won't vandalise again. I am sorry for my actions from the past, and won't do those things again. 84.87.138.105 08:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fun

lOOK HERE:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

84.87.138.105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me; I was trying to prevent a great user-page (H.0's-userpage, from being deleted). Have you any idea, how much good things this editor has done? How much work there has been done at such a wonderful user-page? And just in a few seconds, you delete everything on which he has worked for hours. Just in a few seconds, much of his articles, are being deleted, without his knowledge, and without him in the position to do anything about it. Have you got any idea just how frustrating that is?" 84.87.138.105 10:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Clearly, you are an abusive sockpuppet. — Yamla 13:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Consider this:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

84.87.138.105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I'm just a user who thinks that this man has done to much good contributions to be just blocked as a sockpuppet. Ask around about him and his articles. And check Kermanshahi; he's just a sockpuppeteer with a lot of connections to sockpuppets, and I think you should block him aswell, when you think about blocking me, or H.O. Consider it, okay? 84.87.138.105 15:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sure, you're just restoring his userpage. And keeping up his conversations. And editing the same pages he does. And you just happened to pop up the same time he's blocked. Nothing at all suspicious about that. – Luna Santin (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is a confirmed sock puppet of Mrlob, as established by CheckUser.
No checkuser request page has been specified for this account,
or it doesn't exist; you may wish to try here.

Account information: contribs — page moves — all logs — block log — sock master userpage.

"And I don't denie that at all! But since my unblockement on July the 26th, after a month of blocking my IP-adress, I was, again, able to edit. I was unblocked! Can you even possible imagine just how happy I was! This time, I will finally start doing nothing but good things, whenever I am online and editing. Yes, I had quite a lot socks, but now, that part of the whole thing is history. I will never, ever have socks again, I've sworn that day, and I'll never missuse any account again. I'm sorry for all the worries I've caused Chrislk02, User:Kermanshahi, and many others. I still am very fond on the many good things, and usefull edits my socks did. I often still look on the Dorus Rijkers-article, ior my very first one, on the honourable Chief Lone Horn.I hope you can all forgive me, and accept my humble apologies. I now just want to start all over again. Fresh, and renewded. I hope, thats enough of an explanation for my behavior for the last couple a months."

"By 84.87.138.105 08:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

It would be nice to have a check user identify all these socks, so we can roll them back immediately per WP:SOCK and WP:BAN. Stop wasting everyone's time with sock puppetry and hoax articles. --Merbabu 13:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I shall. But you must have noticed, I actually have quite a lot non/hoax articles around here, created with several socks. Besides the many bad ones, of course...

A good starting point is to list all the sock accounts you have used or created. From there apologies to the editors who showed good faith in you only to be let done by yet another sock. From there we can talk about what further actions/conditions are needed to be in place and from when restoring editing privileges could be considered. At the moment there isnt any offer for unblocking its only a thought on what could take place, any decision would need to support within the wider community Gnan garra 14:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can make that list, but I think you've allready got it. All the known "sockpuppets of Mrlob", are mine, since Mrlob was my first account on the English wikipedia, besides my IP-adress; the one on which I am currently editing. Note that I was also active on the Dutch, French, Frisian and Simple English wikipedia's. On all those, I have only one account, and no vandalism has been done there, at all. Except for the Dutch wikipedia, on which mine and also Kermanshahi's accounts have been banned indefinetely. There is a link on Kermanshahi's user-page, to a Dutch account called "Kermansjahi", with a "j". My own accounts there are called Sirlob, BozeJoop (Angry Jope), and OLOL. You might contact some Dutch admins on the Dutch wikipedia; most of them speak excellent English. You know all my accounts on this wikipedia; you might check out the accounts there, if you'd really like to solve this matter. At first, I tried to cover up Kermanshahi, but I now realised that is nonsense; he is more involved with sockpuppetry and vandalism then you might know. Truth is, I and Kermanshahi know each othert in real; we are students, and both live in the Netherlands. That might explain my edits on wikipedia; they are mostly to Dutch and Frisian related articles; (I'm partly Dutch, partly Frisian). Kermanshahi, on the other hand, is originally an Iranian. He has done some good things on wikipedia, and made 2900 edits, as he claims. But my Hagawaga-Oegawaga account also made 2000+ edits on here, and created three B-class articles, of which one, Dorus Rijkers, became a DYK-article. From on this IP-adress, I tried to unblock that account, on which I have much good edits. Because H.O was my fresh start, after a lot of socks. And when he was blocked, due the effords of User:Roland'91 and User:Blowland (another man I know in real), I was very angry, and tried to unblock myself. I failed, and my talk-page got blocked, and later deleted, which I still greatly feel angry about. My user-page, on which I did much effords to make it that nice, was deleted, and couldn't restore it, sadly (it was very nice, that page, and Phaedriel even gave me a star for it). Well, than there was the Murlock account, which told things on me which had me and both the vandals blocked; he was also someone I know. Many of his edits were made from this IP-adress, and I did them, because again, I had a fight with him in real life, and I knew his password, on which I took disadvantage (how mean of me to do so). But when you would take a closer look at a check-user and its results on him, you'll see that the accusations he mentioned on mem, were done from a different IP-adress, on which I never edited, as far as I know. On the same adress, the account was created. So, accept from Blowland, Roland'91 and Murlock, all the accounts known as socks of Mrlob, are indeed socks of Mrlob. As you now know, the whole story is more complex than you might have known. Kermanshahi, well, he just tried to save his own ass, but he also is a sockpuppeteer, probabaly. I don't know which accounts are his, but on the Dutch wiki, his account has allready been blocked indefenitely. Again, I think you might find it usefull to ask around on the Dutch wikipedia. The administators there also mostly have accounts on this wikipedia; you can contact them there if you'd like. I can't ask them myself, because this IP-adress has been blocked there, and so are all my accounts and Kermanshahi\Kermansjahi's overthere. Consider take a look at Kermanshahi's user-page, and click the link to dutch wiki; you'll then see he's blocked there for sockpupettery; (or "Sokpopperij", in Dutch!). Is that enough explanation for know? I hope this is usefull to you, for now. 84.87.138.105 16:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:14, 8 August 2007 edit Gnangarra (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 28,294 edits →‎Consider this:: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:25, 8 August 2007 edit undo 84.87.138.105 (talk) About my socks Next edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	A good starting point is to list all the sock accounts you have used or created. From there apologies to the editors who showed good faith in you only to be let done by yet another sock. From there we can talk about what further actions/conditions are needed to be in place and from when restoring editing privileges could be considered. At the moment there isnt any offer for unblocking its only a thought on what could take place, any decision would need to support within the wider community [[User:Gnangarra\|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra\|garra]] 14:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)		A good starting point is to list all the sock accounts you have used or created. From there apologies to the editors who showed good faith in you only to be let done by yet another sock. From there we can talk about what further actions/conditions are needed to be in place and from when restoring editing privileges could be considered. At the moment there isnt any offer for unblocking its only a thought on what could take place, any decision would need to support within the wider community [[User:Gnangarra\|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra\|garra]] 14:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

