Super Tuesday, 2008: Difference between revisions
major expansion: increased number of states to twenty, removed incorrect states, added text, links, citations |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Super Duper Tuesday.png|thumb|320px|Currently 21 states are scheduled to hold caucuses or primary elections on Super Duper Tuesday. <font color=" |
[[Image:Super Duper Tuesday.png|thumb|320px|Currently 21 states are scheduled to hold caucuses or primary elections on Super Duper Tuesday. <font color="Blue">'''Blue'''</font> denotes Democrat-only caucuses (2), and <font color="Purple">'''Purple'''</font> represents states holding elections for both parties (18).]] |
||
'''Super Duper Tuesday''' (also variously called '''Giga Tuesday''' and '''Tsunami Tuesday''') is the |
'''Super Duper Tuesday''' (also variously called '''Giga Tuesday''' and '''Tsunami Tuesday''') is the date in February on which the largest number of multi-state [[U.S. presidential primary|primary elections]] are scheduled to be held during the [[U.S. presidential election]] cycle.<ref name="SJFPPbbc"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
| last = Greene |
| last = Greene |
||
| first = Richard Allen |
| first = Richard Allen |
||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
| date = 2007-05-30 |
| date = 2007-05-30 |
||
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6501241.stm |
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6501241.stm |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }}</ref> The name Super Duper Tuesday is a reference to [[Super Tuesday]], which until the 2008 election cycle was the date |
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
||
</ref> The name Super Duper Tuesday is a reference to [[Super Tuesday]], which until the 2008 election cycle was the date with the largest number of primary elections.<ref name="ICABOAcnn"> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
| last = Schneider |
| last = Schneider |
||
| first = Bill |
| first = Bill |
||
| authorlink = Bill Schneider (journalist) |
| authorlink = Bill Schneider (journalist) |
||
| title = It could all be over after 'Super Duper Tuesday' |
| title = It could all be over after 'Super Duper Tuesday' |
||
⚫ | |||
| publisher = [[CNN]] |
| publisher = [[CNN]] |
||
| date = 2007-02-07 |
| date = 2007-02-07 |
||
| url = http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/05/schneider.superduper.tuesday/index.html |
| url = http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/05/schneider.superduper.tuesday/index.html |
||
⚫ | |||
</ref> The immediate predecessor of Super Duper Tuesday was the 2004 election cycle's [[Mini-Tuesday]], so named because seven states held their elections on this date. For 2008, [[5 February]] is the date for Super Duper Tuesday. |
|||
[[As of September 2007]], there are 20 states scheduled to hold caucus or primary elections for one or both parties.<ref> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
| url = http://archive.stateline.org/flash-data/Primary/2008_presidential_primaries.pdf |
|||
| title = Presidential primary and caucus dates |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| format = [[Portable Document Format|PDF]] |
|||
| work = Stateline.org |
|||
| publisher = [[Pew Research Center]] |
|||
| pages = 1 }} |
|||
</ref> The large number of states holding early elections could compress the nomination campaign season down to just a few weeks long.<ref name="ICABOAcnn" /> As a comparison, in the 2000 election cycle, by early February only about 2% of [[United States presidential nominating convention|nominating convention]] [[delegate]]s had been selected. However 2008 will see over over 40% of the delegates chosen by early February.<ref name="MSSSPIRbg"> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = Mooney |
|||
| first = Brian C. |
|||
⚫ | |||
| title = Michigan set to send slate of primaries into revision |
|||
| newspaper = [[The Boston Globe]] |
|||
| url = http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/08/21/michigan_set_to_send_slate_of_primaries_into_revision/ |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-08-31 }} |
|||
</ref> In an attempt to keep states from moving their primary or caucus elections even earlier, the [[Democratic National Committee]] and [[Republican National Committee]] have established penalties for states holding elections earlier than [[5 February]] [[2008]].<ref name="MSSSPIRbg" /> |
|||
== History == |
== History == |
||
As of February 2007, eight states were scheduled to hold primary or [[caucus]] elections on |
As of February 2007, eight states were scheduled to hold primary or [[caucus]] elections on Super Tuesday, [[5 February]] [[2008]]: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, New Mexico [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]], North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia [[Republican Party (United States)|Republicans]].<ref name="ICABOAcnn"/><ref name="CPMCSDTcnn"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
