Jump to content

User talk:AA: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Re:Fatimah
Panoptical (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:


Sorry for being so slow on the Fatimah article, life comes at you fast sometimes. I'll go over and take a look at it right now iA. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] 14:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for being so slow on the Fatimah article, life comes at you fast sometimes. I'll go over and take a look at it right now iA. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] 14:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

== Re: ==

AA, we can't put all the conflicts behind if you insist on distorting the truth on how Fatima died. I'll try to contact other editors and write another version, and maybe then we could reach a consensus and show both points of view. <small>[[User:Klaksonn|<sup>Klak</sup><sub>Sonn</sub>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Klaksonn|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:18, 9 August 2007

Welcome to AA's Talk Page

User talk:AA/Archive Barnstar

Gone to review

I have put myself for an editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Aditya Kabir. Check. Aditya Kabir 05:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Muslim reports

I think most of them actually aren't notable, barring the odd exception. a lot of these "Hadith of..." articles have been nominated for deletion before, which have been usually unsuccessful as far as i remember. it may be worth nominating the most trivial reports at least, just to see how the community feels about it. not only do most of them fail notability guidelines, it appears to be a clear violation of WP:NOT. ITAQALLAH 01:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'll start with some "easy" ones and see how it goes. → AA (talk)08:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
also, about the improvements you are making to Fatimah, i have a few good sources on the subject, so i'll be happy to help out where i can. ITAQALLAH 01:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to Bangladesh portal. I have tried to address the concerns in earlier peer review and checked the portal against Featured portal criteria. Based on this I think it is proper time to push for Featured Portal status for Bangladesh Portal, which will be an important milestone for WikiProject Bangladesh. But to achieve this I need help from you. Please participate in the on-going discussion on the talk page and give me your valuable inputs.-Arman Aziz 03:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 05:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

AA, you might be interested to see this and this. Thank you for revisiting this issue. Itaqallah and ALM have indicated some interest in this as well.Proabivouac 11:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointers. I totally agree with your sentiments on the AfD page. → AA (talk)11:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Usamah

Hello, I reverted that addition because it had no references, no edit summury, and it is a controversial topic where vandalism is not obvious. I told the user who added that to look for sources. Finally, the user had been added the exact same thing in many pages. Note that I did not warn her for vandalism, but for adding unsourced claims in controversial topics. I hope you understand, Brusegadi 22:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. → AA (talk)22:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fatimah

Sorry for being so slow on the Fatimah article, life comes at you fast sometimes. I'll go over and take a look at it right now iA. MezzoMezzo 14:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

AA, we can't put all the conflicts behind if you insist on distorting the truth on how Fatima died. I'll try to contact other editors and write another version, and maybe then we could reach a consensus and show both points of view. KlakSonnTalk 15:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]