User talk:Vpdjuric

A tag has been placed on Exinda Networks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pmedema 17:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Tag removed by tagger by request of author in order to construct the article.--Pmedema 17:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SDP.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SDP.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

AtTask

I don't know anything about the February AfD: I was considering the article for the first time, and I just didn't feel it met WP:ORG:

"A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability."

"A primary test of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it."

JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

AtTask (Software)

Might I suggest you put the article in userspace first before posting it to the talk page. The AfD will be closed tomorrow so the eyes on it will become fewer. I will be more than happy to collaborate, comment, and such with you. spryde | talk 17:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Sounds good. I will post it here for your feedback this afternoon.Vpdjuric (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't forget sources. Template:Cite web is your friend along with {{Reflist}}. spryde | talk 19:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Yes. I am in the process of putting those up.Vpdjuric (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• My draft/proposal for the article about @task (software) is posted on my user page. I used the Vpmi article as a model when I was creating the @task article. I look forward to your feedback.Vpdjuric (talk) 01:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)