| coauthors = Robert Yoon, Bill Schneider |
| coauthors = Robert Yoon, Bill Schneider |
||
| title = California primary move creates Super-duper Tuesday |
| title = California primary move creates Super-duper Tuesday |
||
Line 27: | Line 52: | ||
| date = 2007-03-15 |
| date = 2007-03-15 |
||
| url = http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/15/california.primary/index.html |
| url = http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/15/california.primary/index.html |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
|||
</ref> However to increase their importance in the candidate selection process, several states have shifted up their contests, a move described by some critics as being "pure self-interest."<ref name="SJFPPbbc" /> The following states have changed their elections to February 5, a date eventually re-christened Super Duper Tuesday: Alaska,<ref name="GAJFFLFnyt"> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = Kapochunas |
| last = Kapochunas |
||
| first = Rachel |
| first = Rachel |
||
| publication-date = 2007-05-30 |
|||
| title = Georgia, Alaska Join Feb. 5 Front-Loading Frenzy |
| title = Georgia, Alaska Join Feb. 5 Front-Loading Frenzy |
||
| work = [[Congressional Quarterly]] |
| work = [[Congressional Quarterly]] |
||
| |
| newspaper = [[The New York Times]] |
||
⚫ | |||
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2007/05/30/cq_2810.html |
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2007/05/30/cq_2810.html |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
||
</ref> Arizona, <ref name="EPBASWads"> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| publication-date = 2007-08-23 |
|||
| title = Earlier primary boosts Arizona in several ways |
|||
| newspaper = [[Arizona Daily Star]] |
|||
| publication-place = [[Tucson, Arizona]] |
|||
| url = http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/border/197680.php |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-08-31 }} |
|||
</ref> California, <ref name="CPMCSDTcnn" /> Colorado, <ref name="EPBASWads" /> Connecticut, <ref> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| publication-date = 2007-08-18 |
|||
| title = Our view: Candidates deserve our attention now |
|||
| newspaper = [[Norwich Bulletin]] |
|||
| publication-place = [[Norwich, Connecticut]] |
|||
| url = http://www.norwichbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070818/OPINION01/708180324 |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-08-31 }} |
|||
</ref> Georgia, <ref name="GAJFFLFnyt" /> Idaho Democrats,<ref> |
|||
{{cite press release |
|||
| title = Democrats re-elect chairman Stallings, change caucus date |
| title = Democrats re-elect chairman Stallings, change caucus date |
||
| publisher = [[Idaho Democratic Party]] |
| publisher = [[Idaho Democratic Party]] |
||
Line 41: | Line 86: | ||
| url = http://www.idaho-democrats.org/ht/display/ReleaseDetails/i/1011889 |
| url = http://www.idaho-democrats.org/ht/display/ReleaseDetails/i/1011889 |
||
| accessdate = 2007-08-06 |
| accessdate = 2007-08-06 |
||
| quote = the state central committee selected Feb. 5, 2008, as the party’s new presidential caucus date }}</ref> Illinois,<ref>{{Citation |
| quote = the state central committee selected Feb. 5, 2008, as the party’s new presidential caucus date }} |
||
</ref> Illinois, <ref> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = Rick |
| last = Rick |
||
| first = Pearson |
| first = Pearson |
||
| publication-date = 2007-06-21 |
|||
| title = Illinois joins crush on Super Duper Tuesday |
| title = Illinois joins crush on Super Duper Tuesday |
||
| newspaper = [[Chicago Tribune]] |
| newspaper = [[Chicago Tribune]] |
||
⚫ | |||
| url = http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-primary21jun21,1,2652555.story?ctrack=1&cset=true |
| url = http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-primary21jun21,1,2652555.story?ctrack=1&cset=true |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-21 }} |
| accessdate = 2007-06-21 }} |
||
</ref> Minnesota,<ref> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = von Sternberg |
| last = von Sternberg |
||
| first = Bob |
| first = Bob |
||
| publication-date = 2007-07-11 |
|||
| title = GOP moves its caucuses to Super Tuesday 2008 to gain national clout |
| title = GOP moves its caucuses to Super Tuesday 2008 to gain national clout |
||
| newspaper = [[Star Tribune]] |
| newspaper = [[Star Tribune]] |
||
| publication-place = [[Minneapolis, Minnesota]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
| url = http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1296474.html |
| url = http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1296474.html |
||
| accessdate = 2007-08-06 }}</ref> New Jersey,<ref>{{ |
| accessdate = 2007-08-06 }} |