			:Well, I can make that list, but I think you've allready got it. All the known "sockpuppets of Mrlob", are mine, since Mrlob was my first account on the English wikipedia, besides my IP-adress; the one on which I am currently editing. Note that I was also active on the Dutch, French, Frisian and Simple English wikipedia's. On all those, I have only one account, and no vandalism has been done there, at all. Except for the Dutch wikipedia, on which mine and also [[User:Kermanshahi\|Kermanshahi]]'s accounts have been banned indefinetely. There is a link on Kermanshahi's user-page, to a Dutch account called "''Kermansjahi''", with a "''j''". My own accounts there are called '''Sirlob''', '''BozeJoop''' (Angry Jope), and '''OLOL'''. You might contact some Dutch admins on the Dutch wikipedia; most of them speak excellent English. You know all my accounts on this wikipedia; you might check out the accounts there, if you'd really like to solve this matter. At first, I tried to cover up Kermanshahi, but I now realised that is nonsense; he is more involved with sockpuppetry and vandalism then you might know. Truth is, I and Kermanshahi know each othert in real; we are students, and both live in the Netherlands. That might explain my edits on wikipedia; they are mostly to Dutch and Frisian related articles; (I'm partly Dutch, partly Frisian). Kermanshahi, on the other hand, is originally an Iranian. He has done some good things on wikipedia, and made 2900 edits, as he claims. But my Hagawaga-Oegawaga account also made 2000+ edits on here, and created three B-class articles, of which one, [[Dorus Rijkers]], became a DYK-article. From on this IP-adress, I tried to unblock that account, on which I have much good edits. Because H.O was my fresh start, after a lot of socks. And when he was blocked, due the effords of [[User:Roland'91]] and [[User:Blowland]] (another man I know in real), I was very angry, and tried to unblock myself. I failed, and my talk-page got blocked, and later deleted, which I still greatly feel angry about. My user-page, on which I did much effords to make it that nice, was deleted, and couldn't restore it, sadly (it was very nice, that page, and [[User:Phaedriel\|Phaedriel]] even gave me a star for it). Well, than there was the Murlock account, which told things on me which had me and both the vandals blocked; he was also someone I know. Many of his edits were made from this IP-adress, and I did them, because again, I had a fight with him in real life, and I knew his password, on which I took disadvantage (how mean of me to do so). But when you would take a closer look at a check-user and its results on him, you'll see that the accusations he mentioned on mem, were done from a different IP-adress, on which I never edited, as far as I know. On the same adress, the account was created. So, accept from Blowland, Roland'91 and Murlock, all the accounts known as socks of Mrlob, are indeed socks of Mrlob. As you now know, the whole story is more complex than you might have known. Kermanshahi, well, he just tried to save his own ass, but he also is a sockpuppeteer, probabaly. I don't know which accounts are his, but on the Dutch wiki, his account has allready been blocked indefenitely. Again, I think you might find it usefull to ask around on the Dutch wikipedia. The administators there also mostly have accounts on this wikipedia; you can contact them there if you'd like. I can't ask them myself, because this IP-adress has been blocked there, and so are all my accounts and Kermanshahi\Kermansjahi's overthere. Consider take a look at Kermanshahi's user-page, and click the link to dutch wiki; you'll then see he's blocked there for sockpupettery; (or "''Sokpopperij''", in Dutch!). Is that enough explanation for know? I hope this is usefull to you, for now. [[User:84.87.138.105\|84.87.138.105]] 16:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)