User:Jéské Couriano: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:42, 23 October 2007

Template for people who create custom D&D stuff!

For all those who got involved in the Mudkip Meme Dispute

-Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)}

Committed identity: 19be16c988cfd2f6b11c49c9397372f5cfef4c82daeee5e36320067ec5c52818

bef215d675a6775631c31924845d2e11d608755bb24e7bc0669d7240bfa1a038 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Edit Summary Shenanigans

If you notice me leave a somewhat sarcastic edit summary when I revert an article (with the edit summary having to do with what was reverted from or to), then this is usually because whatever was added deserved a bit of a poke.

An example from November 25, 2006 would be a summary in response to vandalism by an anon on the Pikachu article. The anon had cropped out the whole Cultural Impact section (including "Parodies") and had vandalized another section (calling him a "Piro Blender"). So, I left this edit summary for my revert:

Ling-Ling say, "Revert this interesting vandalism brend!"

In the above instance, "Brend" referred to what Pikachu was called, and the speaker was in the "parodies" section.

Also, note that when I leave an edit summary on a revert, I'll add a wikilink to the governing policy in it (WP:VAND, WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, or WP:NOR), usually on the word describing why the article was reverted by me. This is true of whether or not I leave a humorous summary (such as the one above) or something as simple as "rv - speculation".

If I leave "???" in my edit summary, that means that the addition was hard to understand or added in the wrong section. If the latter, it was also reverted due to violating NOT, VAND, NPOV, or NOR.

EXTRA, EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!

Alliances/Notes

D&D

This user participates in
WikiProject
Dungeons & Dragons.

P&N

This user converts Kiddy Stuff to work with Dungeons & Dragons.

Create

This user creates custom Dungeons & Dragons content.

#151

This user is a Pokémon Evolutionist and believes that Mew is the origin.

S

Despite the look of this user's handle, he is not of Spanish or Mexican heritage.

This user is tired of hearing about "lieking Mudkipz".^[sic]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 An example from November 25, 2006 would be a summary in response to vandalism by an anon on the [[Pikachu]] article.  The anon had cropped out the whole [[Pikachu#Cultural impact|Cultural Impact]] section (including "Parodies") and had vandalized another section (calling him a "Piro [[Blender]]").  So, I left this edit summary for my revert:
-::''[[Ling-Ling]] say, "Revert this interesting [[WP:VAND|vandarism]] brend!"''
+::''[[Ling-Ling]] say, "Revert this interesting [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] brend!"''
 In the above instance, "Brend" referred to what Pikachu was called, and [[Ling-Ling|the speaker]] was in the "parodies" section.