||
</ref> New Jersey,<ref> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = Smothers |
| last = Smothers |
||
| first = Ronald |
| first = Ronald |
||
| publication-date = 2007-02-27 |
|||
| title = New Jersey Moves to Join Early Presidential Primaries |
| title = New Jersey Moves to Join Early Presidential Primaries |
||
| |
| newspaper = [[The New York Times]] |
||
⚫ | |||
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/27/nyregion/27primary.html?ex=1181016000&en=e49b961a88c31b57&ei=5070 |
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/27/nyregion/27primary.html?ex=1181016000&en=e49b961a88c31b57&ei=5070 |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }}</ref> New York <ref>{{cite web |
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
||
</ref> New York, <ref> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
| title = New York legislature votes to move up primary |
| title = New York legislature votes to move up primary |
||
| work = Political Ticker |
| work = Political Ticker |
||
Line 69: | Line 123: | ||
| url = http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/03/new-york-legislature-votes-to-move-up.html |
| url = http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/03/new-york-legislature-votes-to-move-up.html |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
||
</ref> and Tennessee <ref> |
|||
{{Citation |
|||
| last = Dries |
|||
| first = Bill |
|||
| publication-date = 2007-08-17 |
|||
| title = Repubs and Dems Fix On Feb. 5 as State Primary Date |
|||
| newspaper = [[The Daily News (Memphis)|The Daily News]] |
|||
| publication-place = [[Memphis, Tennessee]] |
|||
| volume = 122 |
|||
⚫ | |||
| url = http://www.memphisdailynews.com/Editorial/StoryLead.aspx?id=98540 |
|||
| accessdate = 2007-08-31 }} |
|||
</ref>. |
</ref>. |
||
Additional states with bills before their state legislatures proposing to move their election dates to Super Duper Tuesday include |
Additional states with bills before their state legislatures proposing to move their election dates to Super Duper Tuesday include Kansas,<ref name="SBSPACAbg"> |
||
{{cite web |
|||
| title = State-by-state primary and caucus schedule |
| title = State-by-state primary and caucus schedule |
||
| work = Campaign 2008 |
| work = Campaign 2008 |
||
| publisher = [[The Boston Globe]] |
| publisher = [[The Boston Globe]] |
||
| url = http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/primaries/ |
| url = http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/primaries/ |
||
| accessdate = 2007-06-03 }} |
|||
</ref> Michigan,<ref name="SBSPACAbg" /> and Oregon.<ref name="SBSPACAbg" /> |
|||
On Sunday June 3, 2007, the name [[Tsunami]] Tuesday—conveying the potential of Super Duper Tuesday to completely change the campaign—was mentioned on [[Meet the Press]] during a |
On Sunday June 3, 2007, the name [[Tsunami]] Tuesday—conveying the potential of Super Duper Tuesday to completely change the campaign—was mentioned on [[Meet the Press]] during a round-table discussion with presidential campaign strategists [[James Carville]], [[Bob Shrum]], [[Mary Matalin]], and [[Mike Murphy]]. |
||
== Support == |
== Support == |
||
{{sectionstub}} |
|||
Advocates for earlier elections point out that voters could have fewer candidates to select from with a later contest, because candidates who do not fare well in the early primaries and caucuses often drop out. Likewise, presidential campaigns spend "big bucks" on [[Campaign advertising|advertising]], hotel rooms, and [[Political campaign staff|campaign staff]], which can be an [[Windfall gain|economic boon]] to states holding earlier elections.<ref name="EPBASWads" /> |
|||
== Criticisms == |
== Criticisms == |
||
Critics of the earlier polling date claim it will compress the primary campaign cycle down to a three week national campaign where only financially well-off candidates can compete. CNN political pundit [[Bill Schneider (journalist)|Bill Schneider]] states: |
Critics of the earlier polling date claim it will compress the primary campaign cycle down to a three week national campaign where only financially well-off candidates can compete. CNN political pundit [[Bill Schneider (journalist)|Bill Schneider]] states: |
||
{{cquote|Those states may move up on the calendar because they want a cut of the action. They want less attention paid to small states like Iowa and New Hampshire and more attention paid to big, diverse states like Florida and California. To run in those big states, you need big money and national name recognition. Obscure contenders need not apply.}} |
{{cquote|Those states may move up on the calendar because they want a cut of the action. They want less attention paid to small states like Iowa and New Hampshire and more attention paid to big, diverse states like Florida and California. To run in those big states, you need big money and national name recognition. Obscure contenders need not apply.<ref name="ICABOAcnn" />}} |
||
Others indicate it will ultimately leave voters out of the process. In a [[BBC News]] interview, [[William F. Galvin]], the [[Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth]] said: |
Others indicate it will ultimately leave voters out of the process. In a [[BBC News]] interview, [[William F. Galvin]], the [[Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth]] said: |
||
{{cquote|The people who are being left out of this are the voters, especially those who aren't active in party affairs ... There won't be enough time for voters to focus on these candidates.}} |
{{cquote|The people who are being left out of this are the voters, especially those who aren't active in party affairs ... There won't be enough time for voters to focus on these candidates.<ref name="SJFPPbbc" />}} |
||
Regardless of the number of states moving their election dates earlier and earlier, New Hampshire vigorously maintains its 'first in the nation' primary status. By New Hampshire state law, the secretary of state has sole discretion to set the date of the primary. [[Bill Gardner]], the [[Secretary of State of New Hampshire]] for the past 31 years has not ruled out any dates for the primary election, and even intimates that "it could be this year [2007]."<ref name="SJFPPbbc" /> |
Regardless of the number of states moving their election dates earlier and earlier, New Hampshire vigorously maintains its 'first in the nation' primary status. By New Hampshire state law, the secretary of state has sole discretion to set the date of the primary. [[Bill Gardner]], the [[Secretary of State of New Hampshire]] for the past 31 years has not ruled out any dates for the primary election, and even intimates that "it could be this year [2007]."<ref name="SJFPPbbc" /> |
||
Line 102: | Line 171: | ||
! State !! Democratic Winner !! Republican Winner!! State !! Democratic Winner !! Republican Winner |
! State !! Democratic Winner !! Republican Winner!! State !! Democratic Winner !! Republican Winner |
||
|- |
|- |
||
![[Alabama]]!! !! !![[ |
![[Alabama]]!! !! !![[Illinois]] !! !! |
||
|- |
|- |
||
![[Alaska]] (C)!! !! !![[Minnesota]] (C) !! !! |
![[Alaska]] (C)!! !! !![[Minnesota]] (C) !! !! |
||
Line 114: | Line 183: | ||
![[Colorado]] (C)!! !! !![[New York]] !! !! |
![[Colorado]] (C)!! !! !![[New York]] !! !! |
||
|- |
|- |
||
![[Connecticut]]!! !! !!|[[ |
![[Connecticut]]!! !! !!|[[North Dakota]] (C) !! !! |
||
|- |
|||
![[Delaware]]!! !! !!|[[Tennessee]] !! !! |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
![[ |
![[Delaware]]!! !! !!|[[Oklahoma]] !! !! |
||
|- |
|- |
||
![[ |
![[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]!! !! !![[Tennessee]] !! !! |
||
|- |
|- |
||
![[ |
![[Idaho]] (C) !! !!— !![[Utah]] !! !! |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 02:53, 3 September 2007
Super Duper Tuesday (also variously called Giga Tuesday and Tsunami Tuesday) is the date in February on which the largest number of multi-state primary elections are scheduled to be held during the U.S. presidential election cycle.[1] The name Super Duper Tuesday is a reference to Super Tuesday, which until the 2008 election cycle was the date with the largest number of primary elections.[2] The immediate predecessor of Super Duper Tuesday was the 2004 election cycle's Mini-Tuesday, so named because seven states held their elections on this date. For 2008, 5 February is the date for Super Duper Tuesday.
As of September 2007, there are 20 states scheduled to hold caucus or primary elections for one or both parties.[3] The large number of states holding early elections could compress the nomination campaign season down to just a few weeks long.[2] As a comparison, in the 2000 election cycle, by early February only about 2% of nominating convention delegates had been selected. However 2008 will see over over 40% of the delegates chosen by early February.[4] In an attempt to keep states from moving their primary or caucus elections even earlier, the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee have established penalties for states holding elections earlier than 5 February 2008.[4]
History
As of February 2007, eight states were scheduled to hold primary or caucus elections on Super Tuesday, 5 February 2008: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, New Mexico Democrats, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia Republicans.[2][5] However to increase their importance in the candidate selection process, several states have shifted up their contests, a move described by some critics as being "pure self-interest."[1] The following states have changed their elections to February 5, a date eventually re-christened Super Duper Tuesday: Alaska,[6] Arizona, [7] California, [5] Colorado, [7] Connecticut, [8] Georgia, [6] Idaho Democrats,[9] Illinois, [10] Minnesota,[11] New Jersey,[12] New York, [13] and Tennessee [14].
Additional states with bills before their state legislatures proposing to move their election dates to Super Duper Tuesday include Kansas,[15] Michigan,[15] and Oregon.[15]
On Sunday June 3, 2007, the name Tsunami Tuesday—conveying the potential of Super Duper Tuesday to completely change the campaign—was mentioned on Meet the Press during a round-table discussion with presidential campaign strategists James Carville, Bob Shrum, Mary Matalin, and Mike Murphy.
Support
Advocates for earlier elections point out that voters could have fewer candidates to select from with a later contest, because candidates who do not fare well in the early primaries and caucuses often drop out. Likewise, presidential campaigns spend "big bucks" on advertising, hotel rooms, and campaign staff, which can be an economic boon to states holding earlier elections.[7]
Criticisms
Critics of the earlier polling date claim it will compress the primary campaign cycle down to a three week national campaign where only financially well-off candidates can compete. CNN political pundit Bill Schneider states:
Those states may move up on the calendar because they want a cut of the action. They want less attention paid to small states like Iowa and New Hampshire and more attention paid to big, diverse states like Florida and California. To run in those big states, you need big money and national name recognition. Obscure contenders need not apply.[2]
Others indicate it will ultimately leave voters out of the process. In a BBC News interview, William F. Galvin, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth said:
The people who are being left out of this are the voters, especially those who aren't active in party affairs ... There won't be enough time for voters to focus on these candidates.[1]
Regardless of the number of states moving their election dates earlier and earlier, New Hampshire vigorously maintains its 'first in the nation' primary status. By New Hampshire state law, the secretary of state has sole discretion to set the date of the primary. Bill Gardner, the Secretary of State of New Hampshire for the past 31 years has not ruled out any dates for the primary election, and even intimates that "it could be this year [2007]."[1]
Results
State | Democratic Winner | Republican Winner | State | Democratic Winner | Republican Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | Illinois | ||||
Alaska (C) | Minnesota (C) | ||||
Arizona | Missouri | ||||
Arkansas | New Jersey | ||||
California | New Mexico (C) | — | |||
Colorado (C) | New York | ||||
Connecticut | North Dakota (C) | ||||
Delaware | Oklahoma | ||||
Georgia | Tennessee | ||||
Idaho (C) | — | Utah |
References
- ^ a b c d Greene, Richard Allen (2007-05-30). "States jostle for primary power". BBC News. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ a b c d Schneider, Bill (2007-02-07). "It could all be over after 'Super Duper Tuesday'". CNN. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ "Presidential primary and caucus dates" (PDF). Stateline.org. Pew Research Center. 2007-08-30. p. 1. Retrieved 2007-08-31.
- ^ a b Mooney, Brian C. (2007-08-21), "Michigan set to send slate of primaries into revision", The Boston Globe, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^ a b
"California primary move creates Super-duper Tuesday". CNN. 2007-03-15. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b
Kapochunas, Rachel (2007-05-30), "Georgia, Alaska Join Feb. 5 Front-Loading Frenzy", The New York Times, retrieved 2007-06-03
{{citation}}
: More than one of|work=
and|newspaper=
specified (help) - ^ a b c "Earlier primary boosts Arizona in several ways", Arizona Daily Star, Tucson, Arizona, 2007-08-23, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^ "Our view: Candidates deserve our attention now", Norwich Bulletin, Norwich, Connecticut, 2007-08-18, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^
"Democrats re-elect chairman Stallings, change caucus date" (Press release). Idaho Democratic Party. 2007-03-05. Retrieved 2007-08-06.
the state central committee selected Feb. 5, 2008, as the party's new presidential caucus date
- ^ Rick, Pearson (2007-06-21), "Illinois joins crush on Super Duper Tuesday", Chicago Tribune, retrieved 2007-06-21
- ^ von Sternberg, Bob (2007-07-11), "GOP moves its caucuses to Super Tuesday 2008 to gain national clout", Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Minnesota, retrieved 2007-08-06
- ^ Smothers, Ronald (2007-02-27), "New Jersey Moves to Join Early Presidential Primaries", The New York Times, retrieved 2007-06-03
- ^ "New York legislature votes to move up primary". Political Ticker. CNN. 2007-03-21. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ Dries, Bill (2007-08-17), "Repubs and Dems Fix On Feb. 5 as State Primary Date", The Daily News, vol. 122, no. 155, Memphis, Tennessee, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^ a b c "State-by-state primary and caucus schedule". Campaign 2008. The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
See also
External links
- State-by-state primary and caucus schedule by The Boston Globe